Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #301
Supply side economics was a poltical hack invention and is not based in reality
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you always MAKE SHIT UP when you dont get your way?
Yes the debt ceiling was raised. A shameful practice. I did notice the dems did not oppose.
In fact they ramped up spending to make bush look rather amateurist.
But you are only concerned on what the repubs spent all the while looking the other way while you raid SS. Its been going on since 65 so you think its ok. 65 is the same year democrats declared war on families and created the marraige penalty.
Are you new at this?
After blaming the dems for something the repukes did, the wingnut has been so pwned, he is going to blame the dems for not objecting, even though they did
And it was the repukes who controlled congress while it spent money like a drunken sailor on leave. It was the repukes who turned a budget surplus into a deficit, but you're too weak to admit it
Wingnut like you makes debating real easy. There was no budget surplus.
As of Fiscal year 1999 the national debt was at:
5,674,178,209,886.86
There was a budget surplus
Anyone can create a budget surplus, all that is required is you take expenses off the books like the government.
I cant afford your type of surplus. The debt increased with that surplus, that was before the cuts were enacted.
Explain how you can have a budget surplus when your debt keeps going up?There was a budget surplus
Do you always MAKE SHIT UP when you dont get your way?
My goodness... you're a contrary little person, aren't you. Sorry 'bout that. I hope you have a good day.
Wingnut like you makes debating real easy. There was no budget surplus.
As of Fiscal year 1999 the national debt was at:
5,674,178,209,886.86
Because bush* and the republicans are Big Spending Statists
wingnut how did Bush have anything to do with spending? in 1999? This portion of the argument is dealing with Clinton surplus myth. He did not have one.
Explain how you can have a budget surplus when your debt keeps going up?There was a budget surplus
Simple. The govt spends less in one year than it takes in.
Boy, are you dumb
After blaming the dems for something the repukes did, the wingnut has been so pwned, he is going to blame the dems for not objecting, even though they did
And it was the repukes who controlled congress while it spent money like a drunken sailor on leave. It was the repukes who turned a budget surplus into a deficit, but you're too weak to admit it
Wingnut like you makes debating real easy. There was no budget surplus.
As of Fiscal year 1999 the national debt was at:
5,674,178,209,886.86
WIngnuts don't understand the difference between "national debt" and "budget deficit"
Explain how you can have a budget surplus when your debt keeps going up?
Simple. The govt spends less in one year than it takes in.
Boy, are you dumb
Or dishonest.
They always disapear when you point out either.
Because bush* and the republicans are Big Spending Statists
wingnut how did Bush have anything to do with spending? in 1999? This portion of the argument is dealing with Clinton surplus myth. He did not have one.
No, the argument is your absurd claim that there can't be a budget surplus if there's a national debt. But I dobn't blame you for trying to change the subject
Do you always MAKE SHIT UP when you dont get your way?
My goodness... you're a contrary little person, aren't you. Sorry 'bout that. I hope you have a good day.
I require people to be honest, I dont think you can meet the standard.
Simple. The govt spends less in one year than it takes in.
Boy, are you dumb
Or dishonest.
They always disapear when you point out either.
You are the most dishonest hack here. begone troll
Simple. The govt spends less in one year than it takes in.
Boy, are you dumb
Or dishonest.
They always disapear when you point out either.
You are the most dishonest hack here. begone troll
Supply side economics was a poltical hack invention and is not based in reality
Or dishonest.
They always disapear when you point out either.
You are the most dishonest hack here. begone troll
I dont lie and if you claim I do go get one fucking example of a lie by me on this or any site.
wingnut how did Bush have anything to do with spending? in 1999? This portion of the argument is dealing with Clinton surplus myth. He did not have one.
No, the argument is your absurd claim that there can't be a budget surplus if there's a national debt. But I dobn't blame you for trying to change the subject
Can't read and remember what you wrote? You said Bush was a big spender.
No, the argument is your absurd claim that there can't be a budget surplus if there's a national debt. But I dobn't blame you for trying to change the subject
Can't read and remember what you wrote? You said Bush was a big spender.
Bush was a big spender. Under bush, the US spent more money than it had under any previous president. bush set records for govt spending
In wingnut world, republicans cut spending. In the real world, that has never happened
Can't read and remember what you wrote? You said Bush was a big spender.
Bush was a big spender. Under bush, the US spent more money than it had under any previous president. bush set records for govt spending
In wingnut world, republicans cut spending. In the real world, that has never happened
Fiscal End Claimed Public Intra-gov Total National
Year Date Surplus Debt Holdings Debt
FY1997 9/30/1997 $3.789667T $1.623478T $5.413146T
FY1998 9/30/1998 $69.2B $3.733864T $55.8B $1.792328T $168.9B $5.526193T $113B
FY1999 9/30/1999 $122.7B $3.636104T $97.8B $2.020166T $227.8B $5.656270T $130.1B
FY2000 9/29/2000 $230.0B $3.405303T $230.8B $2.268874T $248.7B $5.674178T $17.9B
FY2001 9/28/2001 $3.339310T $66.0B $2.468153T $199.3B $5.807463T $133.3B
Fiscal Year National Debt Deficit
Year Ending
FY1993 9/30/1993 $4.411488 trillion
FY1994 9/30/1994 $4.692749 trillion $281.26 billion
FY1995 9/29/1995 $4.973982 trillion $281.23 billion
FY1996 9/30/1996 $5.224810 trillion $250.83 billion
FY1997 9/30/1997 $5.413146 trillion $188.34 billion
FY1998 9/30/1998 $5.526193 trillion $113.05 billion
FY1999 9/30/1999 $5.656270 trillion $130.08 billion
FY2000 9/29/2000 $5.674178 trillion $17.91 billion
FY2001 9/28/2001 $5.807463 trillion $133.29 billion
The Myth of the Clinton Surplus