things are looking up

Discussion in 'Economy' started by Truthmatters, Oct 15, 2010.

  1. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
  2. Baruch Menachem
    Offline

    Baruch Menachem '

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,204
    Thanks Received:
    3,235
    Trophy Points:
    185
    Ratings:
    +3,305
    Clutching at straws.
     
  3. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    Americans spent more money on cars, furniture and at hardware stores to boost retail sales to a third monthly increase in September. The string of gains since July followed declines in May and June. Those had raised worries that the country could be in danger of toppling back into recession. Economists caution that while the economy is growing, the expansion is not strong enough to lower face high unemployment and offset weak income growth.

    So you dont want the economy to recover?
     
  4. Immanuel
    Offline

    Immanuel Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    16,823
    Thanks Received:
    2,210
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Ratings:
    +2,224
    I'm with Baruch... Democrats grasping at straws.

    Hell yes, I want the economy to pick up, but the Democrats talked us into this problem when they began attacking Bush. They started claiming we were in a recession before we were actually in one and they actually talked us into one. They scared the hell out of the American people and actually fear mongered us into a recession. Then they blamed it on Bush. Then in February, 2009 after Obama took office, they started telling us it was not as bad as they thought it was.

    It was easy as pie to scare us into a recession. They are finding out it is not as easy to lie their way out.

    Immie
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2010
  5. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    I'm sure the economy is looking great to the few that are making money off of stocks, gold, short sales and foreclosures. Not so good for the unemployed, those working part time, or under employed. They just watch as more join their ranks and food and energy prices rise:

    Instant view: Jobless claims, producer prices, trade | Reuters

    It is amazing how everything bad with this administration is 'unexpected':


     
  6. Immanuel
    Offline

    Immanuel Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    16,823
    Thanks Received:
    2,210
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Ratings:
    +2,224
    To Democrats like TM, none of that matters as long as Obama is President. It won't matter until two weeks after the Republicans take control, then suddenly Democrats will care about the unemployed again.

    Immie
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. SFC Ollie
    Offline

    SFC Ollie Still Marching

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Messages:
    28,742
    Thanks Received:
    4,418
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Extreme East Ohio
    Ratings:
    +4,457
    Truthmatters, you really should read your own links before you make a fool of yourself.

    "But spending remains too weak to strengthen the economy and lower unemployment. "
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. antagon
    Offline

    antagon The Man

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,572
    Thanks Received:
    285
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +286
    you are absolutely clueless if you thought the recession was spooked into place.
     
  9. loosecannon
    Offline

    loosecannon Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,888
    Thanks Received:
    263
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +264
    [/QUOTE]

    That's hilarious since BenBe is saying the fed is ready to install a new round of quantitative easing just to deliver 2% inflation. He is lying about his motives of course. And 2% inflation is far too little even if that was his goal.
     
  10. loosecannon
    Offline

    loosecannon Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,888
    Thanks Received:
    263
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +264
    Actually it may have been spooked into place. But if so it was Paulson, Bernanke and the rest of the plunge protection team that began doing what is absolutely blasphemy for a fed chair or a major econ agency chair, shrieking like scared cats in a room full of rocking chairs and demanding gazzillions of dollars by next week or the world will explode.

    Any ranking economic administrator knows that since the economy is based on confidence, and a quasi ponzi arrangement at it's core, that leadership must first and foremost instill confidence. Not cause panic, which is exactly what they did.

    To date we have no proof of any kind that disaster would have struck if bailouts did not materialize. We know some banks would have been crushed, but we have no reason to believe that the economy would have followed.

    But none of this was the dems doing. It was the Bush econ team that went code red.
     

Share This Page