They're Baaaaaa-aaaaaaaack!

"Well, ice age didn't work. Global warming didn't work. Climate change didn't work. Let's try ice age again."

Let's look at your two "scientists" who predicted this ice age.

David Dilley, CEO of Global Weather Oscillations
--- An ex-weatherman guy who runs a denier blog.

Dr. Valentina Zharkova
--- Russian "ICE AGE SOON!" person, with no experience in climate science.

That is, two deniers. So, not news. Deniers have been predicting an ice age non-stop for the past 40 years. It never arrives, and it just keeps warming strongly, but that doesn't shake denier faith at all. They just feel that ice age is going to get here soon.

In contrast, the scientists have been predicting warming over those 40 years. They were proven right. That's why the scientists have so much credibility, because they've been getting everything right for 40 years now.

If you deniers want the same credibility, you have to stop failing at every single thing. That means you need to quit it with these constant ice age predictions.
 
Two? Lol
What about NOAA scientists Robert W. Reeves, Daphne Gemmill, Robert E. Livezey, and James Laver ?
Scientists at the National Academy of Scientists warnings?
Obama's science adviser R. Holden?

To name just a few.



"Well, ice age didn't work. Global warming didn't work. Climate change didn't work. Let's try ice age again."

Let's look at your two "scientists" who predicted this ice age.

David Dilley, CEO of Global Weather Oscillations
--- An ex-weatherman guy who runs a denier blog.

Dr. Valentina Zharkova
--- Russian "ICE AGE SOON!" person, with no experience in climate science.

That is, two deniers. So, not news. Deniers have been predicting an ice age non-stop for the past 40 years. It never arrives, and it just keeps warming strongly, but that doesn't shake denier faith at all. They just feel that ice age is going to get here soon.

In contrast, the scientists have been predicting warming over those 40 years. They were proven right. That's why the scientists have so much credibility, because they've been getting everything right for 40 years now.

If you deniers want the same credibility, you have to stop failing at every single thing. That means you need to quit it with these constant ice age predictions.
 
"Well, ice age didn't work. Global warming didn't work. Climate change didn't work. Let's try ice age again."

Let's look at your two "scientists" who predicted this ice age.

David Dilley, CEO of Global Weather Oscillations
--- An ex-weatherman guy who runs a denier blog.

Dr. Valentina Zharkova
--- Russian "ICE AGE SOON!" person, with no experience in climate science.

That is, two deniers. So, not news. Deniers have been predicting an ice age non-stop for the past 40 years. It never arrives

Well, they weren't deniers. They were primary speakers at the first Earth Day in DC. Don't say no, I was there.

When that scare tactic didn't work, they went to global warming.
 
"Well, ice age didn't work. Global warming didn't work. Climate change didn't work. Let's try ice age again."

Let's look at your two "scientists" who predicted this ice age.

David Dilley, CEO of Global Weather Oscillations
--- An ex-weatherman guy who runs a denier blog.

Dr. Valentina Zharkova
--- Russian "ICE AGE SOON!" person, with no experience in climate science.

That is, two deniers. So, not news. Deniers have been predicting an ice age non-stop for the past 40 years. It never arrives, and it just keeps warming strongly, but that doesn't shake denier faith at all. They just feel that ice age is going to get here soon.

In contrast, the scientists have been predicting warming over those 40 years. They were proven right. That's why the scientists have so much credibility, because they've been getting everything right for 40 years now.

If you deniers want the same credibility, you have to stop failing at every single thing. That means you need to quit it with these constant ice age predictions.


So, if the planet is warming, how come we have what is called "Global dimming" where 20 percent less sunlight is reaching earth but yet they had to change the term from Global Warming to Climate Change because it wasn't adding up? You can't have it both ways. You can't gauge the temperature of the earth with any degree of accuracy when there has been a stratospheric aerosol injection spraying program of nano-particulates of aluminium, strontium and barium and this program has been going on in earnest for the last twenty years. Does this look normal to you??????
14183711_1586996388270941_3843585490095024854_n.jpg
 
This entire thread is retarded. Please stop for your own good.

Matthew, you are one of the biggest "retards" here or to be politically correct, you are a "knows-nothing" with a double digit IQ that if I was giving an educated guess would put your score at around 86....with a plus or minus of 10.
 
What about NOAA scientists Robert W. Reeves, Daphne Gemmill,Robert E. Livezey, and James Laver?
Scientists at the National Academy of Scientists warnings?

They didn't predict cooling. They just called to study of all kinds of climate extremes.

Obama's science adviser R. Holden?

He didn't predict cooling. In that era, he was just talking about overpopulation.

To name just a few.

And that's all you can name, as most scientists were predicting warming, even in the 1970s.

About the only scientists predicting cooling were Kukla and Matthews in 1972, and Bryson later. Kukla and Bryson remained deniers until they died. Matthews, don't know, can't find any info on him. The point is that the number of scientists switching from cooling to warming predictions is essentially zero.
 
Last edited:
Two? Lol
What about NOAA scientists Robert W. Reeves, Daphne Gemmill, Robert E. Livezey, and James Laver ?
Scientists at the National Academy of Scientists warnings?
Obama's science adviser R. Holden?

To name just a few.



"Well, ice age didn't work. Global warming didn't work. Climate change didn't work. Let's try ice age again."

Let's look at your two "scientists" who predicted this ice age.

David Dilley, CEO of Global Weather Oscillations
--- An ex-weatherman guy who runs a denier blog.

Dr. Valentina Zharkova
--- Russian "ICE AGE SOON!" person, with no experience in climate science.

That is, two deniers. So, not news. Deniers have been predicting an ice age non-stop for the past 40 years. It never arrives, and it just keeps warming strongly, but that doesn't shake denier faith at all. They just feel that ice age is going to get here soon.

In contrast, the scientists have been predicting warming over those 40 years. They were proven right. That's why the scientists have so much credibility, because they've been getting everything right for 40 years now.

If you deniers want the same credibility, you have to stop failing at every single thing. That means you need to quit it with these constant ice age predictions.

Links?
 
"Well, ice age didn't work. Global warming didn't work. Climate change didn't work. Let's try ice age again."

Let's look at your two "scientists" who predicted this ice age.

David Dilley, CEO of Global Weather Oscillations
--- An ex-weatherman guy who runs a denier blog.

Dr. Valentina Zharkova
--- Russian "ICE AGE SOON!" person, with no experience in climate science.

That is, two deniers. So, not news. Deniers have been predicting an ice age non-stop for the past 40 years. It never arrives, and it just keeps warming strongly, but that doesn't shake denier faith at all. They just feel that ice age is going to get here soon.

In contrast, the scientists have been predicting warming over those 40 years. They were proven right. That's why the scientists have so much credibility, because they've been getting everything right for 40 years now.

If you deniers want the same credibility, you have to stop failing at every single thing. That means you need to quit it with these constant ice age predictions.


So, if the planet is warming, how come we have what is called "Global dimming" where 20 percent less sunlight is reaching earth but yet they had to change the term from Global Warming to Climate Change because it wasn't adding up? You can't have it both ways. You can't gauge the temperature of the earth with any degree of accuracy when there has been a stratospheric aerosol injection spraying program of nano-particulates of aluminium, strontium and barium and this program has been going on in earnest for the last twenty years. Does this look normal to you?????? View attachment 125578
Oh, where is my little tin hat, little tin hat, little tin hat............................................
 
"Well, ice age didn't work. Global warming didn't work. Climate change didn't work. Let's try ice age again."

Let's look at your two "scientists" who predicted this ice age.

David Dilley, CEO of Global Weather Oscillations
--- An ex-weatherman guy who runs a denier blog.

Dr. Valentina Zharkova
--- Russian "ICE AGE SOON!" person, with no experience in climate science.

That is, two deniers. So, not news. Deniers have been predicting an ice age non-stop for the past 40 years. It never arrives, and it just keeps warming strongly, but that doesn't shake denier faith at all. They just feel that ice age is going to get here soon.

In contrast, the scientists have been predicting warming over those 40 years. They were proven right. That's why the scientists have so much credibility, because they've been getting everything right for 40 years now.

If you deniers want the same credibility, you have to stop failing at every single thing. That means you need to quit it with these constant ice age predictions.


So, if the planet is warming, how come we have what is called "Global dimming" where 20 percent less sunlight is reaching earth but yet they had to change the term from Global Warming to Climate Change because it wasn't adding up? You can't have it both ways. You can't gauge the temperature of the earth with any degree of accuracy when there has been a stratospheric aerosol injection spraying program of nano-particulates of aluminium, strontium and barium and this program has been going on in earnest for the last twenty years. Does this look normal to you?????? View attachment 125578
Oh, where is my little tin hat, little tin hat, little tin hat............................................

On your little tin head?
 
"Well, ice age didn't work. Global warming didn't work. Climate change didn't work. Let's try ice age again."

Let's look at your two "scientists" who predicted this ice age.

David Dilley, CEO of Global Weather Oscillations
--- An ex-weatherman guy who runs a denier blog.

Dr. Valentina Zharkova
--- Russian "ICE AGE SOON!" person, with no experience in climate science.

That is, two deniers. So, not news. Deniers have been predicting an ice age non-stop for the past 40 years. It never arrives, and it just keeps warming strongly, but that doesn't shake denier faith at all. They just feel that ice age is going to get here soon.

In contrast, the scientists have been predicting warming over those 40 years. They were proven right. That's why the scientists have so much credibility, because they've been getting everything right for 40 years now.

If you deniers want the same credibility, you have to stop failing at every single thing. That means you need to quit it with these constant ice age predictions.


So, if the planet is warming, how come we have what is called "Global dimming" where 20 percent less sunlight is reaching earth but yet they had to change the term from Global Warming to Climate Change because it wasn't adding up? You can't have it both ways. You can't gauge the temperature of the earth with any degree of accuracy when there has been a stratospheric aerosol injection spraying program of nano-particulates of aluminium, strontium and barium and this program has been going on in earnest for the last twenty years. Does this look normal to you?????? View attachment 125578
Oh, where is my little tin hat, little tin hat, little tin hat............................................


Debate me, punkinpuss......I will knock your ass so far out of the park that you will need to call up Uber to get a ride back. I know exactly of what I speak. You, on the other hand, don't know diddly squat and I can prove that you don't.
 
Silly ass, show me some evidence of those 'chemtrails' in peer reviewed journals. If this were true, don't you think that some scientists in some nations would be all over it? It is just more wingnut conspriracy theory from brain dead dingleberries.

http://io9.gizmodo.com/is-that-reflective-cloud-about-to-poison-you-and-change-1638680856

Here ya go...these are satellite photographs of nano heavy metal particulates beings used in conjunction with ionospheric heaters to manipulate the jet stream and change the directions of storm fronts. They can create high pressure zones and use them to crush low pressure zones. They haven't quite managed to create the lower rotations yet but they can suppress them. This is Tesla technology and in 1976, there was a U.N treaty signed where countries agreed to not use the manipulation of weather as a means of war. I guess you are unaware of the USAF document called "Owning The Weather By 2025....Full Spectrum Dominance" and using it as a force multiplier. You are a mere child when it comes to the knowledge of what the military industrial complex has at it's disposal that is (and this is a VERY conservative estimate) is at least 50 to 100 years ahead of what we are allowed to know. It's a fact.....so you were saying????


NASA Satellite Imagery Reveals Shocking Proof Of Climate Engineering
 

Forum List

Back
Top