“They come here to work and not for entitlements.”

Discussion in 'Immigration/Illegal Immigration' started by LilOlLady, Jan 30, 2013.

  1. LilOlLady
    Offline

    LilOlLady Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,583
    Thanks Received:
    617
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Ratings:
    +618
    “They come here to work and not for entitlements.”
    (Rep. Carlos Gutierrez)
    Like hell they do.

    Los Angeles County 'Birth Tourism' Complaints Spike

    1400/KTUC - [From ABC News]

    Prevent illegal immigrants from receiving federal benefits
    over $10 billion per year in federal government benefits go directly to illegal immigrants?
    Prevent illegal immigrants from receiving federal benefits

    Obama IRS refunds 'Illegals' $4.2 billion for kids--in Mexico
    NBC: Obama IRS refunds 'Illegals' $4.2 billion for kids--in Mexico - National Political Buzz | Examiner.com

    Anchor Babies Are Dragging America Down
    The purpose of this model legislation is to restore the original intent of the 14th Amendment, which is currently being misapplied and is encouraging illegal aliens to cross and cost American taxpayers $113 billion annually, or nearly $1,117 yearly per individual taxpayer.”
    Anchor Babies are Dragging America Down
     
  2. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Senior Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    5,536
    Thanks Received:
    460
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    FreedmensTown.com
    Ratings:
    +506
    What I want to know is
    A. if Republicans and conservatives don't want to pay for entitlements by people not paying into the system but dragging it down, claiming most of the budget is going toward that
    B. if Democrats and liberals don't want to pay any excess into the military defense budget especially not for the Iraq War they protested as costing billions per month

    then WHY can't members of both parties pay taxes for what they want to, and not for what they oppose? Why can't any part of the budget that reps disagree on be paid for by party, and only keep public what everyone agrees needs to be in the budget at a certain level?

    Why wouldn't this solve the problem if people can pay for health care who don't want to pay for war and vice versa????
     

Share This Page