The year is 1775,would Obama, Clintons & Hollywood be British Loyalists?

[JoeB131]

The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.

This is the dumbest thing that will be posted on the entire internet this day.

actually, it's accurate.

Slavery was banned in England in 1804 and banned throughout the Empire in 1830. If the rebellion had failed, we'd have ended slavery without a civil war in 1830.

The world would be better off for it.

 

[anotherlife]

The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.

You should read U.S. History before commenting.

No one like your country, food nor your women ( well usually on the women )

Apparently someone doesn't like their grammar either.

Awww, are you going to be the grammar and syntax police?

Truth is either Obama would have been a Slave or Free Slave during that time and shun by both the white and slave society.

Now I know you will cry about my grammar because you hate reality and believe America was never great until Obama became President and believe Obama would have set the world on fire back then but he would have been nothing...

No, Obama would have been an excellent pastor. Maybe even an investor. Black stock markets existed those days, until the federal government shut them down in the 20th century.

Maybe, maybe not but he most likely would have been born in slavery and shun.

White Master love child was never popular...

This would have been a lot harder, I agree. He would definitely not have made the White House.

 

[Flash]

The op has it backwards. Russia has infiltrated the American voting process and Trump and the GOP have turned a blind eye. Putin loves him some stupid Americans

I think we all know that the stupid America that Putin had pegged was that Crooked Hillary bitch that gave the Russians 20% of our uranium in exchange for a donation to the money laundering foundation and a nice speaking fee for Slick Willy.

 

[anotherlife]

I believe they would. George Washington would have had a fight on his hands as these Loyalists worked hard to place their new Queen on the throne in the U.S Monarchy they founded...

Works on the assumption that the Founders were the "good guys".

They were a bunch of rich slave owners who didn't want to pay their fair share, and they conspired with the French and Spanish (enemies of the crown) to do it.

The majority was actually against rebelling against England.

So I guess you could make that claim, if Trump had people as competent around him as Washington did to manage the aftermath.

He doesn't.

What do you call a fair share?

If the government raises your taxes by say 100 and everyone pays it under the penalty of the law, are you a thief of the fair share by questioning it?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.

This is the dumbest thing that will be posted on the entire internet this day.

actually, it's accurate.

Slavery was banned in England in 1804 and banned throughout the Empire in 1830. If the rebellion had failed, we'd have ended slavery without a civil war in 1830.

The world would be better off for it.

The hypocrisy and ignorance is mind blowing. Mel Gibsons film, The Patriot, is not history.

However intoxicating the heady rhetoric of ‘rights’ and ‘liberty’ emanating from Patriot orators and journalists, for the majority of farmers, merchants and townsmen in Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia (the vast majority of whom owned between one and five negroes), all-out war and separation now turned from an ideological flourish to a social necessity. Theirs was a revolution, first and foremost, to protect slavery.

 

[Auld Phart]

The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.

If I remember correctly, the first person to die in that war was a black man.

 

[anotherlife]

The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.

This is the dumbest thing that will be posted on the entire internet this day.

actually, it's accurate.

Slavery was banned in England in 1804 and banned throughout the Empire in 1830. If the rebellion had failed, we'd have ended slavery without a civil war in 1830.

The world would be better off for it.

The hypocrisy and ignorance is mind blowing. Mel Gibsons film, The Patriot, is not history.

However intoxicating the heady rhetoric of ‘rights’ and ‘liberty’ emanating from Patriot orators and journalists, for the majority of farmers, merchants and townsmen in Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia (the vast majority of whom owned between one and five negroes), all-out war and separation now turned from an ideological flourish to a social necessity. Theirs was a revolution, first and foremost, to protect slavery.

Amazing. In the 18th century, a war was needed to protect slavery from England. In the 21st century, England is going to a "war" to protect slavery from us. Isn't history an amazing subject?

 

[anotherlife]

The op has it backwards. Russia has infiltrated the American voting process and Trump and the GOP have turned a blind eye. Putin loves him some stupid Americans

I think we all know that the stupid America that Putin had pegged was that Crooked Hillary bitch that gave the Russians 20% of our uranium in exchange for a donation to the money laundering foundation and a nice speaking fee for Slick Willy.

That's only after the US bragged on the cover page of the Time Magazine about meddling and changing the latest Russian election. Hehehe.

 

[JoeB131]

What do you call a fair share?

If the government raises your taxes by say 100 and everyone pays it under the penalty of the law, are you a thief of the fair share by questioning it?

A fair share is "Paying for the things you are getting".

In the case of the Founding Slave Rapists, they were being asked to pay their fair share for the French and Indian War, which they instigated to a degree by attacking French holdings in North America. (The war was also being fought on a Global scale as the Seven Years War, but British involvement was more instigated by the colonists.)

 

[frigidweirdo]

I believe they would. George Washington would have had a fight on his hands as these Loyalists worked hard to place their new Queen on the throne in the U.S Monarchy they founded...

The funny thing is, the Founding Fathers were the Liberals, fighting the Conservatives who were the like of the British Monarchists.

 

[JoeB131]

The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.

If I remember correctly, the first person to die in that war was a black man.

you'd be wrong. The Boston Massacre was not part of the war.

 

[JoeB131]

The funny thing is, the Founding Fathers were the Liberals, fighting the Conservatives who were the like of the British Monarchists.

Not really.

You could make the argument that the British were the liberals, demanding payment for services, while the Colonists were the conservatives, not wanting to pay their fair share.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The funny thing is, the Founding Fathers were the Liberals, fighting the Conservatives who were the like of the British Monarchists.

Not really.

You could make the argument that the British were the liberals, demanding payment for services, while the Colonists were the conservatives, not wanting to pay their fair share.

You could, and you'd be wrong.

How many democracies were there in 1775? I'm going to guess not many.

The US Constitution was ground breaking for its time. It was completely against keeping things the same, which is conservatism (coming from the world CONSERVE).

Conservatism would have been remaining British. There are no two ways around it.

 

[Flash]

The op has it backwards. Russia has infiltrated the American voting process and Trump and the GOP have turned a blind eye. Putin loves him some stupid Americans

I think we all know that the stupid America that Putin had pegged was that Crooked Hillary bitch that gave the Russians 20% of our uranium in exchange for a donation to the money laundering foundation and a nice speaking fee for Slick Willy.

That's only after the US bragged on the cover page of the Time Magazine about meddling and changing the latest Russian election. Hehehe.

Was that before or after the DNC paid the Russians $12 million to create a false dossier on Trump? It is hard to keep up with the timeline.

 

[Two Thumbs]

The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.

This is the dumbest thing that will be posted on the entire internet this day.

actually, it's accurate.

Slavery was banned in England in 1804 and banned throughout the Empire in 1830. If the rebellion had failed, we'd have ended slavery without a civil war in 1830.

The world would be better off for it.

mmm no

england made you into indentured servants, nicer name for slave.

then bribed them to flee plantations to fight in the war, which, if england won, would have made them indentured servants real quick.

assuming they would even keep their word

 

[Two Thumbs]

The founders and modern leftist have nothing in common.

 

[anotherlife]

The op has it backwards. Russia has infiltrated the American voting process and Trump and the GOP have turned a blind eye. Putin loves him some stupid Americans

I think we all know that the stupid America that Putin had pegged was that Crooked Hillary bitch that gave the Russians 20% of our uranium in exchange for a donation to the money laundering foundation and a nice speaking fee for Slick Willy.

That's only after the US bragged on the cover page of the Time Magazine about meddling and changing the latest Russian election. Hehehe.

Was that before or after the DNC paid the Russians $12 million to create a false dossier on Trump? It is hard to keep up with the timeline.

This one had to be during Obama though.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The British freed the slaves. Obama would have had to be really dumb to fight for his slavers.

This is the dumbest thing that will be posted on the entire internet this day.

actually, it's accurate.

Slavery was banned in England in 1804 and banned throughout the Empire in 1830. If the rebellion had failed, we'd have ended slavery without a civil war in 1830.

The world would be better off for it.

mmm no

england made you into indentured servants, nicer name for slave.

then bribed them to flee plantations to fight in the war, which, if england won, would have made them indentured servants real quick.

assuming they would even keep their word

You are wrong. Those who fought for Britain were given freedom. No one is suggesting that altruism was behind the British actions but it did make it a fight to retain slavery rather than some bullshit about freedom.

 

[regent]

"For the framers of the Constitution were the most liberal thinkers of all the ages and the charter they produced out of the liberal revolution of their time has never been and is not now surpassed in liberal thought."
General Douglas MacArthur

 

[toobfreak]

I believe they would. George Washington would have had a fight on his hands as these Loyalists worked hard to place their new Queen on the throne in the new U.S Monarchy they founded...

Well, Barry would be ... ummm ... "working" for Bill.

With Barry's skill set I'm not sure there would ever be much work there he could do. Maybe food taster?