Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
- Thread starter
- #21
Unless of course it is the right wing version of health care reform?
"Fact - Increases in life expectancy are due to increased access to health care."
Well if no one pays for it how do you have increased access to health care?
How do you expect to get increased access to health care once the government starts saying you can't have it because it is too expensive?
See my above post.
My PRIVATE insurance company is already deciding my coverage was only good for a 1960s technology cast not a new one.
Oh, and the government tries not to turn a profit but to break even. If the post office was making billions they would lower the cost of stamps. If UPS was making billions their stock prices go up. Government programs do not have the fear of loss, that is a problem with them.
Buy a different policy.
Oops, you can't, because you do not get to choose who you buy insurance from. That is not the fault of the market, it is the fault of the government at the state and federal level making decisions about how you buy insurance, and what type of insurance you have to buy. How is putting more government in the mix going to enable you to get the cast you like?