The Taliban is another great example

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Taliban atrocities are another great example of why the right to self defense is the most basic and important human right.
This is the purpose of the 2nd amendment.
It is the right to self defense.
These Taliban Animals would not make it to the end of a street in America.
But the unarmed citizens of Afghanistan are defenseless and look what is happening to them.

 

[Meister]

That is a great example, thanks.

 

[Moonglow]

The Taliban atrocities are another great example of why the right to self defense is the most basic and important human right.
This is the purpose of the 2nd amendment.
It is the right to self defense.
These Taliban Animals would not make it to the end of a street in America.
But the unarmed citizens of Afghanistan are defenseless and look what is happening to them.

The anti-Taliban are making progress.

 

[2aguy]

The Taliban atrocities are another great example of why the right to self defense is the most basic and important human right.
This is the purpose of the 2nd amendment.
It is the right to self defense.
These Taliban Animals would not make it to the end of a street in America.
But the unarmed citizens of Afghanistan are defenseless and look what is happening to them.

It is funny that the monsters of the taliban are using the exact same talking points of the anti-gun extremists here in the U.S. and the rest of the West......they are taking guns from the Afghan people because now the Afghan people don't need them, the taliban will keep them safe..........

The same reasons used by the German government in the 1920s.........and other places around the world......

You don't need guns...we will keep you safe......now walk up to the edge of that trench and turn around....

 

[surada]

That is a great example, thanks.

The Taliban are Deobandi Muslims who came about because of British colonialism in India under the Tories.

 

[Augustine_]

The Taliban atrocities are another great example of why the right to self defense is the most basic and important human right.
This is the purpose of the 2nd amendment.
It is the right to self defense.
These Taliban Animals would not make it to the end of a street in America.
But the unarmed citizens of Afghanistan are defenseless and look what is happening to them.

The armed citizens of Afghanistan were equally defenseless

 

[2aguy]

The armed citizens of Afghanistan were equally defenseless

There are apparently groups already resisting the taliban....and that kind of thing is always easier if you have guns....

 

[2aguy]

The armed citizens of Afghanistan were equally defenseless

Hmmmmmmm....just wondering......

We have tanks.

We have jets and bombers.

We have nuclear weapons.

They have rifles and improvised explosive devices....

Who is leaving Afghanistan right now?

 

[Augustine_]

There are apparently groups already resisting the taliban....and that kind of thing is always easier if you have guns....

Cool, snowflake. Best of luck to them. We'll see who's left when the dust settles in one or two hundred years.

 

[2aguy]

Cool, snowflake. Best of luck to them. We'll see who's left when the dust settles in one or two hundred years.

Yep......but again.......without guns, the options are pretty much.....submit.

 

[Augustine_]

Yep......but again.......without guns, the options are pretty much.....submit.

Submit, just like the people with hundreds of thousands of guns did there.

 

[2aguy]

Submit, just like the people with hundreds of thousands of guns did there.

Not all of them.....but again.......without guns, there is only submission.

Hmmm...I wonder why the taliban is going around collecting guns from the Afghans, you know, since you don't think guns are important........

Again......

We have tanks.

We have jets.

We have nuclear weapons.

the muslim extremists had rifles and improvised explosives...

Who is leaving Afghanistan?

 

[Captain Caveman]

The Taliban atrocities are another great example of why the right to self defense is the most basic and important human right.
This is the purpose of the 2nd amendment.
It is the right to self defense.
These Taliban Animals would not make it to the end of a street in America.
But the unarmed citizens of Afghanistan are defenseless and look what is happening to them.

They're not unarmed but spineless. They give up their guns willingly when caught.

 

[whitehall]

The 2nd Amendment ain't gonna protect your sorry asses armed with an AR-15 if the Taliban gets a foothold in the U.S. Your greatest weapon is the voting booth to prevent a-holes like Biden from corrupting the Constitution.

 

[surada]

They're not unarmed but spineless. They give up their guns willingly when caught.

Afghanistan has had over 40 years of war. Healthcare, education and the country itself are all in shambles. Not only do you judge them, you predict their future.

Have you ever traveled outside the US?

 

[surada]

The 2nd Amendment ain't gonna protect your sorry asses armed with an AR-15 if the Taliban gets a foothold in the U.S. Your greatest weapon is the voting booth to prevent a-holes like Biden from corrupting the Constitution.

LOLOL. The Taliban is not a threat to the US.. Look at their track record.

 

[surada]

It is funny that the monsters of the taliban are using the exact same talking points of the anti-gun extremists here in the U.S. and the rest of the West......they are taking guns from the Afghan people because now the Afghan people don't need them, the taliban will keep them safe..........

The same reasons used by the German government in the 1920s.........and other places around the world......

You don't need guns...we will keep you safe......now walk up to the edge of that trench and turn around....

Hitler didn't confiscate guns.. Check your facts.

 

[2aguy]

Hitler didn't confiscate guns.. Check your facts.

Yes....dumb ass...he did..........you idiot.

 

[surada]

Yes....dumb ass...he did..........you idiot.

There is lots of information available.. Don't assume.

Hitler banned guns for Jews. The Weimar Republic already had strict gun control.

The Myth of Gun Control Under Hitler | National Vanguard

The Myth of Gun Control Under Hitler

by Dr. William L. Pierce A COMMON BELIEF among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school...

nationalvanguard.org

by Dr. William L. Pierce. A COMMON BELIEF among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school civics classes, do not trust their citizens and do not dare permit them to keep firearms.


H

 

[2aguy]

There is lots of information available.. Don't assume.

Hitler banned guns for Jews. The Weimar Republic already had strict gun control.

The Myth of Gun Control Under Hitler | National Vanguard

The Myth of Gun Control Under Hitler

by Dr. William L. Pierce A COMMON BELIEF among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school...

nationalvanguard.org

by Dr. William L. Pierce. A COMMON BELIEF among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school civics classes, do not trust their citizens and do not dare permit them to keep firearms.


H

Moron...you guys always bring that up, but never bother reading it...

There is lots of information available.. Don't assume.

Hitler banned guns for Jews. The Weimar Republic already had strict gun control.

The Myth of Gun Control Under Hitler | National Vanguard

The Myth of Gun Control Under Hitler

by Dr. William L. Pierce A COMMON BELIEF among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school...

nationalvanguard.org

by Dr. William L. Pierce. A COMMON BELIEF among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school civics classes, do not trust their citizens and do not dare permit them to keep firearms.


H

Wow.....talk about a Jew Hating link.....are you a Jew Hater?

From your link...

Jews, it should be noted, were not Germans, even if they had been born in Germany. The National Socialists defined citizenship in ethnic terms, and under Hitler Jews were not accorded full rights of citizenship. National Socialist legislation progressively excluded Jews from key professions: teaching, the media, the practice of law, etc. The aim was not only to free German life from an oppressive and degenerative Jewish influence, but to persuade Jews to emigrate.
-----

Germany was restored to full employment, degeneracy and corruption were rooted out, Jews and their collaborators were removed from one facet of national life after another, and the German people entered a new era of national freedom, health, and prosperity.
-----
History viewed through a Jewish lens — i.e., through media controlled by Jews — always is distorted in a way corresponding to Jewish interests and concerns.

I have constantly pointed out that registration first happened in the 1920s....later exploited by the national socialists to disarm Jews and the other political enemies of the national socialists...you doofus...

The national socialists took guns away from the people they planned on murdering, you idiot...

Now the truth...you idiot...

The difficult question is how to characterize the Nazi treatment of the Jewish population for purposes of evaluating Hitler's position on gun control. Truth is, the question itself is absurd. The Nazis sought to disarm and kill the Jewish population. Their treatment of Jews is, in this sense, orthogonal to their gun-control views. Nevertheless, if forced to take a position, it seems that the Nazis aspired to a certain relaxation of gun registration laws for the "law-abiding German citizen" – for those who were not, in their minds, "enemies of the National Socialist state," in other words, Jews, Communists, etc.

On Gun Registration, the NRA, Adolf Hitler, and Nazi Gun Laws: Exploding the Gun Culture Wars

Say the words "gun registration" to many pro-gun Americans and you are likely to hear that one of the first things that Hitler did when he seized power was to impose strict gun registration requirements that enabled him to identify gun owners and then to confiscate all guns, effectively...

scholarship.law.columbia.edu

And more....you doofus....

The time had come to launch a decisive blow to the Jewish community, to render it defenseless so that its “ill-gotten” property could be redistributed as an entitlement to the German “Volk.” The German Jews were ordered to surrender all their weapons, and the police had the records on all who had registered them. Even those who gave up their weapons voluntarily were turned over to the Gestapo.

This took place in the weeks before what became known as the Night of the Broken Glass, or Kristallnacht, occurred in November 1938. That the Jews were disarmed before it, minimizing any risk of resistance, is the strongest evidence that the pogrom was planned in advance. An incident was needed to justify unleashing the attack.
----

SS chief Heinrich Himmler decreed that 20 years be served in a concentration camp by any Jew possessing a firearm. Rusty revolvers and bayonets from the Great War were confiscated from Jewish veterans who had served with distinction. Twenty thousand Jewish men were thrown into concentration camps, and had to pay ransoms to get released.

How the Nazis Used Gun Control | National Review

The perennial gun-control debate in America did not begin here. The same arguments for and against were made in the 1920s in the chaos of Germany’s Weimar Republic, which opted for gun registration…

www.nationalreview.com

Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and 'Enemies of the State', by Stephen P. Halbrook

Based on newly-discovered, secret documents from German archives, diaries and newspapers of the time, Gun Control in the Third Reich presents the definitive, yet hidden history of how the Nazi regime made use of gun control to disarm and repress its enemies and consolidate power. The countless...

www.independent.org