The Stimulus, The DOE, and Solar Power

Well lookie here...solar panels are making our troops safer you fucking morons.

Solar Updates Marines' Arsenal

and look what the Brits are up to...

‘Solar Soldier’ Project Creating Power-Harvesting Uniforms for British Infantry

Oh, hot damn...here's China goddamn beating us AGAIN...(I'm a little tired of it, personally)

China's 'Solar City'

There is a big difference between tiny solar applications, and solar arrays poweful enough to either provide electricity for a house, or for a part of the grid. Something you just dont seem to get.

You mean like the solar city or the arrays that are powering our troops bases in Afghanistan? Like those? (which is making them SAFER)

The cleaning thing is also an issue, one you seem to ignore.

Again, you can't get something from nothing.

Nobody is saying you can, but we aren't even taking baby steps to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. The US, the "innovators" are WAY behind other countries in the use of renewable energy.

Cleaning? Really? That's your big hangup, cleaning?
 
Solar and wind energy are supplemental at best. It would be nice to employ that technology when building new house and such...when it's affordable. As far as a remedy to our energy needs, it's just not happening. They're not concentrated.
 
Solar and wind energy are supplemental at best. It would be nice to employ that technology when building new house and such...when it's affordable. As far as a remedy to our energy needs, it's just not happening. They're not concentrated.

Gee, so if it only supplies 30% of our nations power needs we shouldn't do it?

Keep throwing money away on that finite fuel source, oil? That makes SO much more sense... :rolleyes:
 
Solar and wind energy are supplemental at best. It would be nice to employ that technology when building new house and such...when it's affordable. As far as a remedy to our energy needs, it's just not happening. They're not concentrated.

Gee, so if it only supplies 30% of our nations power needs we shouldn't do it?

Keep throwing money away on that finite fuel source, oil? That makes SO much more sense... :rolleyes:

I said it would be nice when it's affordable. I plan on looking into geothermal, solar, and wind for my next house. Right now if I installed solar panels and a windmill it would take twenty years to recoup my costs. It's not worth it right now. Bring it down to five years and now we're talking. I have nothing against supplemental energy sources.
 
Last edited:
You mean like the solar city or the arrays that are powering our troops bases in Afghanistan? Like those? (which is making them SAFER)

There are no arrays powering our bases in Afghanistan. Read your link. The arrays are designed to recharge the batteries of the troops' personal gear. They're not powering tent city.
 
Solar and wind energy are supplemental at best. It would be nice to employ that technology when building new house and such...when it's affordable. As far as a remedy to our energy needs, it's just not happening. They're not concentrated.

Gee, so if it only supplies 30% of our nations power needs we shouldn't do it?

Keep throwing money away on that finite fuel source, oil? That makes SO much more sense... :rolleyes:
30%? Who told you that lie?

Solar and wind provide 1.3% of America's electricity.

Look at the table at the bottom. Solar thermal, solar photovoltaic, and wind provide 58.48 Terawatt/hours per year. Divide that by the total Terawatt-hours produced annually -- 4,369 -- and you get 1.3%.
 
Ha ha ha fucking ha. Solar power. obie doodle just increased his limo pool by 76%.. gore goes on aeroplanes and meech is frolicking on the taxpayers dime in Africa and how did she get there? Not by no ha ha ha fricking ha solar power.. Thanks asshole but no thanks. quit pissing our money away.

Germany has made a major commitment to solar power. We're finally doing something to catch up to them in many areas of renewable and clean energy.

Somebody explain to me why when the left pushes some kind of bonehead energy program through you hear so many of them say we are finally catching up to some European country.

To heck with europe when did they get so much better than the US.
 
You mean like the solar city or the arrays that are powering our troops bases in Afghanistan? Like those? (which is making them SAFER)

There are no arrays powering our bases in Afghanistan. Read your link. The arrays are designed to recharge the batteries of the troops' personal gear. They're not powering tent city.

yeah, they are

scr_101229-M-5423P-001.jpg



Marines Prove Energy Efficiencies in Afghanistan


Today, at least two forward operating bases in Afghanistan are powered entirely by solar energy, and several others get at least 90 percent of their energy from the sun. Marine Corps leaders are so pleased with the outcome that they’ve written renewable energy into training plans and doctrine -- something Charette said he hopes will become joint practice with other services.

Wow...looks like they ARE powering tent cities aren't they?
 
Solar and wind energy are supplemental at best. It would be nice to employ that technology when building new house and such...when it's affordable. As far as a remedy to our energy needs, it's just not happening. They're not concentrated.

Gee, so if it only supplies 30% of our nations power needs we shouldn't do it?

Keep throwing money away on that finite fuel source, oil? That makes SO much more sense... :rolleyes:
30%? Who told you that lie?

Solar and wind provide 1.3% of America's electricity.

Look at the table at the bottom. Solar thermal, solar photovoltaic, and wind provide 58.48 Terawatt/hours per year. Divide that by the total Terawatt-hours produced annually -- 4,369 -- and you get 1.3%.

Slow down, skippy and read it again. I said IF. I was not saying that we DO get 30% from solar, but that IF we did, why is that a bad thing.
 
You mean like the solar city or the arrays that are powering our troops bases in Afghanistan? Like those? (which is making them SAFER)

There are no arrays powering our bases in Afghanistan. Read your link. The arrays are designed to recharge the batteries of the troops' personal gear. They're not powering tent city.

There you go reading links again!:eusa_whistle:

It's all bullshit. If energy was the real concern there's enough in our own ground for about 500yrs at current levels. We can put RC cars on Mars for fuck sakes, don't tell me we can't burn it efficiently.
While we use this cheap energy, honestly develop alternatives, which I'm sure can be accomplished in a couple centuries.
JMO
 
Ha ha ha fucking ha. Solar power. obie doodle just increased his limo pool by 76%.. gore goes on aeroplanes and meech is frolicking on the taxpayers dime in Africa and how did she get there? Not by no ha ha ha fricking ha solar power.. Thanks asshole but no thanks. quit pissing our money away.

Germany has made a major commitment to solar power. We're finally doing something to catch up to them in many areas of renewable and clean energy.

I think we should genetically engineer some giant gerbils and build giant wheels for them to generate electricity.
 
Gee, so if it only supplies 30% of our nations power needs we shouldn't do it?

Keep throwing money away on that finite fuel source, oil? That makes SO much more sense... :rolleyes:
30%? Who told you that lie?

Solar and wind provide 1.3% of America's electricity.

Look at the table at the bottom. Solar thermal, solar photovoltaic, and wind provide 58.48 Terawatt/hours per year. Divide that by the total Terawatt-hours produced annually -- 4,369 -- and you get 1.3%.

Slow down, skippy and read it again. I said IF. I was not saying that we DO get 30% from solar, but that IF we did, why is that a bad thing.

IF the dog hadn't stopped for a shit he'd of caught the rabbit too!
 
30%? Who told you that lie?

Solar and wind provide 1.3% of America's electricity.

Look at the table at the bottom. Solar thermal, solar photovoltaic, and wind provide 58.48 Terawatt/hours per year. Divide that by the total Terawatt-hours produced annually -- 4,369 -- and you get 1.3%.

Slow down, skippy and read it again. I said IF. I was not saying that we DO get 30% from solar, but that IF we did, why is that a bad thing.

IF the dog hadn't stopped for a shit he'd of caught the rabbit too!

If my Aunt had testicles, well, she'd be my uncle.
 
You mean like the solar city or the arrays that are powering our troops bases in Afghanistan? Like those? (which is making them SAFER)

There are no arrays powering our bases in Afghanistan. Read your link. The arrays are designed to recharge the batteries of the troops' personal gear. They're not powering tent city.

yeah, they are

scr_101229-M-5423P-001.jpg



Marines Prove Energy Efficiencies in Afghanistan


Today, at least two forward operating bases in Afghanistan are powered entirely by solar energy, and several others get at least 90 percent of their energy from the sun. Marine Corps leaders are so pleased with the outcome that they’ve written renewable energy into training plans and doctrine -- something Charette said he hopes will become joint practice with other services.

Wow...looks like they ARE powering tent cities aren't they?
I stand corrected. That's cool. :)

Perhaps you should have posted that link earlier when you made the claim...?
 
Gee, so if it only supplies 30% of our nations power needs we shouldn't do it?

Keep throwing money away on that finite fuel source, oil? That makes SO much more sense... :rolleyes:
30%? Who told you that lie?

Solar and wind provide 1.3% of America's electricity.

Look at the table at the bottom. Solar thermal, solar photovoltaic, and wind provide 58.48 Terawatt/hours per year. Divide that by the total Terawatt-hours produced annually -- 4,369 -- and you get 1.3%.

Slow down, skippy and read it again. I said IF. I was not saying that we DO get 30% from solar, but that IF we did, why is that a bad thing.
IF the world was powered by unicorn farts, cherry pies would rain from the sky every morning.
 
You mean like the solar city or the arrays that are powering our troops bases in Afghanistan? Like those? (which is making them SAFER)

There are no arrays powering our bases in Afghanistan. Read your link. The arrays are designed to recharge the batteries of the troops' personal gear. They're not powering tent city.

There you go reading links again!:eusa_whistle:

It's all bullshit. If energy was the real concern there's enough in our own ground for about 500yrs at current levels. We can put RC cars on Mars for fuck sakes, don't tell me we can't burn it efficiently.
While we use this cheap energy, honestly develop alternatives, which I'm sure can be accomplished in a couple centuries.
JMO
The problem is the short-sighted enviro-nuts who want to eliminate fossil fuels before an economical, practical, and scalable alternative is developed.
 
Ha ha ha fucking ha. Solar power. obie doodle just increased his limo pool by 76%.. gore goes on aeroplanes and meech is frolicking on the taxpayers dime in Africa and how did she get there? Not by no ha ha ha fricking ha solar power.. Thanks asshole but no thanks. quit pissing our money away.

Germany has made a major commitment to solar power. We're finally doing something to catch up to them in many areas of renewable and clean energy.

Gemany ain't my idea of a role model. fuckwit.

Their economy is stronger than ours. Imagine that! And they're one of the dreaded European socialist countries!!!
 
Ha ha ha fucking ha. Solar power. obie doodle just increased his limo pool by 76%.. gore goes on aeroplanes and meech is frolicking on the taxpayers dime in Africa and how did she get there? Not by no ha ha ha fricking ha solar power.. Thanks asshole but no thanks. quit pissing our money away.

Germany has made a major commitment to solar power. We're finally doing something to catch up to them in many areas of renewable and clean energy.

Germany has an issue with land availible for the acerage they would need to use solar on a large scale, be it for photovolactics, or aimed energy thermal plants. At least in the US you have large areas of open unused land that can be converted to power generation.

But even here you have an issue, where the best land for solar is often some of our more fragile or beautiful ecosystems/natural terrains. Solar is a land hog, and I am suprised that hasnt been more resistance from people when you cover X acres of pristine desert will the crap you need to make a solar plant.

All energy generation has costs, despite what the people who beleive in the wind/solar fairies tell you.

One of the places that Germany is placing solar panels is along the autobahn.

Additionally, Europeans are in the process of developing an integrated wind power network.
 

Forum List

Back
Top