The special insanity of it all

[P@triot]

Another perfect example of how the Constitution saves lives and your fantasy about idiot liberal policy would cause deaths. This hatchet-wielding maniac would be fully compliant with the law under your absurd fantasy of being dictator over the U.S. And this man and everyone there would be dead since he is not a member of a "militia". But thankfully, the Constitution granted this person the right to protect himself and those around him.

Customer Steps Up to Stop a Hatchet-Wielding Masked Man From Wreaking Havoc at a 7-Eleven

 

[P@triot]

Thank God that Candy doesn't get to be the dictator she fantasizes about being. Otherwise this family wouldn't be able to protect themselves since none of them are in a "militia". But then again, preventing people from being able to defend themselves is her focus.

Family of Four Awakened by Man Shattering Windows and Kicking at Their Front Door. So Dad Pulls Out His 9mm Handgun and Heads Toward the Trouble.

 

[P@triot]

The amendment says “militia”. Sorry.

"No scholar or court has argued seriously that the Second Amendment guarantees a “right” to join or bear arms in the National Guard or a state militia – such organizations make their own recruitment and employment decisions. This argument, contrived in the 20th century to emasculate the Second Amendment, has never been taken seriously on the merits."

"Attorney General Ashcroft states that “the text and the original intent of the Second Amendment clearly protect the right of individuals to keep and bear firearms.”

"Ashcroft quotes George Mason at the Virginia ratification convention in 1788: “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people [...] To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

The Ashcroft letter continues: “As recently as 1986, the United States Congress and President Ronald Reagan explicitly adopted this view in the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act.” The act states, “The Congress finds that the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms under the second amendment to the United States Constitution [...] require additional legislation to correct existing firearms statutes and enforcement policies.” This finding was amply supported by The Right to Keep and Bear Arms, a 1982 report of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution. It found:

The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.

Rewriting the Second Amendment - Stephen P. Halbrook, Ph.D.

Ouch. This is a comprehensive beat down on your nonsensical and completely made up view of the U.S. Constitution.

 

[P@triot]

Bwahahahahaha!!!! Liberal lesbians rushing out in droves to buy firearms. Seems that libtards know what they won't admit: more guns = morse security. That being armed keeps people safe.



Gun sales surge among gays, lesbians after Orlando shooting

 

[P@triot]

Oh candycorn....



"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Seems even Barack Obama agrees that I need to have every single "military-grade" weapon that the U.S. military has in its arsenal. Bwahahahahahahaha!!!