I posted the full back and forth...so you can see.I last posted:okay let's do this overNothing you posted here negates -anything- I said.
As you have done nothing to address, much less negate, what I said, the only sound conslusion here is that you agree with me."The right of the people to keep and bear arms" covers a great many things - inarguably, self-defense is one of them. To place focus on one of thse great many things does not deny the existence, and does not diminish the importance of, the others.
Nothing you have posted negates this.
If you disagree, then please address what I said and show how it is not so.
Thank you very much.
you are arguing for an interpretation of words not contained in the 2nd amendment
Last edited: