Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Once more we have non-scientists such as Monkton and Watt lying and spreading misinformation before Congress. This time the scientists choose to reply.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Monckton-response.pdf
On May 6, 2010, Mr. Christopher Monckton testified by invitation to the Select Committee on
Energy Independence and Global Warming of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Mr. Monckton, who is not a scientist, gave testimony that was in stark contrast to that of the
scientists who were present at the hearing as well as the many official statements produced by the
worlds premiere scientific organizations, about the growing dangers of climate change.
Here, a number of top climate scientists have thoroughly refuted all of Mr. Moncktons major
assertions, clearly demonstrating a number of obvious and elementary errors.
We encourage the U.S. Congress to give careful consideration to the implications this document has
for the care that should be exercised in choosing expert witnesses to inform the legislative process.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Monckton-response.pdf
On May 6, 2010, Mr. Christopher Monckton testified by invitation to the Select Committee on
Energy Independence and Global Warming of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Mr. Monckton, who is not a scientist, gave testimony that was in stark contrast to that of the
scientists who were present at the hearing as well as the many official statements produced by the
worlds premiere scientific organizations, about the growing dangers of climate change.
Here, a number of top climate scientists have thoroughly refuted all of Mr. Moncktons major
assertions, clearly demonstrating a number of obvious and elementary errors.
We encourage the U.S. Congress to give careful consideration to the implications this document has
for the care that should be exercised in choosing expert witnesses to inform the legislative process.