If thats true how do you explain Russia hating Hillary and running a campaign against her and for Trump?
It's true because the second part of your sentence is 100% not true. Russia ran ads for Hillary - not "against" her as your ignorant, lying ass claims. And even extreme left-wing Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are both on record stating as much.
The infamous $100,000 Facebook ads that supposedly lead to Hillary Clintons defeat at the hands of “Kremlin linked” users have been leaked, and reveal the ads to be showing support for Hillary.
Your ignorance is mind-boggling. One would have to work to be as uninformed as you are. And I posted this story right here in this thread when it broke, so you have 0 excuse.

Facebook FAIL: 'Russian ads' were actually posts helping Hillary Clinton according to leak
Nice insult.
Zerohedge you believe?
The Austrian school of economics?
Laughed at by actual non ayn rand economists?
And practiced nowhere.
How can we believe anything you post?
Your socialist benefits are going to your head.
So because bill was an ahole the con is fine?
At least bill didn't pay hookers for his bj
 
Aides to the ex-president, Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation said Bill Clinton did not have any conversations about Rosatom or the Uranium One deal while in Russia, and that no one connected to the deal was involved in the trip.
Enjoy the video, sweetie... :lmao:


If thats true how do you explain Russia hating Hillary and running a campaign against her and for Trump?
It's true because the second part of your sentence is 100% not true. Russia ran ads for Hillary - not "against" her as your ignorant, lying ass claims. And even extreme left-wing Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are both on record stating as much.
The infamous $100,000 Facebook ads that supposedly lead to Hillary Clintons defeat at the hands of “Kremlin linked” users have been leaked, and reveal the ads to be showing support for Hillary.
Your ignorance is mind-boggling. One would have to work to be as uninformed as you are. And I posted this story right here in this thread when it broke, so you have 0 excuse.

Facebook FAIL: 'Russian ads' were actually posts helping Hillary Clinton according to leak
Can you post the text of the actual fake ad?
Your ref says they were not aimed at any political party
Keep up the Austrian economics!!
They are hilarious.
On another subject I guess you checked the cons statement today that he recommended killing OBL before 911?
Total lies to go with his 12000.
And you remain fixated on Hillary and Bill?
 
If thats true how do you explain Russia hating Hillary and running a campaign against her and for Trump?
It's true because the second part of your sentence is 100% not true. Russia ran ads for Hillary - not "against" her as your ignorant, lying ass claims. And even extreme left-wing Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are both on record stating as much.
The infamous $100,000 Facebook ads that supposedly lead to Hillary Clintons defeat at the hands of “Kremlin linked” users have been leaked, and reveal the ads to be showing support for Hillary.
Your ignorance is mind-boggling. One would have to work to be as uninformed as you are. And I posted this story right here in this thread when it broke, so you have 0 excuse.

Facebook FAIL: 'Russian ads' were actually posts helping Hillary Clinton according to leak
An absolute hoot.
I google your Duran site and am led to fake news sites
List of fake news websites - Wikipedia
Gateway pundit etc.
So now it's official?
I presume this is where you get your swill??
Hope this helps in your reading
 
We know that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to harm Hillary and help Trump

That is fact. It's not debatable. Putin admitted it in Helsinki

So your contention is that she orchestrated that effort to LOSE?

What is the air like on your planet?

As you know, there has been no proof, whatsoever, of any collusion. However, your desperation is duly noted.

Under whose administration did this alleged interference occur?

Who and what has Hillary Clinton, to this day, NOT blamed for her loss?

Here's the latest, just this week. The woman is dangerous!

"Hillary said during an appearance on Campaign HQ’s podcast with David Plouffe that she lost because of dark web MK Ultra."

“I think it’s going to be the same as 2016,” Hillary said. “I’m going to show you in these flashing videos that appear and then disappear and they’re on the dark web and nobody can find them, but you’re going to see them and you’re going to see that person doing these horrible things.”
I guess you saw where the justice dept finally said there was zero crimes?
Knees news didn't tell you?
 
We know that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to harm Hillary and help Trump

That is fact. It's not debatable. Putin admitted it in Helsinki

So your contention is that she orchestrated that effort to LOSE?

What is the air like on your planet?

As you know, there has been no proof, whatsoever, of any collusion. However, your desperation is duly noted.

Under whose administration did this alleged interference occur?

Who and what has Hillary Clinton, to this day, NOT blamed for her loss?

Here's the latest, just this week. The woman is dangerous!

"Hillary said during an appearance on Campaign HQ’s podcast with David Plouffe that she lost because of dark web MK Ultra."

“I think it’s going to be the same as 2016,” Hillary said. “I’m going to show you in these flashing videos that appear and then disappear and they’re on the dark web and nobody can find them, but you’re going to see them and you’re going to see that person doing these horrible things.”

Have you read the report.?
95% of repubs haven't
"There was not sufficient collusion proved (a non legal term) to say he was not guilty"
 
We know that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to harm Hillary and help Trump

That is fact. It's not debatable. Putin admitted it in Helsinki

So your contention is that she orchestrated that effort to LOSE?

What is the air like on your planet?

As you know, there has been no proof, whatsoever, of any collusion. However, your desperation is duly noted.

Under whose administration did this alleged interference occur?

Who and what has Hillary Clinton, to this day, NOT blamed for her loss?

Here's the latest, just this week. The woman is dangerous!

"Hillary said during an appearance on Campaign HQ’s podcast with David Plouffe that she lost because of dark web MK Ultra."

“I think it’s going to be the same as 2016,” Hillary said. “I’m going to show you in these flashing videos that appear and then disappear and they’re on the dark web and nobody can find them, but you’re going to see them and you’re going to see that person doing these horrible things.”

Was this one of sweaty treys 12 investigations?
Zero indictments?
 
If thats true how do you explain Russia hating Hillary and running a campaign against her and for Trump?
It's true because the second part of your sentence is 100% not true. Russia ran ads for Hillary - not "against" her as your ignorant, lying ass claims. And even extreme left-wing Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are both on record stating as much.
The infamous $100,000 Facebook ads that supposedly lead to Hillary Clintons defeat at the hands of “Kremlin linked” users have been leaked, and reveal the ads to be showing support for Hillary.
Your ignorance is mind-boggling. One would have to work to be as uninformed as you are. And I posted this story right here in this thread when it broke, so you have 0 excuse.

Facebook FAIL: 'Russian ads' were actually posts helping Hillary Clinton according to leak
A hoot.
Your Duran site led directly to fake sites
List of fake news websites - Wikipedia
Please don't rely on fake sites for you news.
And still no posts on the vagina grabber?
 
If thats true how do you explain Russia hating Hillary and running a campaign against her and for Trump?
It's true because the second part of your sentence is 100% not true. Russia ran ads for Hillary - not "against" her as your ignorant, lying ass claims. And even extreme left-wing Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are both on record stating as much.
The infamous $100,000 Facebook ads that supposedly lead to Hillary Clintons defeat at the hands of “Kremlin linked” users have been leaked, and reveal the ads to be showing support for Hillary.
Your ignorance is mind-boggling. One would have to work to be as uninformed as you are. And I posted this story right here in this thread when it broke, so you have 0 excuse.

Facebook FAIL: 'Russian ads' were actually posts helping Hillary Clinton according to leak
Didn't work, did they
 
We know that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to harm Hillary and help Trump

That is fact. It's not debatable. Putin admitted it in Helsinki

So your contention is that she orchestrated that effort to LOSE?

What is the air like on your planet?

As you know, there has been no proof, whatsoever, of any collusion. However, your desperation is duly noted.

Under whose administration did this alleged interference occur?

Who and what has Hillary Clinton, to this day, NOT blamed for her loss?

Here's the latest, just this week. The woman is dangerous!

"Hillary said during an appearance on Campaign HQ’s podcast with David Plouffe that she lost because of dark web MK Ultra."

“I think it’s going to be the same as 2016,” Hillary said. “I’m going to show you in these flashing videos that appear and then disappear and they’re on the dark web and nobody can find them, but you’re going to see them and you’re going to see that person doing these horrible things.”

No, the report said they couldn't get enough evidence to convict.
Hardly an exoneration
Try reading the report
 
If thats true how do you explain Russia hating Hillary and running a campaign against her and for Trump?
It's true because the second part of your sentence is 100% not true. Russia ran ads for Hillary - not "against" her as your ignorant, lying ass claims. And even extreme left-wing Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are both on record stating as much.
The infamous $100,000 Facebook ads that supposedly lead to Hillary Clintons defeat at the hands of “Kremlin linked” users have been leaked, and reveal the ads to be showing support for Hillary.
Your ignorance is mind-boggling. One would have to work to be as uninformed as you are. And I posted this story right here in this thread when it broke, so you have 0 excuse.

Facebook FAIL: 'Russian ads' were actually posts helping Hillary Clinton according to leak
A hoot.
Your Duran site led directly to fake sites
List of fake news websites - Wikipedia
Please don't rely on fake sites for you news.
And still no posts on the vagina grabber?
It always does.

Zerohedge is a Bulgarian/Russian troll site
 
If thats true how do you explain Russia hating Hillary and running a campaign against her and for Trump?
It's true because the second part of your sentence is 100% not true. Russia ran ads for Hillary - not "against" her as your ignorant, lying ass claims. And even extreme left-wing Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are both on record stating as much.
The infamous $100,000 Facebook ads that supposedly lead to Hillary Clintons defeat at the hands of “Kremlin linked” users have been leaked, and reveal the ads to be showing support for Hillary.
Your ignorance is mind-boggling. One would have to work to be as uninformed as you are. And I posted this story right here in this thread when it broke, so you have 0 excuse.

Facebook FAIL: 'Russian ads' were actually posts helping Hillary Clinton according to leak
A hoot.
Your Duran site led directly to fake sites
List of fake news websites - Wikipedia
Please don't rely on fake sites for you news.
And still no posts on the vagina grabber?
It always does.

Zerohedge is a Bulgarian/Russian troll site

And we should be surprised you know that?
 
There is no surprise at all to the educated and the informed that the Russian trail leads directly to the Democrats. Just look at the indisputable facts...
  • One of Barack Obama's primary foreign policy desires during his first term was to "repair" relations with Russia. It was at the top of his list and he campaigned on it. Eventually, he present Russia with a reset button.
  • While running for office a second time, Obama debates Mitt Romney who accurately predicts that Russia was the greatest geopolitical threat to the United States despite having none of the daily national security briefings that Barack Obama was privy to. In response, Obama mocks Romney stating "the 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back". Lead by Barack Obama, the Democrats still don't view Russia as a threat. Quite the contrary, they desperately want to suck up to them and yield to them on all global issues.
  • Once President Trump is elected president, there is suddenly a narrative about "Russian Collusion" despite every high profile Democrat acknowledging that not an ounce of evidence exists. So where does this narrative suddenly come from and why does it exist?
  • Democrats believe they land the "bombshell" when an email surfaces showing a meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and an attorney from Russia. Unfortunately for the Democrats, that backfires in a major way when pictures surface showing the Russian attorney is in the inner circle of the Obama Administration. Worse yet, evidence surfaces showing that Natalia Veselnitskaya (the Russian attorney) cold-contacted Donald Trump Jr. out of the blue. How does she get the personal contact information of a high-profile individual such as that? The answer, of course, is obvious - high level individuals within the Obama Administration.
  • But the bad news for the Democrats didn't stop there. Records show that the Obama Administration allowed Natalia Veselnitskaya into the country without a Visa. That is some damning evidence. Obviously she was here for nefarious purposes. It's looking more and more like for the express purpose of framing President Trump.
There is a treasure trove of Russian evidence now - and all of it leads directly back to the Democrats. It also matches the M.O. of how the Obama Administration operated during their reign of terror.

EXACTLY !!!
 
Aides to the ex-president, Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation said Bill Clinton did not have any conversations about Rosatom or the Uranium One deal while in Russia, and that no one connected to the deal was involved in the trip.
Enjoy the video, sweetie... :lmao:


I finally got around to watching
what A HOOT
nothing to do with uranium.
Its about a BJ?
Something our old white fart patriot is jealous and knows nothing about?.
I've always thought this was hilarious.
Do we know any guy who wouldn't lie about sex?
I haven't found one yet.
Its a shame patriot you never had one from your secretary.
You've Missed a lot.
 
Aides to the ex-president, Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation said Bill Clinton did not have any conversations about Rosatom or the Uranium One deal while in Russia, and that no one connected to the deal was involved in the trip.
Enjoy the video, sweetie... :lmao:


now ive had a second to think about it, you are posting a BJ video??
Do you know a guy who wouldn't lie about extra marital sex?
Know Gingrich had to recuse - he was getting one in his car while his wife was in hospital?
There were two other Livingston?
5 of the most embarrassing sex scandals involving socially-conservative Republicans
A long way from Uranium One?
 
We know that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election to harm Hillary and help Trump

That is fact. It's not debatable. Putin admitted it in Helsinki

So your contention is that she orchestrated that effort to LOSE?

What is the air like on your planet?

As you know, there has been no proof, whatsoever, of any collusion. However, your desperation is duly noted.

Under whose administration did this alleged interference occur?

Who and what has Hillary Clinton, to this day, NOT blamed for her loss?

Here's the latest, just this week. The woman is dangerous!

"Hillary said during an appearance on Campaign HQ’s podcast with David Plouffe that she lost because of dark web MK Ultra."

“I think it’s going to be the same as 2016,” Hillary said. “I’m going to show you in these flashing videos that appear and then disappear and they’re on the dark web and nobody can find them, but you’re going to see them and you’re going to see that person doing these horrible things.”

No, the report said they couldn't get enough evidence to convict.
Hardly an exoneration
Try reading the report
They could not get enough to charge much less convict. You are very fact absent.
 
I guess you saw where the justice dept finally said there was zero crimes?
Knees news didn't tell you?

Barr%20investigation-S.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top