The rumbling rightwing

Since a book is, apparently, more than conservatives can handle...not enough pictures I guess...here's a nice, simple web site...

Difference Between Communism and Liberalism | Difference Between | Communism vs Liberalism

Have you been a sanctimonious, self-righteous and condescending prick all your life?

LOL...selective criticism...how typical

No, it's very specifically directed toward you for your comments about books. I see this as a typical response from many on the left. They can't make their case so they always turn to the "you're too stupid to get what my enlightened mind understands".

That is why i said what I did.
 
I disagree a liberal would demand someone else read it for them
The Liberal would shred or burn it...or make the Author's life a living Hell.

The liberal would want the book banned and the author to go to sensitivity training.
That too. So much for the First Amendment unless you're an elitist piece of shit journalist working for a leftist outlet that wants to take the country down as well even though they don't fully understand it means themselves too.
 
They're partly right. When it comes down to it, the Tea Party will vote GOP over a commy Democrat any day. BUT...if there is a primary, they might lose there.

There are no similarities between Democrats and commies, but I'm not going to argue this red herring shat.

I humbly disagree. There are several clear similiarities. Both advocate total government control. Both claim to speak for the people when they really speak for self proclaimed elites. Both ignore human nature. Both advocate incredibly stupid ideas while claiming they are intellectually superior to everyone else.
 
I think the problem is that in the first three years of the Obama Administration, the National Debt had gone from a little over 10 trillion to 14 trillion. If God Forbid this moron gets two terms, he could double it at that rate.

The first trick to getting out of debt is to STOP SPENDING. It seems simple enough.

It is simple. But that's why Obama and his followers won't do it. Because it will actually fix the problems we are facing.
 
Andrew Reinbach: The Right Wing Crumbles

The purists that drove the right wing tide think they're within reach of their goal of shrinking the government, and are urging each other forward regardless of cost. In the process, they're ignoring political pros who thought the right could be controlled, and who now seem to know they need to chose country over party and survive, or party over country, and perish.

Looked at this way, there's really only one outcome here; the GOP will chose to survive and will survive, though chastened and diminished. Meanwhile, the extreme-right wing House freshmen who say they came to change Washington, don't care if they're re-elected, and have the votes to block any deal they don't like, will lose the former and get the latter.

The main driver of all this is the right's long determination to starve the beast and force the government to shrink, the evidence of how far they're willing to go being the fiasco over the national debt. The right's been telling us for 50 years that this was their goal; but it was so fantastic that nobody took them seriously.

Now, alas, we know better. I'll bet you all the money in my pockets that nobody over 30 ever imagined they'd see the day Republicans would ignore the interests of corporate America, but here we are. Not only are GOP freshmen in the House dismissing increasingly frantic calls from business to avoid default -- they don't even believe it would be a bad thing, much less the door to a global catastrophe.


I could help but notice this below from a link from that story

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/us/politics/17debt.html?_r=3&hp


Some Republicans say they do not worry much about being punished by their constituents for playing hardball with their votes on the debt limit and thus pushing the nation to the brink of default. And besides, they doubt that the consequences of a default would be as dire as Mr. Obama and many economists say.

Representative Jeff Landry, a freshman Republican from Louisiana, said, “I don’t believe, if we fail to raise the debt ceiling, that we will default.” Even if the debt ceiling is reached, Mr. Landry said, the government has more than enough revenue coming in each month to pay principal and interest on the debt.

That means they don't give a shat about the people that voted for them, they care more about their personal agenda, the Repugs and rightwingers in USMB will ignore this shat.

Let's test the "logic."

If there's more than enough money coming in to pay the principal and interest on the debt and we wouldn't default (the gov't fails to pay all its financial obligations), then why would we need to cut spending? Why would we need to continue to borrow money and/or sell T-bills to raise money?
 
You have it precisely backwards. These days, nothing distinguishes a Democrat from a commie. Nothing.

Yes there is. You can tell them apart by the pin they wear. Dems have a US flag, Commies a hammer and sickle. :lol:

I'm hoping you are just making a poor attempt at a joke and don't truly believe that liberals, progressives or Democrats are anything akin to Communists.

People who make comparisons of Democrats to "Commies" are as ridiculous as people who make comparisons of Republicans to Nazis or gays to pedophiles.

Are you honestly going to claim that when the President appointed openly communist people to his administration, when he appoints people who love communists, and frequently quote communists, that is simply evidence that it's ridiculous to compare Democrats to communists?

Tell me, what exactly do you think progressivism is? It''s the idealogy that we will become a communist nation slowly through evolution rather than revolution. What exactly do you think we were supposedly "progressing" to?

And liberals are merely the title progressive took when they lost power in the 1920s after being exposed as a danger to the American people.
 
I'm hoping you are just making a poor attempt at a joke and don't truly believe that liberals, progressives or Democrats are anything akin to Communists.

People who make comparisons of Democrats to "Commies" are as ridiculous as people who make comparisons of Republicans to Nazis or gays to pedophiles.


What's the difference between a "progressive" and a communist?

Means vs Ends.
 
Silly and often dangerous rhetoric.

Van Jones is not part of the Democratic Party?

Van Jones isn't a member of the Communist Party...but don't let that stop the silly rhetoric.

Of course he isn't. Communists realized years ago the only way they would get their radical agenda passed was to take over one of the main problems. That is why they took over the Democrat party years ago piece by piece.
 
Yes there is. You can tell them apart by the pin they wear. Dems have a US flag, Commies a hammer and sickle. :lol:

I'm hoping you are just making a poor attempt at a joke and don't truly believe that liberals, progressives or Democrats are anything akin to Communists.

People who make comparisons of Democrats to "Commies" are as ridiculous as people who make comparisons of Republicans to Nazis or gays to pedophiles.

Are you honestly going to claim that when the President appointed openly communist people to his administration, when he appoints people who love communists, and frequently quote communists, that is simply evidence that it's ridiculous to compare Democrats to communists?

Tell me, what exactly do you think progressivism is? It''s the idealogy that we will become a communist nation slowly through evolution rather than revolution. What exactly do you think we were supposedly "progressing" to?

And liberals are merely the title progressive took when they lost power in the 1920s after being exposed as a danger to the American people.

"You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism. We won’t have to fight you. We’ll so weaken your economy until you’ll fall like overripe fruit into our hands." --
~Nikita Khrushchev

*How True* This board is replete with them.
 
Yes there is. You can tell them apart by the pin they wear. Dems have a US flag, Commies a hammer and sickle. :lol:

I'm hoping you are just making a poor attempt at a joke and don't truly believe that liberals, progressives or Democrats are anything akin to Communists.

People who make comparisons of Democrats to "Commies" are as ridiculous as people who make comparisons of Republicans to Nazis or gays to pedophiles.

You may not have found it funny.... being a left winger.... but yea, it was a joke. It was mocking the accusation that the democrats are communists.

I'm kind of tired of Democrats and Republicans. Frankly, the country would be better off without all of you.

You're tired of everybody and at war with the whole world.
 
Since a book is, apparently, more than conservatives can handle...not enough pictures I guess...here's a nice, simple web site...

Difference Between Communism and Liberalism | Difference Between | Communism vs Liberalism

Have you been a sanctimonious, self-righteous and condescending prick all your life?

LOL...selective criticism...how typical

Grab a mirror. Look at your reflection and say 'selective criticism'. Funny how we can all see it in others, and rarely have the courage to recognize it in ourselves.
 
Van Jones is not part of the Democratic Party?

Van Jones isn't a member of the Communist Party...but don't let that stop the silly rhetoric.
He's at least a Socialist / Marxist...

You may thank me.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otM3pWOBWWk]‪Van Jones Communist‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]

Thank you for regurgitating debunked Glen Beck rantings? Good luck with that.

Van Jones WAS an "avowed" Communist. Operative word being the "was".

David Brock WAS a Republican.

The Democrats forgive past indiscretions.
 
Van Jones isn't a member of the Communist Party...but don't let that stop the silly rhetoric.
He's at least a Socialist / Marxist...

You may thank me.


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otM3pWOBWWk"]‪Van Jones Communist‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]

Thank you for regurgitating debunked Glen Beck rantings? Good luck with that.

Van Jones WAS an "avowed" Communist. Operative word being the "was".

David Brock WAS a Republican.

The Democrats forgive past indiscretions.
Messenger doesn't matter SeaBytch...The message by Van Jones however...does.

Wake up or put down the bong stupid.
 
Have you been a sanctimonious, self-righteous and condescending prick all your life?

LOL...selective criticism...how typical

No, it's very specifically directed toward you for your comments about books. I see this as a typical response from many on the left. They can't make their case so they always turn to the "you're too stupid to get what my enlightened mind understands".

That is why i said what I did.

Only the idiotic mind would try to equate Communism and Liberalism to begin with.

You know...historically, fascists always tried to devalue education.
 

Forum List

Back
Top