N
NewGuy
Guest
- Thread starter
- #41
Originally posted by Zhukov
I wasn't sure if it were possible, but you could quite well be less intelligent than newguy. Or perhaps it would be more accurate to say, you have a smaller capacity for reading comprehension.
We mock what we don't understand.
I was not trying to prove evolution. What I have done is presented information of how others have provided proof of the concept of natural selection of beneficial genetic changes in a species.
Now who can't read? That is not what this thread was about. It was about RELEVANCY of such data.
A theory becomes a theory only after repeated experimentation agrees with the original hypothesis, not before. Therefore, by the admission of everyone in this thread who has referred to evolution as a theory, they have affirmed that it is supported by repeatable experimentation.
Fine. A theory which PROVES nothing.
On further thought, I take one thing back; I should say you and newguy are equally inept at reading comprehension. There's really no reason for me to believe there exists a statistically significant difference.
If you could prove anything, or were even right, there would be no need to hurl insults when spoken to in a rational manner.
This proves the following:
1. You are wrong
2. You cannot prove your point
3. You are a sphincter
4. You know it.