P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 79,751
- 4,413
- 1,815
LOL !!!!!!!!!!! This has to be one of the more hilarious posts I've read here...apparently the essence of the establishment of the PLO entirely eludes you---as does the content of Resolution 181. The PLO was established as a political representative for the disenfranchised native population of Palestine---with the avowed aim of repatriating the land stolen by Zionists in 48...your conclusion that they relinquished claims to their own land is quite bewildering. As for 181...this was a non-binding recommendation, it did not contain a default clause that awarded land to the Jews should the native population vote it down...please attempt to educate yourself before posting gibberish...
Codger---if there is anyone confused here----it is you. The PLO----was established as a quaisi militant nationalist movement in OPPOSITION to the partition of the palestine mandate. The PARTITION of palestine does not involve THEFT Do you claim that MUSLIMS STOLE PAKISTAN from HINDU INDIANS? ----or perhaps you want to claim that the people of southern sudan STOLE southern sudan from ARAB MUSLIMS who rule from KHARTOUM. The PLO is an ARABIST organization----devoted to creating an 100% arab natiionalist middle east-----essentially ---a caliphate
The PARTITION of palestine does not involve THEFT
There was no partition. It was theft.