- Dec 5, 2010
- 100,131
- 36,163
- 2,290
This is just getting to be to damn funny.
That's because Dragon is the true non sequitur and in the true comedic sense.
Meister's statement that most read and contextually respond and that dragon didn't is a single logical extension and so how could it not follow?
Use of Non Sequitur Properly
Dragon misses the context, comes back and explains why he did not miss what he clearly missed.
Now that does not follow and is humorous, so it fits both requirements of a non sequitur.