And sentence structure is your friend. Nowhere can it be implied in that sentence that it was your intent to prove that I can't support the assertion. The way you wrote the sentence it quite clearly says it was the assertion itself that you disproved. If you need to change your story because you got caught, fine. Big vicotry for Larkin. I already admitted the former. I know you will do absoultely anything before admitting to makeing a mistake. I've passed the point of debating the issue. Now the point is to simply let your arrogance hang you. I think we're getting there.
Lmao...you don't think that me saying "I proved that you can't support your bullshit assertion" implies that it was my intent to prove that you can't support the assertion? This gets more amusing as I watch you squirm, while accusing me of changing my story. You are truly pathetic. By the way...as for the "do absolutely anything before admitting to making a mistake" I refer to you when I said you are correct. Instead of taking that in stride, as I did when you made a mistake and (after squirming for a while) finally admitted it, you are continuing, for reasons unknown, to act as if I have never admitted it. Its quite obvious I did to anyone with basic reading comprehension skills.