The James Comey Story

[roypatterson]

 

[roypatterson]

After watching this You Tube Video about former FBI Director James Comey, why would you believe anything he says. He has alread admitted to lying to Congress.

 

[Darkwind]

Sounds like an Oscar nomination for a lifetime movie.

"The James Comey Story"
"One woman's struggle against an oppressive dictator and her efforts to block the death of progressivism".

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Anyone thinking that former FBI Director James Comey’s upcoming testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee might be dull, or worried about Comey being a “fact witness” and promising not to engage in drawing conclusions … stop worrying. Instead, read Jim Comey’s amazing opening statement.

 

[bendog]

Anyone thinking that former FBI Director James Comey’s upcoming testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee might be dull, or worried about Comey being a “fact witness” and promising not to engage in drawing conclusions … stop worrying. Instead, read Jim Comey’s amazing opening statement.

There's gonna be a MOVIE! I'm thinking Russell Crowe

 

[g5000]

Trying to poison the well before he tesifies, eh?

You tards must be scared shitless of what he's going to say.

 

[bendog]

Trying to poison the well before he tesifies, eh?

You tards must be scared shitless of what he's going to say.

Ya blame him? I mean Bill pissed him off with meeting Lynch at the airport during his investigation, and look what he did to Hillary! (-:

 

[American_Jihad]

September 3, 2017
James Comey: Villain, apparatchik or fall-guy?
By Thomas Lifson


...

The thing to understand, what has always been the most important thing to understand, is that Jim Comey was out in front, but he was not calling the shots.
True enough, as McCarthy points out, President Obama made clear to the FBI and DoJ what their findings would be.

Let’s think about what else was going on in April 2016. I’ve written about it a number of times over the last year-plus, such as in a column a few months back: On April 10, 2016, President Obama publicly stated that Hillary Clinton had shown “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the [criminal statutes relevant to her e-mail scandal]). The president acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, its importance had been vastly overstated. This is precisely the reasoning that Comey relied on in ultimately absolving Clinton. (snip)

I’m baffled by complaints that Comey allegedly made “his” decision not to charge Clinton before key witnesses were interviewed. The main issue is not that witnesses hadn’t been questioned; it is that by April 2016, restraints were already in place to ensure that witness interviews would be fruitless, and that any incriminating information they accidentally turned up would be ignored or buried. The decision not to indict Hillary Clinton was not made by then-FBI Director Comey. It was made by President Obama and his Justice Department – Comey’s superiors.

...
If you want to say Comey went along for the ride rather than bucking the tide (as he concedes doing when Lynch directed him to call the Clinton probe a “matter,” not an “investigation”), that’s fair. But the fact that Comey already knew in April what he would say in July has long been perfectly obvious.

...

As we also now know – but as Obama knew at the time – the president himself had communicated with Clinton over her non-secure, private communications system, using an alias. The Obama administration refused to disclose these several e-mail exchanges because they undoubtedly involve classified conversations between the president and his secretary of state. It would not have been possible to prosecute Mrs. Clinton for mishandling classified information without its being clear that President Obama had engaged in the same conduct. The administration was never, ever going to allow that to happen.

...

Read more: Blog: James Comey: Villain, apparatchik or fall-guy?

 

[Reasonable]

After watching this You Tube Video about former FBI Director James Comey, why would you believe anything he says. He has alread admitted to lying to Congress.

Based on a biased video? Lol
Damn... you are an easy mark. Of course you are. You fell for a con man's bullshit.

 

[Reasonable]

September 3, 2017
James Comey: Villain, apparatchik or fall-guy?
By Thomas Lifson


...

The thing to understand, what has always been the most important thing to understand, is that Jim Comey was out in front, but he was not calling the shots.
True enough, as McCarthy points out, President Obama made clear to the FBI and DoJ what their findings would be.

Let’s think about what else was going on in April 2016. I’ve written about it a number of times over the last year-plus, such as in a column a few months back: On April 10, 2016, President Obama publicly stated that Hillary Clinton had shown “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the [criminal statutes relevant to her e-mail scandal]). The president acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, its importance had been vastly overstated. This is precisely the reasoning that Comey relied on in ultimately absolving Clinton. (snip)

I’m baffled by complaints that Comey allegedly made “his” decision not to charge Clinton before key witnesses were interviewed. The main issue is not that witnesses hadn’t been questioned; it is that by April 2016, restraints were already in place to ensure that witness interviews would be fruitless, and that any incriminating information they accidentally turned up would be ignored or buried. The decision not to indict Hillary Clinton was not made by then-FBI Director Comey. It was made by President Obama and his Justice Department – Comey’s superiors.

...
If you want to say Comey went along for the ride rather than bucking the tide (as he concedes doing when Lynch directed him to call the Clinton probe a “matter,” not an “investigation”), that’s fair. But the fact that Comey already knew in April what he would say in July has long been perfectly obvious.

...

As we also now know – but as Obama knew at the time – the president himself had communicated with Clinton over her non-secure, private communications system, using an alias. The Obama administration refused to disclose these several e-mail exchanges because they undoubtedly involve classified conversations between the president and his secretary of state. It would not have been possible to prosecute Mrs. Clinton for mishandling classified information without its being clear that President Obama had engaged in the same conduct. The administration was never, ever going to allow that to happen.

...

Read more: Blog: James Comey: Villain, apparatchik or fall-guy?

The American Thinker. Lol Now there's an unbiased source full of stellar journalism! Ha.

You idiots are trying so hard to not think about the deep deep shit your liar in chief is in. it will come soon enough and hit you like a ton of bricks.
The IRS is working with Bob Mueller and is looking DEEPLY into all of Trump's finances. I'm sure everything is legit, right? Roflmao

 

[Reasonable]

Brought to you by "Bill. "
Ha ha ha
You dumbfucs get more hilarious every day.

 

[blastoff]

Hillary broke the law and the matter of intent has nothing to do with it.

When a cop pulls you over for speeding and your defense is you hadn't intended to speed, would you expect the cop to keep a straight face while issuing you a citation?