teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
- 290
I've beaten atheists many times in my life. It's not as hard as you would think.
I shouldn't give up my secret but I will.
Here's the key. Atheists are hypocrites and because of that hypocrisy not nearly as smart as they think are.
How you say?
Well, let's take the way they demand HARD EVIDENCE for God. It you can't produce "evidence" God exists, then he can't.
BUT they treat Darwinism, Evolution, whatever you call it has hard fact.
Now HERE's the kicker, and this is how deceptive they are.
They say Creationism isn't "science" it's religion, BUT evolution is science.
But Creationism is not about Evolution it's about how life BEGAN. But atheists/evolutionists have NO HARD EVIDENCE for how life began. IN FACT, there isn't ANY HARD EVIDENCE for how life began.
There's only theories. Now theories are wonderful and atheists will go nuts twisting themselves into pretzels insisting that a theory is "proof" of how life began, BUT IT'S NOT.
Now why do they do that. Because then they would have to admit their "science" on how life began, has no more validity than Creationism, and therefore THEY ARE BOTH EQUAL AS THEORIES.
THEY CANNOT admit that. But press them on it and they will finally admit that how life began isn't EVEN really IN the theory of evolution. Why? Because no one KNOW how we really got here. That's why there are so many competing theories including the "alien seed" theory. No one really knows 100%.
Which means, it's all faith that your "theory" is correct. And Creationism is faith as well.
Atheists cannot admit that. That would mean they aren't any smarter or their beliefs have any more validity than those pesky Christians. They will twist themselves into pretzels rather than admit it.
But see how they create a double standard? They cite evolution as proof there is no God, but when pressed on it, will admit evolution doesn't even cover how life began. So how can it prove there is no God?
Answer: It can't!
Well run on posts are boring, so in my second post, I'll address the second double standard of atheism.
I shouldn't give up my secret but I will.
Here's the key. Atheists are hypocrites and because of that hypocrisy not nearly as smart as they think are.
How you say?
Well, let's take the way they demand HARD EVIDENCE for God. It you can't produce "evidence" God exists, then he can't.
BUT they treat Darwinism, Evolution, whatever you call it has hard fact.
Now HERE's the kicker, and this is how deceptive they are.
They say Creationism isn't "science" it's religion, BUT evolution is science.
But Creationism is not about Evolution it's about how life BEGAN. But atheists/evolutionists have NO HARD EVIDENCE for how life began. IN FACT, there isn't ANY HARD EVIDENCE for how life began.
There's only theories. Now theories are wonderful and atheists will go nuts twisting themselves into pretzels insisting that a theory is "proof" of how life began, BUT IT'S NOT.
Now why do they do that. Because then they would have to admit their "science" on how life began, has no more validity than Creationism, and therefore THEY ARE BOTH EQUAL AS THEORIES.
THEY CANNOT admit that. But press them on it and they will finally admit that how life began isn't EVEN really IN the theory of evolution. Why? Because no one KNOW how we really got here. That's why there are so many competing theories including the "alien seed" theory. No one really knows 100%.
Which means, it's all faith that your "theory" is correct. And Creationism is faith as well.
Atheists cannot admit that. That would mean they aren't any smarter or their beliefs have any more validity than those pesky Christians. They will twist themselves into pretzels rather than admit it.
But see how they create a double standard? They cite evolution as proof there is no God, but when pressed on it, will admit evolution doesn't even cover how life began. So how can it prove there is no God?
Answer: It can't!
Well run on posts are boring, so in my second post, I'll address the second double standard of atheism.
Last edited: