RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
I support "Civil Unions". Have I answered your question?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your incapable of reading I assume. I have NEVER lived in Utah. Let me be clear just for you, I live in North Carolina.
I will even stipulate the city, since anyone with any knowledge of the Marine Corps would already know. I Live in Jacksonville NC.
Now if your going to find me a shrink, I can easily travel to New Bern and Wilmington. I guess I could get to Morehead City also And ECU has a huge medical school , they are about the same distance.
Pay for my gas and I will even drive to Raleigh or Durham.
Since you will be paying I am sure you can arrange for the shrink to report his findings to you. On the particular issue of insanity because of religion I will gladly sign a waiver for that purpose.
Faster than a speeding bullet! More powerful than a locomotive! Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound. Look, up in the sky! Is it a bird?! Is it a plane?! its Captain Underpants!
Yes, its Captain Underpants, strange visitor from Planet Mormon who thinks he came to earth with powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal men.
Captain Underpants, who can confound the minds of mighty Christians, beat-up Aussies with his bare hands, and who, disguised as Gomer Piles wild-mannered Marine from North Carolina fights a never-ending battle for Truth, Justice, and the American Mormon way!
It does. Anal sex is far more destructive of cell linings than vaginal sex, making it easier for infections to spread. AIDS was spread by homosexual anal sex. As David Horowitz has said, the failure to acknowledge this is putting ideology over physiology.
By definition, it knocks it down a few pegs, which is exactly what the subverters want. Understand: they want to make a MOCKERY of what they consider to be an outdated, fascist practice, and since they can't ban it outright, they'll work to make it look silly. They are winning this battle. Just watch "Married With Children".
"Equal access" is best justified by actualy equality. Homosexual couples are not the "equal" of a normal couple. Saying "it is simply about fairness" is typical liberal circular reasoning. Oh, it is? Well then, who can be against it? Other things that are "simply about fairness": high taxes, overregulation, letting criminals go, etc.
LOOK AT THE DAMN PICTURE AT THE START OF THIS THREAD! This child as football is self-evident. "Mary and Heather" know exactly what happens when they pull him out: someone starts a thread on a chatboard to "prove" that homosexuality is a family value! As for Melissa Etheridge, how do you know about this in the first place? If she weren't making a deal of it, you wouldn't know about it to begin with.
AIDS was spread by homosexual anal sex.
Hetero couples have buttsex too. Some of them even swing and swap and all kinds of crazy, high-risk things. This is irrelevant to any discussion of equal protection. Besides, if gay sex is so disease-prone, you'd think you'd want to encourage monogamy in gay couples by letting them marry each otherIt does. Anal sex is far more destructive of cell linings than vaginal sex, making it easier for infections to spread. AIDS was spread by homosexual anal sex. As David Horowitz has said, the failure to acknowledge this is putting ideology over physiology.
Homosexual couples are not the "equal" of a normal couple.
Gay couples are equal to heterosexual couples. The only difference (and it is an insignificant difference) is that they can’t reproduce.
Hetero couples have buttsex too. Some of them even swing and swap and all kinds of crazy, high-risk things. This is irrelevant to any discussion of equal protection. Besides, if gay sex is so disease-prone, you'd think you'd want to encourage monogamy in gay couples by letting them marry each other
.
In your personal, bigoted, wrong-headed opinion.
Hetero couples have buttsex too. Some of them even swing and swap and all kinds of crazy, high-risk things. This is irrelevant to any discussion of equal protection. Besides, if gay sex is so disease-prone, you'd think you'd want to encourage monogamy in gay couples by letting them marry each other
.
In your personal, bigoted, wrong-headed opinion.
I support "Civil Unions". Have I answered your question?
Wow. Okay. Im surprised. For some reason, I thought that you would oppose it. Cool.
Oh, THAT little difference. Sheesh, what a minor matter! And here I was all worked up. Silly me!
Other insignificant differences we shouldn't fuss over:
The USA and China are equal countries, except that one is in a different place from the other, and the border going around them is in slightly different shapes.
Men and women are the same, except for some parts in the middle. Other than that, the exact same thing. Exactly the same.
The Earth and Venus are just one space away from the Sun. So it's like, pretty much the same planet. Only a racist would disagree.
What legal age consenting adults do with one another is none of my buisiness, as long as it is not in public ( and no I don't mean hugging and light kissing) It is also none of my concern who consenting adults chose to cohabitat with. However it IS my concern that the Institute of marriage remain what it has always been.
I also would NOT oppose a move to remove "marriage" from Government control, leaving it to churches to determine whom to marriage. The Government,as has been mentioned needs to codify unions though, so I would not oppose a move to have Government ONLY sanction Civil unions.
Would you support civil unions if they gave gay couples every single legal privilege enjoyed by married couples?
"Homosexuality is a disease, like alcoholism" -Trent Lott (R)
LOOK AT THE DAMN PICTURE AT THE START OF THIS THREAD! This child as football is self-evident. "Mary and Heather" know exactly what happens when they pull him out: someone starts a thread on a chatboard to "prove" that homosexuality is a family value! As for Melissa Etheridge, how do you know about this in the first place? If she weren't making a deal of it, you wouldn't know about it to begin with.
Who is treating her like a political football and who is treating her like a human being. Check this out:
http://www.americablog.com/2007/05/concerned-women-for-america-spokesman.html
Concerned Women for America spokesman blasts Mary Cheney and girlfriend as just "playing house," not "real parents," birth of son is "tragedy"