The Hardcore Right - It'll get worse before it gets better

[jillian]

Do you believe anything you're told? The Newtown shooting occurred on Dec. 14th. Since that time, Obama has issued.....ZERO Executive Orders. ZERO. NONE.

Barack Obama Executive Orders Disposition Tables

The difference is largely semantically and only there to provide wiggle room for a weasel such as yourself. In fact:

'In at least one instance, a federal district court seemed to use the two terms interchangeably.'

Obama Did Not Sign 23 Executive Orders -- Daily Intelligencer

Obama of course backed down, but got the photo-op you could whack off to.

Even so, 3 memorandum do not equate to 23 Executive Orders and none of them are a power grab or usurpation of the Constitution.

It would help if you Nutter's actually knew what an EO is, but it doesn't matter, does it? Like Pavlov's dog, you're so conditioned that when somebody mentions "executive order," off you go on another panicked OMG! OBAMA! screaming fit.

that's not quite true.

they had no problem with them when they were issued by shrub.

 

[buckeye45_73]

It is the same "Obama is Arab" crowd that John McCain rebuked and Sarah Palin embraced.

They are the ones who boo gay soldiers, cheer over executions and scream "Let em die" as a solution to healthcare. There are Republican snake oil salesmen (Rush, Beck, Hannity...) who make millions off of these people

Dems just sit back, smirk and remind people...This is what Republicans are like

omg, you all think so highly of yourselves and Democrats..
we watched your kind poop on police cars and take over and destroy the people's property

you people crack me the hell up

No one pooped on police cars, only idiots like yourself believe this.

Vietnam protestors did, and OWS folks did

Occupy Wall Street: Shocking photos show protester defecating on POLICE CAR | Mail Online

I love to own bitches like you...you're like the idiot that posts shit on facebook and doesnt think anyone will find out about it.....

 

[SniperFire]

Do you believe anything you're told? The Newtown shooting occurred on Dec. 14th. Since that time, Obama has issued.....ZERO Executive Orders. ZERO. NONE.

Barack Obama Executive Orders Disposition Tables

The difference is largely semantically and only there to provide wiggle room for a weasel such as yourself. In fact:

'In at least one instance, a federal district court seemed to use the two terms interchangeably.'

Obama Did Not Sign 23 Executive Orders -- Daily Intelligencer

Obama of course backed down, but got the photo-op you could whack off to.

Even so, 3 memorandum do not equate to 23 Executive Orders and none of them are a power grab or usurpation of the Constitution.

It would help if you Nutter's actually knew what an EO is, but it doesn't matter, does it? Like Pavlov's dog, you're so conditioned that when somebody mentions "executive order," off you go on another panicked OMG! OBAMA! screaming fit.

Again, Obama did indeed piss his pants and backed down, but it is no coincidence that he and his rabid media use 'executive order' and 'executive action' interchangeable.

Here is another example:

NBC News: Obama's Executive Orders Mostly About Politics | RealClearPolitics

 

[Oldguy]

The difference is largely semantically and only there to provide wiggle room for a weasel such as yourself. In fact:

'In at least one instance, a federal district court seemed to use the two terms interchangeably.'

Obama Did Not Sign 23 Executive Orders -- Daily Intelligencer

Obama of course backed down, but got the photo-op you could whack off to.

Even so, 3 memorandum do not equate to 23 Executive Orders and none of them are a power grab or usurpation of the Constitution.

It would help if you Nutter's actually knew what an EO is, but it doesn't matter, does it? Like Pavlov's dog, you're so conditioned that when somebody mentions "executive order," off you go on another panicked OMG! OBAMA! screaming fit.

Again, Obama did indeed piss his pants and backed down, but it is no coincidence that he and his rabid media use 'executive order' and 'executive action' interchangeable.

Here is another example:

NBC News: Obama's Executive Orders Mostly About Politics | RealClearPolitics

Backed down? Oh, really? Bet you can't prove it. Just because he didn't come screaming for your guns, as the Nutter's claimed, doesn't mean he "backed down." It just means he followed the Constitution, as any rational, sane person knew he would.

 

[rightwinger]

Only won 70 seats in 2010.

70 seats in the Senate? Bull Shit

70 Seats in Congress.

Total BlowOut.

Which has what to do with the Republicans flubbing away the Senate?

 

[Katzndogz]

The nation is dividing. Not only philosophically but physically as well. As democrats become more and more odious, what they have to ask themselves is if the nation can limp along with such a large percentage of the population who does not support the nation they are making?

 

[SniperFire]

Even so, 3 memorandum do not equate to 23 Executive Orders and none of them are a power grab or usurpation of the Constitution.

It would help if you Nutter's actually knew what an EO is, but it doesn't matter, does it? Like Pavlov's dog, you're so conditioned that when somebody mentions "executive order," off you go on another panicked OMG! OBAMA! screaming fit.

Again, Obama did indeed piss his pants and backed down, but it is no coincidence that he and his rabid media use 'executive order' and 'executive action' interchangeable.

Here is another example:

NBC News: Obama's Executive Orders Mostly About Politics | RealClearPolitics

Backed down? Oh, really? Bet you can't prove it. Just because he didn't come screaming for your guns, as the Nutter's claimed, doesn't mean he "backed down." It just means he followed the Constitution, as any rational, sane person knew he would.

LOL


Obama hints at "steps" for bypassing Congress on guns

Obama hints at "steps" for bypassing Congress on guns - CBS News


“The president is going to act,” Mr. Biden said. “There are executive orders, executive action that can be taken. We haven’t decided what that is yet, but we’re compiling it all.”

http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/09/executive-action-on-guns/


Obama: ‘I’ll Use Whatever Power This Office Holds’ In An Effort To Prevent Another Newtown Massacre

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20...n-effort-to-prevent-another-newtown-massacre/

 

[CrusaderFrank]

70 seats in the Senate? Bull Shit

70 Seats in Congress.

Total BlowOut.

Which has what to do with the Republicans flubbing away the Senate?

I don't know how you consider a 70 swing "flubbing"

 

[Katzndogz]

Some of obama's 23 executive orders were nonsense. One of his orders is that he will use an executive order, to order himself to appoint a director of the ATF. It's nonsense, but it is nonsense that the democrats buy.

 

[Oldguy]

Again, Obama did indeed piss his pants and backed down, but it is no coincidence that he and his rabid media use 'executive order' and 'executive action' interchangeable.

Here is another example:

NBC News: Obama's Executive Orders Mostly About Politics | RealClearPolitics

Backed down? Oh, really? Bet you can't prove it. Just because he didn't come screaming for your guns, as the Nutter's claimed, doesn't mean he "backed down." It just means he followed the Constitution, as any rational, sane person knew he would.

LOL


Obama hints at "steps" for bypassing Congress on guns

Obama hints at "steps" for bypassing Congress on guns - CBS News


“The president is going to act,” Mr. Biden said. “There are executive orders, executive action that can be taken. We haven’t decided what that is yet, but we’re compiling it all.”

Biden Hints Obama Will Take Executive Action on Guns - NYTimes.com


Obama: ‘I’ll Use Whatever Power This Office Holds’ In An Effort To Prevent Another Newtown Massacre

Obama: 'I?ll Use Whatever Power This Office Holds' In An Effort To Prevent Another Newtown Massacre | ThinkProgress

Y'all get your stories straight. Either Obama is a tyrant for issuing 23 executive orders, or he backed down because he DIDN'T issue 23 executive orders.

It can't be both ways.

 

[rightwinger]

70 Seats in Congress.

Total BlowOut.

Which has what to do with the Republicans flubbing away the Senate?

I don't know how you consider a 70 swing "flubbing"

You are going to have to show where Republicans took 70 Seats in the Senate

Or else learn the differences between the two houses

 

[SniperFire]

Backed down? Oh, really? Bet you can't prove it. Just because he didn't come screaming for your guns, as the Nutter's claimed, doesn't mean he "backed down." It just means he followed the Constitution, as any rational, sane person knew he would.

LOL


Obama hints at "steps" for bypassing Congress on guns

Obama hints at "steps" for bypassing Congress on guns - CBS News


“The president is going to act,” Mr. Biden said. “There are executive orders, executive action that can be taken. We haven’t decided what that is yet, but we’re compiling it all.”

Biden Hints Obama Will Take Executive Action on Guns - NYTimes.com


Obama: ‘I’ll Use Whatever Power This Office Holds’ In An Effort To Prevent Another Newtown Massacre

Obama: 'I?ll Use Whatever Power This Office Holds' In An Effort To Prevent Another Newtown Massacre | ThinkProgress

Y'all get your stories straight. Either Obama is a tyrant for issuing 23 executive orders, or he backed down because he DIDN'T issue 23 executive orders.

It can't be both ways.

But you deflect. LOL

Is Obama's statement that he will 'USE WHATEVER POWER THIS OFFICE HOLDS' a DIRECT allusion to the Executive Order, or not?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

 

[JakeStarkey]

The crazy division pimps are from the ultra irresponsible right and libertarian wings.

 

[Mac1958]

.

Radio hosts Michael Medved and Mike Rosen (KOA/Denver) are both conservative talk show hosts who avoid the whacked-out hyperbole practiced by the Limbaughs, Levins, Savages, Becks and Hannitys (the division pimps) of the world. So while they're committed partisans, they at least make the effort to be thoughtful, mature and reasonable.

In the last couple of days, however, they both had to deal with hardcore conservative callers who have been driven so over the top by their ideology (and, most likely, the aforementioned division pimps) that the talk show hosts were clearly embarrassed and had to disavow the callers.

In both cases, the talk show hosts were discussing gun control. And in both cases, the callers went into angry tirades about Obama. To paraphrase, both said something like "we all know that Marxist communist is gonna try to take our guns, and when he does, we're gonna defend ourselves against all those socialists who think they can destroy Amurrrrica." Something like that.

In both cases, the host sighed and paused, trying to find a way to respond quickly and respectfully. They then politely disagreed with the caller and moved on. I can only imagine what was going through their head, but I suspect it was something like "how do we get rid of these people?"...

Thing is, these people aren't going away. We see them here on this board, and they really believe the stuff they say. It's not a game. And they're so blinded that they don't realize how this is looking, what damage it's causing their own side.

They have to be marginalized, but how? I don't see how you get from here to there.

.

Two words come to mind....Alan Berg.

Wow, flashback. I live in Colorado, and I remember exactly where I was the moment I heard he had been shot.

That's a fair point. The Levins and Savages and Becks get these people all fired up, and I guess it would not be terribly surprising if one or more of them did something with their rage and their fear.

All the more important it is then, that the crazies are marginalized asap. The division pimps need to cool it off, for example, but it's like asking a politician to vote for term limits - if they suddenly stopped the hyperbole and became reasonable and adult and civil, they'd be shooting themselves in the foot.

So to speak.

.

 

[whitehall]

I don't have a clue about the names of liberal talk show hosts and I couldn't care less. Why is the left so hysterical about right wing talk show hosts? Dumb assed pop-culture educated liberal sissies don't have the skill to argue a point so they cut and paste hate speech.

 

[Darkwind]

.

Radio hosts Michael Medved and Mike Rosen (KOA/Denver) are both conservative talk show hosts who avoid the whacked-out hyperbole practiced by the Limbaughs, Levins, Savages, Becks and Hannitys (the division pimps) of the world. So while they're committed partisans, they at least make the effort to be thoughtful, mature and reasonable.

In the last couple of days, however, they both had to deal with hardcore conservative callers who have been driven so over the top by their ideology (and, most likely, the aforementioned division pimps) that the talk show hosts were clearly embarrassed and had to disavow the callers.

In both cases, the talk show hosts were discussing gun control. And in both cases, the callers went into angry tirades about Obama. To paraphrase, both said something like "we all know that Marxist communist is gonna try to take our guns, and when he does, we're gonna defend ourselves against all those socialists who think they can destroy Amurrrrica." Something like that.

In both cases, the host sighed and paused, trying to find a way to respond quickly and respectfully. They then politely disagreed with the caller and moved on. I can only imagine what was going through their head, but I suspect it was something like "how do we get rid of these people?"...

Thing is, these people aren't going away. We see them here on this board, and they really believe the stuff they say. It's not a game. And they're so blinded that they don't realize how this is looking, what damage it's causing their own side.

They have to be marginalized, but how? I don't see how you get from here to there.

.

Then they really aren't conservatives. That wacked-out hyperbole you speak of is simply the truth. You just happen to be so extreme in your left-wing nutjob beliefs that you cannot even make an anonymous post on and internet forum without attacking and belittling people who disagree with you.

And you call the GOP, Limbaugh and the rest out of touch?

 

[Ringel05]

.

Radio hosts Michael Medved and Mike Rosen (KOA/Denver) are both conservative talk show hosts who avoid the whacked-out hyperbole practiced by the Limbaughs, Levins, Savages, Becks and Hannitys (the division pimps) of the world. So while they're committed partisans, they at least make the effort to be thoughtful, mature and reasonable.

In the last couple of days, however, they both had to deal with hardcore conservative callers who have been driven so over the top by their ideology (and, most likely, the aforementioned division pimps) that the talk show hosts were clearly embarrassed and had to disavow the callers.

In both cases, the talk show hosts were discussing gun control. And in both cases, the callers went into angry tirades about Obama. To paraphrase, both said something like "we all know that Marxist communist is gonna try to take our guns, and when he does, we're gonna defend ourselves against all those socialists who think they can destroy Amurrrrica." Something like that.

In both cases, the host sighed and paused, trying to find a way to respond quickly and respectfully. They then politely disagreed with the caller and moved on. I can only imagine what was going through their head, but I suspect it was something like "how do we get rid of these people?"...

Thing is, these people aren't going away. We see them here on this board, and they really believe the stuff they say. It's not a game. And they're so blinded that they don't realize how this is looking, what damage it's causing their own side.

They have to be marginalized, but how? I don't see how you get from here to there.

.

I remember similar tirades from the left when W was president. Welcome to modern American politics.

 

[g5000]

Only an equivocating bitch would rant about 'division pimps' on this issue and not mention the assault on our Constitutional rights by the hard left.

I don't think you even know what equivocating means.

And your response is a tu quoque fallacy.

Two wrongs don't make you the kind of Right we want.

Let the Left take out their own trash, and we will take out you.

 

[g5000]

.

Radio hosts Michael Medved and Mike Rosen (KOA/Denver) are both conservative talk show hosts who avoid the whacked-out hyperbole practiced by the Limbaughs, Levins, Savages, Becks and Hannitys (the division pimps) of the world. So while they're committed partisans, they at least make the effort to be thoughtful, mature and reasonable.

In the last couple of days, however, they both had to deal with hardcore conservative callers who have been driven so over the top by their ideology (and, most likely, the aforementioned division pimps) that the talk show hosts were clearly embarrassed and had to disavow the callers.

In both cases, the talk show hosts were discussing gun control. And in both cases, the callers went into angry tirades about Obama. To paraphrase, both said something like "we all know that Marxist communist is gonna try to take our guns, and when he does, we're gonna defend ourselves against all those socialists who think they can destroy Amurrrrica." Something like that.

In both cases, the host sighed and paused, trying to find a way to respond quickly and respectfully. They then politely disagreed with the caller and moved on. I can only imagine what was going through their head, but I suspect it was something like "how do we get rid of these people?"...

Thing is, these people aren't going away. We see them here on this board, and they really believe the stuff they say. It's not a game. And they're so blinded that they don't realize how this is looking, what damage it's causing their own side.

They have to be marginalized, but how? I don't see how you get from here to there.

.

Then they really aren't conservatives. That wacked-out hyperbole you speak of is simply the truth. You just happen to be so extreme in your left-wing nutjob beliefs that you cannot even make an anonymous post on and internet forum without attacking and belittling people who disagree with you.

And you call the GOP, Limbaugh and the rest out of touch?

I call the piss drinkers who continually fall for the trolling of their puppeteers UnConservatives.

Remember just a few days ago when they were screaming about Obama's making a gun grab with unconstitutional EOs?

That's the retarded shit we are talking about.

They are already working on forgetting their gullibility over the EOs, and erasing their blank little minds to guzzle the next bucket of piss from their masters.

Day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year we see them do this. Time and time and time and time and time again. They NEVER wake up. It is frightening how Orwellian their behavior is.

Completely thoughtless, stupid bots.

One day they are calling Obama a warmonger for sending troops to Mali, and the next day they are screaming at Obama for not sending them fast enough. They forget they were against it before they were for it.

I have never seen the piss drinkers here perform a single fact check of the retarded shit they paste on this forum.

With the EOs, they parroted a bunch of fucking bullshit, speaking authoritatively about the unconstitutionality of EOs when it was crystal clear not one of them had ever even read one. And with that effort, they disqualified themselves from having any credibility in the gun control debate. They prematurely shot their wads all over their own faces.

They believe an ipse dixit statement about something is the height of rhetorical brilliance in a debate.


For each one of these retards the right wing coddles, they probably turn off at least two thinking people. And until they figure that out, the gibbering idiots will continue to get away with destroying the conservative movement.

 

[buckeye45_73]

The crazy division pimps are from the ultra irresponsible right and libertarian wings.

oh please the division is from the commie/civil rights people who need something to do....so now unequal treatment has been replaced by attacking a nonliberal saying the n word.