The Great Ronnie God's Benghazi

[bravoactual]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

 

[Sallow]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Ronnie got a pass on a lot from Conservatives.

What? What Iran Contra?

 

[tinydancer]

Good grief. Another gee don't look at Obama or Clinton just focus on Ronnie.

Can you libs at least come up with some new freaking material? Like posting about Eisenhower's term. Come on. Get creative.

You're boring as all get out right now.

 

[blackhawk]

 

[whitehall]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

 

[srlip]

So lock up the Republicans involved, TOO. That does NOT get your precious Hilary off the hook.

 

[Freewill]

More flying monkey BS. How many times is this same mantra going to be posted?

Consider, there have been more then one attack on diplomatic facitities under Obama yet only one raises to the level of question.

Consider, that under Clinton we had Blackhawk down. No cry of investigation.

Consider under Obama the SEALS suffered their biggest loss of life when a helicopter was shot down. No call for investigation.

But Benghazi is different then all of the above and the unfortunate deaths under Reagan. No one is saying that it is Obama's responsibility for the detail of the on ground operations. No one is saying that Obama should have personally designed the protection for Steven's. What is being said is that he and Rice lied about the attack. When people lie they have something to hide.

In Benghazi people died and Obama lied, why? The truth would have worked just as well for him, if indeed we know the truth. So in my opinion Stevens was doing something Obama doesn't want us to know about, like running guns.

All that said, there is no comparison to any attack and Benghazi.

 

[Sallow]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

What mistake did they make?

And what part of this is "leveling" with the American People?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow]Telling Lies - YouTube[/ame]

That was one traitorous lying motherfucking asshole.

And you guys are naming the entire country after him.

 

[Sallow]

More flying monkey BS. How many times is this same mantra going to be posted?

Consider, there have been more then one attack on diplomatic facitities under Obama yet only one raises to the level of question.

Consider, that under Clinton we had Blackhawk down. No cry of investigation.

Consider under Obama the SEALS suffered their biggest loss of life when a helicopter was shot down. No call for investigation.

But Benghazi is different then all of the above and the unfortunate deaths under Reagan. No one is saying that it is Obama's responsibility for the detail of the on ground operations. No one is saying that Obama should have personally designed the protection for Steven's. What is being said is that he and Rice lied about the attack. When people lie they have something to hide.

In Benghazi people died and Obama lied, why? The truth would have worked just as well for him, if indeed we know the truth. So in my opinion Stevens was doing something Obama doesn't want us to know about, like running guns.

All that said, there is no comparison to any attack and Benghazi.

Consider..Clinton was impeached.

Consider..Reagan was not.

 

[Freewill]

More flying monkey BS. How many times is this same mantra going to be posted?

Consider, there have been more then one attack on diplomatic facitities under Obama yet only one raises to the level of question.

Consider, that under Clinton we had Blackhawk down. No cry of investigation.

Consider under Obama the SEALS suffered their biggest loss of life when a helicopter was shot down. No call for investigation.

But Benghazi is different then all of the above and the unfortunate deaths under Reagan. No one is saying that it is Obama's responsibility for the detail of the on ground operations. No one is saying that Obama should have personally designed the protection for Steven's. What is being said is that he and Rice lied about the attack. When people lie they have something to hide.

In Benghazi people died and Obama lied, why? The truth would have worked just as well for him, if indeed we know the truth. So in my opinion Stevens was doing something Obama doesn't want us to know about, like running guns.

All that said, there is no comparison to any attack and Benghazi.

Consider..Clinton was impeached.

Consider..Reagan was not.

Consider, Clinton lied under oath depriving a woman of her constitutional rights.

Reagan didn't.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Swallow deal with it

conservatives were pissed about 1983. They have a commision.

and NOT A SINGLE PERSON BLAMED A VIDEO. They said some comanders didnt let tnem have ammo and didnt allow them to make stronger barriers than barbed wire......both of which were stupid.


on the other hand witn ben ghazi, we have the administration saying muslim nutjobs hate us becaue of a video on youtube, noone knew anything about. And ever procedure was followed......horseshit...if you believe any of those you are a fucking tard.


so how are the two remotely similar?

 

[Freewill]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

What mistake did they make?

And what part of this is "leveling" with the American People?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow]Telling Lies - YouTube[/ame]

That was one traitorous lying motherfucking asshole.

And you guys are naming the entire country after him.

So when do you think Obama will do as Reagan and admit to being wrong?

If Obama was half the man Reagan was he might actually be a good president.

 

[Sallow]

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

What mistake did they make?

And what part of this is "leveling" with the American People?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow]Telling Lies - YouTube[/ame]

That was one traitorous lying motherfucking asshole.

And you guys are naming the entire country after him.

So when do you think Obama will do as Reagan and admit to being wrong?

If Obama was half the man Reagan was he might actually be a good president.

Reagan didn't admit being wrong.

He said he didn't know anything about it.

Do you listen to these things or do you hear just what you want to hear.

Reagan never ever admitted fault.

 

[whitehall]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

What mistake did they make?

And what part of this is "leveling" with the American People?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow]Telling Lies - YouTube[/ame]

That was one traitorous lying motherfucking asshole.

And you guys are naming the entire country after him.

What mistake did "they" (Hillary and Hussein) make? You can't figure it out? First of all secretary of state Hillary underestimated the danger that the Benghazi embassy was in and the magic date 9/11 that might trigger an attack. It was her job to make sure embassies were defended. What really happens when you get iconic "2 am call"? Apparently Barry was paralyzed with indecision and the greatest Military in the world never got off the ground to help the Navy Seals and keep the Ambassador safe during a battle that lasted several hours. The worst part of course is the cover-up. Barry might have gotten away with it if he didn't order his staff to circulate a lie about an obscure you tube video that nobody ever saw. The cover-up used to be worse than the crime but when the media circles the wagons things are different.

 

[Nyvin]

What mistake did "they" (Hillary and Hussein) make? You can't figure it out? First of all secretary of state Hillary underestimated the danger that the Benghazi embassy was in and the magic date 9/11 that might trigger an attack. It was her job to make sure embassies were defended. What really happens when you get iconic "2 am call"? Apparently Barry was paralyzed with indecision and the greatest Military in the world never got off the ground to help the Navy Seals and keep the Ambassador safe during a battle that lasted several hours. The worst part of course is the cover-up. Barry might have gotten away with it if he didn't order his staff to circulate a lie about an obscure you tube video that nobody ever saw. The cover-up used to be worse than the crime but when the media circles the wagons things are different.

And yet...seven investigations and a year and a half later....no one found guilty of anything and not any charges against anyone. Surprise surprise.

 

[bodecea]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

What cover up? Are you saying that the Administration covered up Benghazi so we didn't know about it? Are you saying that the Administration covered up that THEY killed those 4 men?

 

[The Rabbi]

Did Reagan blame an internet video for the Beirut bombing?
No.
/thrread fail. Again.

What is the left going to come up with next? Herbert Hoover's Benghazi?

 

[The T]

Did Reagan blame an internet video for the Beirut bombing?
No.
/thrread fail. Again.

What is the left going to come up with next? Herbert Hoover's Benghazi?

Abe Lincoln...Shit? Why not dial it all the way back to Washington since they're on this revisionist kick?

 

[bravoactual]

No accusations that the great jelly bean eater failed to protect the Marines.

No accusations of a cover-up.

No demands for hearing on bonzo's playmate allowed the attacks to happen.

No accusations the nap taker watched the whole thing in real time.

 

[healthmyths]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

See the BIG difference between logical, rational people like me is that we are smart enough to recognize the truth and you are right!
Reagan should have done something. NO question! BUT the much MUCH bigger question is this how smart are you to know the MAJOR differences
between 1983 and 2012.
A) Ever hear of the "cold war"??? NO? NOTHING like the cold war existed in 2012.
B) Reagan WAS NOT RUNNING for re-election and definitely didn't have to HIDE something from the electorate as Obama did blaming a video.
C) Reagan was wrong in not using force BUT of course idiots would at that time "see the guy is a war monger!" and you would have been the first!

Finally the issue you are throwing up is a NON-ISSUE!
Those of us intelligent people are criticizing the FACTS that for political expediency a video was blamed! Remember here is exactly what the
Ben Rhodes Memo said:

* To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy;

that is the BIG deal here! the gross dishonesty displayed by the current deputy national security adviser for strategic communication for U.S. President Barack Obama Ben Rhodes IS NOT a political person but "SECURITY ADVISER"... so why was this MEMO to give goals on how to downplay the terrorism acts?

This is such a dereliction of his job.. i.e. NOT to make the administration have a "favorable" view to the electorate.. but for ALL Americans to be informed
not about political considerations BUT "national security" and this was NOT the case but a political cover up job!!!