LOki
The Yaweh of Mischief
- Mar 26, 2006
- 4,084
- 359
- 85
I saw only rhetorical questions premised upon disingenuous misrepresentations; other than those (some which I clearly addressed), which precise questions do you refer to? I can admit I might have missed them; so provide me with a sample.were you expecting honest discussion from someone with an education actually in the field being discussed? this is religious misinformation we're talking about.
Who cares his degree is in one field how do you know his experience in the field he is speaking about.
Anyone can read and learn from what they read.
Do you have this same view when let's say, your hero dawkins, speaks on subjects he is not educated in ?
Considering the heavy preponderance of verifiable evidence and valid logic that roundly contradicts the intellectually dishonest assertions that Veith makes regarding "what science teaches us" and his fatuous conclusions that have no valid basis in reality; what exactly do you find in these presentations to be so powerfully and awesomely valid?Powerful and awesome period. So that would be the validity.
I didn't notice your answers to any of the questions that Professor Veith raised.
What is your response to them sir?
Thanks.