- Sep 9, 2022
- 10,883
- 4,990
- 938
How many of the posters ever heard of Larken Rose? I have a short story. When Clinton was president, the normal useful forum was on AOL. There I happened to run across a dude using the fake name. Jackie Sneeb. His real name is Bill Malloy. Bill was an officer in the Army and flew fighter helicopters. As it happens, he is very brilliant. Along the way Larken Rose shows up, probably due to Bill Malloy posting, and we got into some excellent debates. In fact in Malloys book, he credits me as one of the debaters. Bill authored a book called There is no Government like no government. There he rakes government over the truth coals and His book is excellent and one all of the posters owes themselves the reading of his book.
What he teaches is amazing. Things you accept at face value and you ponder you will learn how this fact is true. Bill rejects the idea that this is a government of and by the people. As an illustration, can anybody explain clearly why if you can't perform an act, Government can? This is a paradox. Supposedly if we were of the Government we could also execute convicts. We could in fact have citizen trials and not have to wait on Government trials. We would be in charge of setting charges called Taxes up if we were in charge. We in short act as if we can appoint for us humans that perform acts we can't ourselves do. In fact most citizens know of cases where the citizens took action and not with Government approval nor involvement.
But when Larken Rose showed up, the heavy hitting was more intense. Larken is a very sensible man. And I know the Democrats will scream he is a tax cheat. But is he really? Can Government simply make claims? Who here has made laws? Who here rules neighbors? Who here runs courts? Who believes the Government is of the people and BY the people? Kind of stupid, right?
Larkin also produces videos. Watch this explanation and let's discuss what he says.
I endorse him and will say this as well. If we can't learn from the wise, we are doomed to learn from the stupid. Rose is brilliant.
What he teaches is amazing. Things you accept at face value and you ponder you will learn how this fact is true. Bill rejects the idea that this is a government of and by the people. As an illustration, can anybody explain clearly why if you can't perform an act, Government can? This is a paradox. Supposedly if we were of the Government we could also execute convicts. We could in fact have citizen trials and not have to wait on Government trials. We would be in charge of setting charges called Taxes up if we were in charge. We in short act as if we can appoint for us humans that perform acts we can't ourselves do. In fact most citizens know of cases where the citizens took action and not with Government approval nor involvement.
But when Larken Rose showed up, the heavy hitting was more intense. Larken is a very sensible man. And I know the Democrats will scream he is a tax cheat. But is he really? Can Government simply make claims? Who here has made laws? Who here rules neighbors? Who here runs courts? Who believes the Government is of the people and BY the people? Kind of stupid, right?
Larkin also produces videos. Watch this explanation and let's discuss what he says.
I endorse him and will say this as well. If we can't learn from the wise, we are doomed to learn from the stupid. Rose is brilliant.
Last edited: