8537
VIP Member
They can only fudge the numbers so much
So they "fudge" a 1.4% discrepancy in growth - and use the lower number?
My gawd people.
Ever thought the higher number might be the low number and have a much higher number?
Speaking of high...Are you high? Because that post makes no sense. Why would they make the published number 1.4 points lower than the equivalent number which no one pays any attention to?