- Sep 22, 2013
- 4,956
- 250
- 85
In the urban basketball-drama film Above the Rim, an emotionally scarred (and retired) but gifted African-American basketball player named Thomas has to find ways to be a positive influence on a younger high school basketball star named Kyle who may be falling into the criminal element of the socially stagnant gang-crime infested American inner-city. At the end of the film, there is a watershed street-community basketball tournament in which Thomas plays on Kyle's team to help him depose of a flock of talented if not more aspiring teams.
As we watch Kyle soar to great heights in the tournament, we notice the skill and threats posed by other teams with great talents, deadly bullies, and intriguing team choreography, and we're compelled to evaluate the metaphysics of the competitive but peaceful sports arena as representative of progressive politics consciousness. "How can sports/teamwork complement our democratic aspirations for a more cohesive America?"
Imagine that the modern world of terrorism-complicated geo-political networking (e.g., European Union, United Nations, etc.) compels two Americans (one a culture icon and role model or 'celebrity,' and the other an Internet-blogging idealist and democracy advocate and graduate of a prestigious Ivy League school) to speak in public forums (press interviews, global Internet discussion boards, etc.) about the objective reality of networking obstacles.
Let's imagine this celebrity is Tom Cruise and our hypothetical Ivy League idealistic Internet-blogger is an Albanian-American named Dr. Ajay Satan (currently an assistant professor of psychology at Yale University).
This Cruise-Satan 'duet' would certainly remind us of the pro-populism politics 'spirit' that hoisted the pro-pedestrianism Cuban revolutionaries Fidel Castro and Che Guevara to the level of 'socialism diplomats' (or demi-gods!).
What 'wiggle-room' under this current media-hoarding if incendiary (i.e., criticisms about unabashed nepotism-politics and untempered chauvinism) Trump Administration do we see for entertaining ideas/stories that such a hypothetical Cruise-Satan duet would signify our practical modern civilization focus on 'people-based passions'?
If we feel comfortable and 'safe' entertaining relevant 'federalism-critique storytelling,' then we should feel better about the marketing of free-speech pride films such as All the President's Men, Milk, and Oleanna.
So here's a story about this Cruise-Satan duet I wrote regarding a video game censorship controversy (regarding a pro-war G.I. Joe film adapted video game). I want to feel like the election of a finance-wizard (and consumerism-savvy) U.S. President (Donald Trump), the first celebrity-prez since Ronald Reagan, caters to a new age social demand for 'pro-commerce storytelling.'
====
Tom Cruise and Dr. Ajay Satan were considered 'society sociologists' in their respective 'realms.' Cruise was a respected American movie star and 'celebrity,' and Satan was a respected Ivy League assistant professor of psychology and pro-democracy Internet-blogger on the popular forum World Discussion Board. Cruise started talking in press interviews about the value of pluralism and tolerance to his personal interests in using the media 'market' to advertise the burgeoning of his religious group the Church of Scientology. Satan was discussing the special opportunity 'consumerism-based politics' (e.g., European Union, NATO, Wall Street, etc.) creates for more progressive traffic-based governance dialogue (i.e., illegal immigration).
As Cruise and Satan secured themselves as the premier diplomats of new age 'populism rhetoric,' writers and philosophers and designers started making comic books, avatars, history theses, and even movies about the special leadership vacuums created by traffic-heavy democracy-exam opportunism discourse (e.g., The Wolf of Wall Street). One night, Cruise and Satan both shared a similar dream while sleeping. They both coincidentally dreamt that they were visited by a fictional American comic book superhero (Cruise by DC Comics' Green Lantern --- a hero carrying a magical ring and lantern --- and Satan by DC Comics' Green Arrow --- a hero carrying magical arrows) who told them of the necessity of using popularity/influence to advertise American values!
Cruise and Satan started talking about video game content (e.g., war-biased 'G.I. Joe' games) after being inspired by their respective dream-sleep experiences. When their chatter caught wind, critics suggested that the hyping of pro-war themed 'G.I. Joe' video games would only provide unwanted fire to the already turbulent dialogue regarding the ethical content in thrill-fest media for youngsters (e.g., video games). One critic, a member of the CNN news team, suggested that considering censoring such pro-war video games could prove to be 'wise.' When Cruise heard about these censorship rumors, he felt compelled to offer the following statement in the press: "If we can't entertain the notion that our video games for kids offer images/ideas regarding challenges to American values, then we are not in touch with pedestrian passions even under this hypothetically pro-commerce Trump Administration 'dominion'!"
====
Fahrenheit 451 (Film)
As we watch Kyle soar to great heights in the tournament, we notice the skill and threats posed by other teams with great talents, deadly bullies, and intriguing team choreography, and we're compelled to evaluate the metaphysics of the competitive but peaceful sports arena as representative of progressive politics consciousness. "How can sports/teamwork complement our democratic aspirations for a more cohesive America?"
Imagine that the modern world of terrorism-complicated geo-political networking (e.g., European Union, United Nations, etc.) compels two Americans (one a culture icon and role model or 'celebrity,' and the other an Internet-blogging idealist and democracy advocate and graduate of a prestigious Ivy League school) to speak in public forums (press interviews, global Internet discussion boards, etc.) about the objective reality of networking obstacles.
Let's imagine this celebrity is Tom Cruise and our hypothetical Ivy League idealistic Internet-blogger is an Albanian-American named Dr. Ajay Satan (currently an assistant professor of psychology at Yale University).
This Cruise-Satan 'duet' would certainly remind us of the pro-populism politics 'spirit' that hoisted the pro-pedestrianism Cuban revolutionaries Fidel Castro and Che Guevara to the level of 'socialism diplomats' (or demi-gods!).
What 'wiggle-room' under this current media-hoarding if incendiary (i.e., criticisms about unabashed nepotism-politics and untempered chauvinism) Trump Administration do we see for entertaining ideas/stories that such a hypothetical Cruise-Satan duet would signify our practical modern civilization focus on 'people-based passions'?
If we feel comfortable and 'safe' entertaining relevant 'federalism-critique storytelling,' then we should feel better about the marketing of free-speech pride films such as All the President's Men, Milk, and Oleanna.
So here's a story about this Cruise-Satan duet I wrote regarding a video game censorship controversy (regarding a pro-war G.I. Joe film adapted video game). I want to feel like the election of a finance-wizard (and consumerism-savvy) U.S. President (Donald Trump), the first celebrity-prez since Ronald Reagan, caters to a new age social demand for 'pro-commerce storytelling.'
====
Tom Cruise and Dr. Ajay Satan were considered 'society sociologists' in their respective 'realms.' Cruise was a respected American movie star and 'celebrity,' and Satan was a respected Ivy League assistant professor of psychology and pro-democracy Internet-blogger on the popular forum World Discussion Board. Cruise started talking in press interviews about the value of pluralism and tolerance to his personal interests in using the media 'market' to advertise the burgeoning of his religious group the Church of Scientology. Satan was discussing the special opportunity 'consumerism-based politics' (e.g., European Union, NATO, Wall Street, etc.) creates for more progressive traffic-based governance dialogue (i.e., illegal immigration).
As Cruise and Satan secured themselves as the premier diplomats of new age 'populism rhetoric,' writers and philosophers and designers started making comic books, avatars, history theses, and even movies about the special leadership vacuums created by traffic-heavy democracy-exam opportunism discourse (e.g., The Wolf of Wall Street). One night, Cruise and Satan both shared a similar dream while sleeping. They both coincidentally dreamt that they were visited by a fictional American comic book superhero (Cruise by DC Comics' Green Lantern --- a hero carrying a magical ring and lantern --- and Satan by DC Comics' Green Arrow --- a hero carrying magical arrows) who told them of the necessity of using popularity/influence to advertise American values!
Cruise and Satan started talking about video game content (e.g., war-biased 'G.I. Joe' games) after being inspired by their respective dream-sleep experiences. When their chatter caught wind, critics suggested that the hyping of pro-war themed 'G.I. Joe' video games would only provide unwanted fire to the already turbulent dialogue regarding the ethical content in thrill-fest media for youngsters (e.g., video games). One critic, a member of the CNN news team, suggested that considering censoring such pro-war video games could prove to be 'wise.' When Cruise heard about these censorship rumors, he felt compelled to offer the following statement in the press: "If we can't entertain the notion that our video games for kids offer images/ideas regarding challenges to American values, then we are not in touch with pedestrian passions even under this hypothetically pro-commerce Trump Administration 'dominion'!"
====
Fahrenheit 451 (Film)