naturegirl
Gold Member
So I'm waiting for rdean's explanation of what a liberal is..........I thought he was gonna tell us based on the title of this thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We learned a couple of things about liberalism from the board. We learned that liberals are often afraid to use the L word. They prefer progressive or some other nonsense. We learned that liberal posts are often bigoted and hateful especially toward Christian based religions they do not agree with. We learned that liberals can't defend Obama or liberalism. Instead they throw out a hundred ridiculous charges hoping that something will stick.
The GOP rightfully prides itself that the first Republican President fought to take an oppressed people and give to them their human rights. Abolition was the central plank of the newly formed Republican party.
The GOP also rightfully prides itself that one hundred years later, the Republican Party voted to give those same people their civil rights. It was a Republican majority that passed the Civil Rights Act, not a Democratic one.
But when we fast forward another 50 years, we find a radically different Republican party that vehemently opposes extending civil rights to another group of oppressed people. You can imagine my confusion for being called a liberal for supporting human and civil rights for homosexuals.
The hatred and bigotry which has infected the party is more than a little disturbing.
I have not abandoned the Republican party, it has abandoned me.
Liberalism of today is not what it used to intend. Which is why the liberals of today are not liberals at all. They are progressives. They have attached themselves to Marxist philosophy and are against liberty. They use talking points to deceive liberal minded voters that they are for equality, when in fact, they are totalitarian statists.
I just call them LOLberals.
Strange the way Republicans and conservatives on this board are always saying what "liberalism" is. Where do they get such nonsense?
Is it because they have no liberals in their party? So what they imagine comes out of the Twilight Zone?
And worse, after all the failures of the last 10 years, how did they get so confident about their own ideology?
Strange the way Republicans and conservatives on this board are always saying what "liberalism" is. Where do they get such nonsense?
Is it because they have no liberals in their party? So what they imagine comes out of the Twilight Zone?
And worse, after all the failures of the last 10 years, how did they get so confident about their own ideology?
Liberalism of today is not what it used to intend. Which is why the liberals of today are not liberals at all. They are progressives. They have attached themselves to Marxist philosophy and are against liberty. They use talking points to deceive liberal minded voters that they are for equality, when in fact, they are totalitarian statists.
I just call them LOLberals.
This is your brain on fox news ladies and gentlemen.
And conservatives today are not what they use to be.Liberalism of today is not what it used to intend. Which is why the liberals of today are not liberals at all. They are progressives. They have attached themselves to Marxist philosophy and are against liberty. They use talking points to deceive liberal minded voters that they are for equality, when in fact, they are totalitarian statists.
I just call them LOLberals.
Liberalism of today is not what it used to intend. Which is why the liberals of today are not liberals at all. They are progressives. They have attached themselves to Marxist philosophy and are against liberty. They use talking points to deceive liberal minded voters that they are for equality, when in fact, they are totalitarian statists.
I just call them LOLberals.
This is your brain on fox news ladies and gentlemen.
And conservatives today are not what they use to be.Liberalism of today is not what it used to intend. Which is why the liberals of today are not liberals at all. They are progressives. They have attached themselves to Marxist philosophy and are against liberty. They use talking points to deceive liberal minded voters that they are for equality, when in fact, they are totalitarian statists.
I just call them LOLberals.
Strange the way Republicans and conservatives on this board are always saying what "liberalism" is. Where do they get such nonsense?
Is it because they have no liberals in their party? So what they imagine comes out of the Twilight Zone?
And worse, after all the failures of the last 10 years, how did they get so confident about their own ideology?
Strange the way Republicans and conservatives on this board are always saying what "liberalism" is. Where do they get such nonsense?
Is it because they have no liberals in their party? So what they imagine comes out of the Twilight Zone?
And worse, after all the failures of the last 10 years, how did they get so confident about their own ideology?
Its been a good 24 yrs or so since we had a real conservative in the WH...
FAIL.
Bitch all you want about not having a "real conservative". Fact is, you guys campaign excitedly about many of your presidents, including George Bush, and always declare them to not be a "true conservative". And the guy you DO call a real conservative wasn't who you fucking thought he was!
The brainwashing from fox and other right wing propaganda outlet tells them.
Strange the way Republicans and conservatives on this board are always saying what "liberalism" is. Where do they get such nonsense?
Is it because they have no liberals in their party? So what they imagine comes out of the Twilight Zone?
And worse, after all the failures of the last 10 years, how did they get so confident about their own ideology?
Its because they don't actually read or listen to anything liberals say. They don't need to. They have Bill O'Reilly to tell them what liberals say. Coincidentally, he also tells them what to think and who to hate.
Well, that doesn't seem accurate, Grunt. Otherwise it would not be Romney on the GOP ticket to attack Romney....er, I mean Obama.
Well, that doesn't seem accurate, Grunt. Otherwise it would not be Romney on the GOP ticket to attack Romney....er, I mean Obama.
He wasn't my candidate of choice, believe that. But there is just not ay in hell he can be any worse than the one currently in office.