Manonthestreet
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2014
- 35,735
- 24,284
- 1,945
You better worrry cause its getting pushed more and more.....You must want the planet to die under ocean rising because of CO2....deniers like you should go to prisonYou are equating antiques to todays tech......On the contrary,,,, its cost.....massive cost.......new nukes are ton safer and generate lot less waste which can be recycled.
Nukes safer? You are truly delusional. Look at Japan and Russia. And the legacy of Chernobyl isn't through yet. There is a large area around it that is covered in forest. It is so radioactive that the microbes needed to break down the plant matter are dead. So the plant matter just keeps building up. And when that stuff catches on fire, whit is bound to someday, it is going to release another highly toxic wave of radiation around Russia and Europe.
Also, "new nuclear" is probably as much pie in the sky as hydrogen. And recycling nuclear waste right now is a joke. No doubt it will remain that way for any "new" nuclear plant designs.
When technology comes along that can make radioactive things unradioactive, let me know.
If I was one of those moronic deniers, I wouldn't even be worrying about it. Look at my other thread around here called, "perpetual motion has been around for a long time. Suckers!" Wit what I speak of there, radiation doesn't even come into the equation.