The Civilizer

[Ringo]

"I think we shall have to take the Chinese in hand and regulate them. I believe that as civilized nations become more powerful they will get more ruthless, and the time will come when the world will impatiently bear the existence of great barbaric nations who may at any time arm themselves and menace civilized nations. I believe in the ultimate partition of China—I mean ultimate. I hope we shall not have to do it in our day. The Aryan stock is bound to triumph."

And who is the author of this most interesting text. Well, it's Sir Churchill, the favorite idol of all capitalist scum. And, at the same time, the ideological father of Adolf the madman and the ideas of nazism.
Hitler dreamed of ruling the world with the Anglo-Saxons, the other Aryans.

WSC: A Midnight Interview, 1902

Finest Hour 159, Summer 2013 Page 33 By Gustavus A. Ohlinger in 1966 Mr. Ohlinger (1877-1972) was a distinguished attorney, author and lecturer. Born in China of American missionaries, he […]

winstonchurchill.org

Can you imagine if Stalin had said something like that? In some museum of anti-communism they would have written that in capital letters on the wall, with a huge pile of bones and skulls at the bottom. But here - honor and respect to the cannibal of the 20th century from admiring businessmen.
It was a good old time, when civilizers were still not shy about equating the synonyms (for them) of "civilized" and "Aryan".

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Churchill believed in the destiny of the English-speaking nations just as fools believe in the destiny of Russian-speaking nations.

All is dust.

 

[elektra]

what is wrong with what churchill said? it is possible that one day we may have to fight china because they get to aggressive. That is just common sense.

 

[gipper]

It’s unfortunate that a drunken bloodthirsty imperialist fool is revered. It does say something about our current failed state.

 

[gipper]

what is wrong with what churchill said? it is possible that one day we may have to fight china because they get to aggressive. That is just common sense.

Here is an excellent column on the “drunken bum.”

Churchill certainly seems to fall into this category, with rumors of massive personal corruption swirling around him from early in his political career. Later, he supplemented his income by engaging in widespread art-forgery, a fact that Roosevelt eventually discovered and probably used as a point of personal leverage against him. Also quite serious was Churchill’s constant state of drunkenness, with his inebriation being so widespread as to constitute clinical alcoholism. Indeed, Irving notes that in his private conversations FDR routinely referred to Churchill as “a drunken bum.”



Hitler, Churchill, the Holocaust, and the War in Ukraine

 

[elektra]

Churchill, was a bit of a hero in the Boer war. Escaping from the Boer after being taken prisoner.

The Boer War

More action was to beckon. A serious colonial war had begun in South Africa and Churchill managed to secure another lucrative assignment to report on the war for the Morning Post. In this last youthful military adventure, Churchill set off and arrived in Cape Town late on 30 October 1899. He was...

winstonchurchill.org

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Churchill will be the major figure, with all of his flaws, remembered first in the history books 500 years from now.

 

[elektra]

Churchill, a very smart man

Vice of Capitalism

‘The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.’ Winston Churchill, House of Commons, 22 October 1945

winstonchurchill.org

The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.’
Winston Churchill, House of Commons, 22 October 1945

 

[Ringo]

Churchill, was a bit of a hero in the Boer war. Escaping from the Boer after being taken prisoner.

And Hitler got Iron Cross, Goering got two Iron crosses and Pour Le Merite in WWI.
Does it make them less cannibals?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

And Hitler got Iron Cross, Goering got two Iron crosses and Pour Le Merite in WWI.
Does it make them less cannibals?

I know a Distinguished Service Cross I would not let in my home. So what?

Churchill, no matter all the flaws, is the major historic figure of the 20th century.

 

[gipper]

Is it any wonder we’re ruled by criminals, when many people revere a corrupt crook like the old bulldog.

 

[Ralph Norton]

And Hitler got Iron Cross, Goering got two Iron crosses and Pour Le Merite in WWI.
Does it make them less cannibals?

Cannibals?

 

[Ringo]

Cannibals?

Oh, I'm sorry! I forgot, that Hitler was a vegetarian.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Churchill, a very smart man

Vice of Capitalism

‘The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.’ Winston Churchill, House of Commons, 22 October 1945

winstonchurchill.org

Two Wings of the Same Vulture

They are not opposites. They both originated in the built-in decadence of hereditary parasites. So did anti-imperialism.

 

[elektra]

And Hitler got Iron Cross, Goering got two Iron crosses and Pour Le Merite in WWI.
Does it make them less cannibals?

Hitler and Goering vs. Churchill, that would make a Churchill a saint. And to the many lives Churchill saved, a saint Churchill is.

Hitler and Goering? You dont much bingo

 

[Ringo]

And to the many lives Churchill saved, a saint Churchill is.

The Rest of Us Always Knew Churchill Was a Villain

His record in Britain’s former colonies more closely resembles that of a war criminal than a defender of democracy and freedom.

www.bloomberg.com

Churchill and Eugenics

By Sir Martin Gilbert CBE Abstract: When he was Home Secretary (February 1910-October 1911) Churchill was in favor of the confinement, segregation, and sterilization of a class of persons contemporarily […]

winstonchurchill.org

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Churchill, heroic figure and villian, will be the most notable individual in history 500 years from now for the 20th century.

 

[elektra]

The Rest of Us Always Knew Churchill Was a Villain

His record in Britain’s former colonies more closely resembles that of a war criminal than a defender of democracy and freedom.

www.bloomberg.com

Churchill and Eugenics

By Sir Martin Gilbert CBE Abstract: When he was Home Secretary (February 1910-October 1911) Churchill was in favor of the confinement, segregation, and sterilization of a class of persons contemporarily […]

winstonchurchill.org

????

Now describe what feeble minded meant in 1910 England

to judge the past with the mindset of today's education and culture is the same as being ignorant of the past

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

To judge the past by today's standards is presentism.

"Presentism is a pejorative term for the introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past. It is a form of cultural bias that creates a distorted understanding of the subject matter 1. Presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past. It is also a factor in the problematic question of history and moral judgments 1." AI Bing

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

To judge the past by today's standards is presentism.

"Presentism is a pejorative term for the introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past. It is a form of cultural bias that creates a distorted understanding of the subject matter 1. Presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past. It is also a factor in the problematic question of history and moral judgments 1." AI Bing

We're Lucky the Past Couldn't See Its Future As Us

"Presentism" implies that they weren't "enlightened" like we are, with our degenerate ruling class pushing us back to the Dark Ages unopposed.