Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No dumbass the 10 hottest years on record all occurred after 2000. THere is no cooling just dumbasses like you who can't add 2+2
starz- for the last decade there has been no change in temp (roughly). heat gain has been matched by heat loss. individual years are not independent of the previous year. they do not start at the average temp of the last 30 years (or 300 or 3000 or 3million). the last decade has only been 'the warmest' because they initially started warm and didnt change.
we should be much more interested in the ENSO change of 1998 that reset the thermostat at the present level. years with little or no change are just not that interesting. it is the years withlarge differences in rate of change that will give us more information about climate and what controls it.
Ian, this is a damned lie, and you know it.
UAH Global Temperature Update for March 2012: +0.11 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.
Only by using a record El Nino year as your starting point, 1998, can you make that claim. We equaled 1998 in 2005 and 2010 without a record El Nino. And, when the next strong El Nino occurs, will far surpass 1998.
Shall we look at one way the Faithers want to "save" us? Compact flourescents.
Talk about a problem for the kiddos. Mercury.
Knee jerk, feelings based answers are bad Faithers.
LEDs have arrived, dumbass.
No dumbass the 10 hottest years on record all occurred after 2000. THere is no cooling just dumbasses like you who can't add 2+2
starz- for the last decade there has been no change in temp (roughly). heat gain has been matched by heat loss. individual years are not independent of the previous year. they do not start at the average temp of the last 30 years (or 300 or 3000 or 3million). the last decade has only been 'the warmest' because they initially started warm and didnt change.
we should be much more interested in the ENSO change of 1998 that reset the thermostat at the present level. years with little or no change are just not that interesting. it is the years withlarge differences in rate of change that will give us more information about climate and what controls it.
Ian, this is a damned lie, and you know it.
UAH Global Temperature Update for March 2012: +0.11 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.
Only by using a record El Nino year as your starting point, 1998, can you make that claim. We equaled 1998 in 2005 and 2010 without a record El Nino. And, when the next strong El Nino occurs, will far surpass 1998.
Ian, this is a damned lie, and you know it.
UAH Global Temperature Update for March 2012: +0.11 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.
Wire, you remain a silly ass. In spite of a double La Nina, the March temperature is above most of the temperatures for all the years prior to 1998.
starz- for the last decade there has been no change in temp (roughly). heat gain has been matched by heat loss. individual years are not independent of the previous year. they do not start at the average temp of the last 30 years (or 300 or 3000 or 3million). the last decade has only been 'the warmest' because they initially started warm and didnt change.
we should be much more interested in the ENSO change of 1998 that reset the thermostat at the present level. years with little or no change are just not that interesting. it is the years withlarge differences in rate of change that will give us more information about climate and what controls it.
Ian, this is a damned lie, and you know it.
UAH Global Temperature Update for March 2012: +0.11 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.
Only by using a record El Nino year as your starting point, 1998, can you make that claim. We equaled 1998 in 2005 and 2010 without a record El Nino. And, when the next strong El Nino occurs, will far surpass 1998.
do you ever even read my posts? or do you just skim them and then insert whatever comment John Cook would deem appropriate?
the first part of the graph from 1979-1997 shows temps around -0.1C anomaly with fluctuations up and down. then comes an amazing spike of one whole degree celcius in less than one year. after that spike the temps settled in at about +0.15C anomaly with fluctuations up and down between 2000-2012.
got that? flat temps for 18 years, huge spike and rebound, then flat temps again for 12years (albeit at a higher level). the rate of change and the amount of change were much larger around the time of the 1998 El Nino. to me, that is the place to look for information about what controls the climate.
for instance- Mt Pinatubo went off 4 years before the spike. recovery from large volcanoes has a natural feedback to it. a big change that leads to a big overshoot, then a medium change that leads to a medium overshoot in the opposite direction, a smaller change in the first direction that leads to a......repeat as long as necessary. (the climate models do not predict this, and modelled recovery is gradual and takes longer than in reality). did something go wrong with the volcano natural feedback system that led to a reset of the thermostat temperature? have large eruptions had similar effects in the past that have raised or lowered the temp for decades rather than just a few years? I dont know. but I do know that the 1998 ENSO event sticks out like a sore thumb in the temperature record and until we have a better understanding of what happened there I think we are just fooling ourselves by thinking that the puny effect of CO2 is running the climate.
They need to lead on this one because I'm not really trained to do this. I may not get it right if I don't see a few million examples first.
I see so according t you the decade of 2000 having 9 out of the hottest years ever recorded means the decade of 2000 didn't experience any warmingWire, you remain a silly ass. In spite of a double La Nina, the March temperature is above most of the temperatures for all the years prior to 1998.
And still you can't grasp that there has been no warming for more than a decade. And were those temperatures for the years prior to 1998 the tampered with record, the mangled record, the raped record, or the deliberately adjusted record?
By the way, what did you say the margin of error was in that claim of +0.11 degrees? I didn't hear you.
I see so according t you the decade of 2000 having 9 out of the hottest years ever recorded means the decade of 2000 didn't experience any warmingWire, you remain a silly ass. In spite of a double La Nina, the March temperature is above most of the temperatures for all the years prior to 1998.
And still you can't grasp that there has been no warming for more than a decade. And were those temperatures for the years prior to 1998 the tampered with record, the mangled record, the raped record, or the deliberately adjusted record?
By the way, what did you say the margin of error was in that claim of +0.11 degrees? I didn't hear you.
I see so according t you the decade of 2000 having 9 out of the hottest years ever recorded means the decade of 2000 didn't experience any warmingWire, you remain a silly ass. In spite of a double La Nina, the March temperature is above most of the temperatures for all the years prior to 1998.
And still you can't grasp that there has been no warming for more than a decade. And were those temperatures for the years prior to 1998 the tampered with record, the mangled record, the raped record, or the deliberately adjusted record?
By the way, what did you say the margin of error was in that claim of +0.11 degrees? I didn't hear you.
I see so according t you the decade of 2000 having 9 out of the hottest years ever recorded means the decade of 2000 didn't experience any warmingWire, you remain a silly ass. In spite of a double La Nina, the March temperature is above most of the temperatures for all the years prior to 1998.
And still you can't grasp that there has been no warming for more than a decade. And were those temperatures for the years prior to 1998 the tampered with record, the mangled record, the raped record, or the deliberately adjusted record?
By the way, what did you say the margin of error was in that claim of +0.11 degrees? I didn't hear you.
