Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #41
What does ROFLMNAO stand for?
roll on the floor laughing my ass off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does ROFLMNAO stand for?
What does ROFLMNAO stand for?
Man Cultwhore commited vote fraud.
Irony... she can be SUCH a bitch.
I challenge this leftist to post specific examples of these failures to which she is speaking...
Now in the unlikely event that she posts such, what we'll find is that EACH one is rooted in leftism. A fact which she will deny, NOT upon any basis in FACT, but upon little more than a litanny of platitudes; each one rooted in the mindless indoctrination of the left. "It is simply so..."
$700 billion dollars borrowed from China to occupy Iraq.
Wow... so we borrowed $700 billion from the Chinese Governemnt to occupy Iraq?
Can you show us any evidence that the Chinese Government has written a check for $700 billion so the US government can occupy Iraq?
Now obviously you cannot, as such your entire position is a specious conclusion drawn from the idiocy hat is the leftist blogisphere...
Did China, through any number of institutions invest in US Treasury securities? Yes...
Did the US spend in deficit to fund the liberation of Iraq? Yes...
Did the Chinese Government loan the US $700 billion dollars so the US could occupy Iraq? NOOooooooo...
Or was it because of the socialist entitlements, the programs which have for decades mandated greater and greater levels of spending... could it have been the need for massive retooling of US military logistical needs, which were deficient due to massive cuts by the socialist left, so as to free up money they claimed was necessary for social programs to help 'da po'...
Hmm.... I wonder...
Thought I'd keep it simple so you could understand...Now I would like to state for the record that I do not know this leftist... and I've paid her nothing to come to this board and prove my point. She did so to the best of my knowledge of her own volition and the highest likelihood is that she is blissfully ignorant that her post represents her stark intellectual limitations, which were spoken to and stood as the central point in the post, to which she was responding and that it projects the illusion of genius on my part is just that an illusion. In truth Im not very bright I just look like a freakin Mensa when the contrast is against a leftists so please I had nothing to do with it.
Now again, should she return to deny her position, scream that it was misrepresented and otherwise runs to avoid accountability, I had no hand in the process other than to state my position and that she proves the position is simply Nature's way...
What a bunch of nut cases!
You people really need help.
puleeze....
wanna talk about brainwashing? talk about the geniuses who want four more years of the same failures they've had for the last eight.
Now THAT'S brainwashing.
My brain isn't washed.
I send it out to be dry cleaned.
While I agree with you, the lefties have brainwashed themselves and the uneducated otherwise.
Or was it because of the socialist entitlements, the programs which have for decades mandated greater and greater levels of spending... could it have been the need for massive retooling of US military logistical needs, which were deficient due to massive cuts by the socialist left, so as to free up money they claimed was necessary for social programs to help 'da po'...
The debt the US incurs does fund social entitlement programs... which are by and large favored by the US voter. That is why they remain untouched regardless of whether the administration is Republican or Democrat.
Some of the costs of US military intervention could be construed as being necessary due to a lack of investment by the previous administration. However, if the previous administration had made that investment, that would have cost money too. This still is government spending. Of course, no amount of reasonable up front spending would have accounted for the cost of the unnecessary war that we embroiled ourselves in.
No, it wasn't.
Social security had already been funded by the American who paid for it.
AS far as the rest of the welfare (which really does come out of the budget, and is not funded by people contributing to the fund, like social security has been our entire lives) that's a number so small and insignificant that you can't even FIND it on the budget. (all welfare programs are about 3% of the total revenues, BTW)
We haven't spend a trillion dollars on all the welfare programs in place in the last twenty years, dude.
Iraq is costing us a trillion dollars. That's why we had to increase the nation debt loads last year.
Wake up from your ideaological slumber and look at the real numbers.
On what principle does one man strip another man of the product of HIS labor, so that the stolen product can be used to satisfy the need of another?