The Blood on Obama’s Hands

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Nova78, Aug 27, 2012.

  1. Nova78
    Offline

    Nova78 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,909
    Thanks Received:
    254
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +267
    $111028042442-sgt-gibbs-afghan-sport-killings-story-top.jpg

    $flag-draped-coffin.jpg http://lettingfreedomring.com/2012/08/23/the-blood-on-obamas-hands/

    The media should be telling the story of the blood on the hands of Barack Obama. They are not. What is this shocking story the media is not telling us?

    The blood on Obama’s hands comes from the American troops in Afghanistan.

    Obama’s policy for American troops in Afghanistan can be summarized as, “Let them be targets.”

    Obama has American troops in Afghanistan dying or being maimed for no good purpose. He has no objectives here, other than not to lose Afghanistan before the election so it will not be blamed on him.

    In the last eleven days, there have been nine attacks on American or NATO soldiers by Afghan soldiers or Taliban infiltrators posing as Afghan soldiers. These are the so-called insider attacks.

    What has been the response of the Obama Regime to more Americans coming home in flag-draped coffins?

    They are pressuring Afghanistan to do more “screening” of recruits. Gee, Afghanistan is a 7th Century nation. How are they going to screen people? There are no central records in Afghanistan. How are they going to screen? Unless there is a new way to start reading minds, screening in Afghanistan means nothing.

    Makes you sick ,letting Americans die for what ? Other than not to lose Afghanistan before the election so it will not be blamed on him.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. 8537
    Offline

    8537 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,754
    Thanks Received:
    729
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    New England's West Coast
    Ratings:
    +729
    So you agree we should get out of there?
     
  3. P@triot
    Offline

    P@triot Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    23,192
    Thanks Received:
    2,731
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +8,531
    No - he "agrees" that our troops should not be made targets so that Obama can appease the muslim radical maniacs. He "agrees" we should stay there and kick ass. He "agrees" we should engage before our troops are killed, because - well, it is a war.

    How quickly you've forgotten 9/11 and the 3,000+ American's who died that day, uh? Typical liberal - politics over human life and fellow citizens.
     
  4. VaYank5150
    Offline

    VaYank5150 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    11,779
    Thanks Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,055
    Obama NEVER should have doubled down on Afghanistan by agreeing with McCain that a "surge" was needed after he got our troops out of Iraq. However, the actual combat missions on the ground are planned by our military leaders on the ground and NOT Obama himself, I hope....
     
  5. 8537
    Offline

    8537 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,754
    Thanks Received:
    729
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    New England's West Coast
    Ratings:
    +729
    This is the most off-topic and off-point response I have seen here in quite some time.

    So what would be YOUR recommendation for our troops in Afghanistan?
     
  6. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    136,748
    Thanks Received:
    12,300
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +32,247
    The American people will not by your pap.

    Republicans can beat Obama on the issues not your worthless propaganda.

     
  7. FA_Q2
    Offline

    FA_Q2 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    14,227
    Thanks Received:
    2,076
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Washington State
    Ratings:
    +4,277
    And? Did you have a problem with Bush for going there in the first place?

    Simply put, Afghanistan is a complicated warzone and nothing is going to change that. There is really only 2 directions to go here: get out and let what happens happen.

    This is an asinine concept. This is a war and we need to finish it.

    OR we can continue and fight to stand that heap up. In this case, unless you have a SPECIFIC operating procedure that you disagree with, the President is doing nothing wrong there.

    Cite a specific problem or you look like a hack.
     
  8. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    136,748
    Thanks Received:
    12,300
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +32,247
    I had a problem with Bush pulling spec op troops and helicopter units for the Iraqi invasion.

    That bit of Bushie baloney doomed our effort in Afghanistan and is forcing Obama to end the war next year.

    Our window for victory ended long, long ago.
     
  9. VaYank5150
    Offline

    VaYank5150 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    11,779
    Thanks Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,055
    There never was a window for victory. Never.
     
  10. JimBowie1958
    Offline

    JimBowie1958 Old Fogey

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    39,343
    Thanks Received:
    5,505
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Ratings:
    +21,473
    Starkey, when are you going to drop faking being a RINO?

    Jee-whilacors, drop thebullshit and just admit that your a troll and will vote Dem like yo always have, OK? It is more honest.

    Not that you give a fig about honesty.
     

Share This Page