- Thread starter
- #61
No mind reader, and you clearly didn't read what I had actually written either. You decided what I had written meant something that it didn't say. It happens too much for me not to get annoyed at it.
I am absolutely 100% positive that I read every single word.
Well it's not what light infantry would have. It was always the weapons that citizens carried around in their normal daily life.
I read militia as light infantry because that's what a militia is.
I didn't say there was a limitation on the number of arms. I said what the Amendment means, which is that the feds can't prevent individuals from having arms. If you have a handgun, have I prevented you from having arms? No, I have not. If I prevent you having two guns, am I preventing you from having arms? No, I'm not.
Actually, yes. Yes to are preventing me from having arms. Allowing one and preventing another still is preventing arms. The dead give way is the word preventing.
Last edited: