C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.The USSC has never addressed the issue, except in one case in the 1930s where the entire defense team never showed up for the trial. They rubber-stamped a number of lies by the govt prosecution, into an "opinion". And the Left has been desperate to never touch the issue ever since that "case".Not according to the USSC. I'm afraid your opinion doesn't measure up.That is called an "infringment".
Miller concerned nothing of the sort.
And acts of Congress are presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise (see US v. Morrison).
That the Supreme Court has never addressed the issue of the constitutionality of laws disallowing prohibited persons from possessing firearms does not mean such laws are an 'infringement' on the Second Amendment right.
Moreover, the Heller Court reaffirmed the validity of such laws when it admonished lower courts to not infer that their ruling undermined laws designating prohibited persons.