The 2016 Election Explained by Two Maps

[Wyatt earp]

Map is bullshit lol. Areas right outside of KC?

Get the fuck out with this nonsense. And FYI "local" news predominantly talk about local issues dummy. Cable news talk about politics 24/7 and you can get that shit everywhere ya moron.

Read the post again.
You missed the main point: no newspapers in these areas.
And without access to local news, the city and county politicians are free to go absolutely unaccountable.

.
..

Who the fuck reads a newspaper anymore? Ever heard of the internet?

That's like saying "Who the fuck reads newspapers anymore? Ever heard of TV?"
The internet is not a news outlet.
TV is not a news outlet.
Thanks for proving my point to a "t".
.
.
.

You are lost in space. Newspapers give you the "news" they want you to have with their slant.

JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER OUTLET IN AMERICA

Nope.
You are wrong.

There are different rules of accountability for newspapers, cable tv news and internet websites.

Internet news websites are virtually untouchable by law and bypass by stating they are waiving all responsibility for their content as third party input.
That's legal.

Cable TV news channels don't have the same rules or regulations as network broadcast outlets ABC, NBC and CBS.
The FEC gives them wider reign to opine, which is exactly what they do.

Newspapers can be sued for libel, defamation and slander if they can't prove their content is fact in a court of law.

You can thank me now. You learned something today.
.
.
.

What does your post have to do with newspapers giving you the news they want you to read?


I never remember seeing the newspaper headline back in 1960 that "JFK is having an affair with marylian Monroe "


.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Read the post again.
You missed the main point: no newspapers in these areas.
And without access to local news, the city and county politicians are free to go absolutely unaccountable.

.
..

Who the fuck reads a newspaper anymore? Ever heard of the internet?

That's like saying "Who the fuck reads newspapers anymore? Ever heard of TV?"
The internet is not a news outlet.
TV is not a news outlet.
Thanks for proving my point to a "t".
.
.
.

You can get more news off the internet than from any hard-print paper. But I guess you like your black stained fingers. I guess next stop the ice-house?

So name some sites.
Come on, smarty pants.
Put up or shut up.
And remember, a blog is not a news outlet.
But I guess you didn't know that.

.
.
.

You can Google ANY NEWS OUTLET ON EARTH

Christ you need help

Uh-huh.
I thought so.
You can but I bet you don't.
.
.
.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Map is bullshit lol. Areas right outside of KC?

Get the fuck out with this nonsense. And FYI "local" news predominantly talk about local issues dummy. Cable news talk about politics 24/7 and you can get that shit everywhere ya moron.

Read the post again.
You missed the main point: no newspapers in these areas.
And without access to local news, the city and county politicians are free to go absolutely unaccountable.

.
..

Who the fuck reads a newspaper anymore? Ever heard of the internet?

That's like saying "Who the fuck reads newspapers anymore? Ever heard of TV?"
The internet is not a news outlet.
TV is not a news outlet.
Thanks for proving my point to a "t".
.
.


.

You can get more news off the internet than from any hard-print paper. But I guess you like your black stained fingers. I guess next stop the ice-house?

He's still waiting on his milk and cheese delivery. It's a few decades late

His avatar should read "Stuck in 1820"

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Who the fuck reads a newspaper anymore? Ever heard of the internet?

That's like saying "Who the fuck reads newspapers anymore? Ever heard of TV?"
The internet is not a news outlet.
TV is not a news outlet.
Thanks for proving my point to a "t".
.
.
.

You are lost in space. Newspapers give you the "news" they want you to have with their slant.

JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER OUTLET IN AMERICA

Nope.
You are wrong.

There are different rules of accountability for newspapers, cable tv news and internet websites.

Internet news websites are virtually untouchable by law and bypass by stating they are waiving all responsibility for their content as third party input.
That's legal.

Cable TV news channels don't have the same rules or regulations as network broadcast outlets ABC, NBC and CBS.
The FEC gives them wider reign to opine, which is exactly what they do.

Newspapers can be sued for libel, defamation and slander if they can't prove their content is fact in a court of law.

You can thank me now. You learned something today.
.
.
.

The only thing I learned is how desperate you are to be "right"

As I stated your map is bullshit. I lived in Lenexa KS when I went to college and did I get a Lenexa news paper? Nope but I did get the WSJ & NYT papers.
Based on your dumbass map and asinine conclusion I was uninformed. Obviously I was not

So "Grandpa", you haven't picked up the WSJ or the NYT in, oh, 40 years or so?
I figured that.
.
.
.

I have not touched ANY newspaper in YEARS. I have this newfangled thing called the internet! It's pretty amazing. I can get almost any papers site instantaneously from anywhere!

You should look into it.

Whatever happened to SAVING THE TREES?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Read the post again.
You missed the main point: no newspapers in these areas.
And without access to local news, the city and county politicians are free to go absolutely unaccountable.

.
..

Who the fuck reads a newspaper anymore? Ever heard of the internet?

That's like saying "Who the fuck reads newspapers anymore? Ever heard of TV?"
The internet is not a news outlet.
TV is not a news outlet.
Thanks for proving my point to a "t".
.
.
.

You are lost in space. Newspapers give you the "news" they want you to have with their slant.

JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER OUTLET IN AMERICA

Nope.
You are wrong.

There are different rules of accountability for newspapers, cable tv news and internet websites.

Internet news websites are virtually untouchable by law and bypass by stating they are waiving all responsibility for their content as third party input.
That's legal.

Cable TV news channels don't have the same rules or regulations as network broadcast outlets ABC, NBC and CBS.
The FEC gives them wider reign to opine, which is exactly what they do.

Newspapers can be sued for libel, defamation and slander if they can't prove their content is fact in a court of law.

You can thank me now. You learned something today.
.
.
.

What does your post have to do with newspapers giving you the news they want you to read?


I never remember seeing the newspaper headline back in 1960 that "JFK is having an affair with marylian Monroe "


.

The majority of households used to get their local newspapers plus in urban areas, a national newspaper.
It's dropped off like a rock since 2004.
People have turned to Facebook for their "news" or blog sites like Breitbart.
And Putin took advantage of the dumbed down American and flooded Facebook and Twitter with bots.
Just like you, he wanted Trump to win, too.
.
.
.

 

[Dreadnaught1968]

Trying to find excuses for Madame Resident Clintoon's loss. Too funny...

Hillary didn't lose the vote.
How quickly you morons forget.

Donald J. Trump - 62,980,160
Hillary R. Clinton - 65,845,063

Your head is full of Trump bullshit rhetoric.
You probably believe him when he said the turn out for his inauguration was bigger than Obama's, too.
.
.
.

How quickly you retards forget that the popular vote doesn't determine the winner, the electoral college does. And you have no clue what I believe.

I have a pretty good idea from your initial comment.
And your hypocrite Trump said it best:
NOte the date of his Tweet:


Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump

The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy.

10:45 PM - Nov 6, 2012
.
.
.
.

No, you have no clue. And Trump was wrong on both accounts.

So the party of personal responsibility is OK with someone else making their voting decisions for them.
Isn't that rich?
.
.
.

The party of personal responsibility understands how our elections work. If you don't like it, work towards getting it changed. If not, you have nothing to whine about.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

That's like saying "Who the fuck reads newspapers anymore? Ever heard of TV?"
The internet is not a news outlet.
TV is not a news outlet.
Thanks for proving my point to a "t".
.
.
.

You are lost in space. Newspapers give you the "news" they want you to have with their slant.

JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER OUTLET IN AMERICA

Nope.
You are wrong.

There are different rules of accountability for newspapers, cable tv news and internet websites.

Internet news websites are virtually untouchable by law and bypass by stating they are waiving all responsibility for their content as third party input.
That's legal.

Cable TV news channels don't have the same rules or regulations as network broadcast outlets ABC, NBC and CBS.
The FEC gives them wider reign to opine, which is exactly what they do.

Newspapers can be sued for libel, defamation and slander if they can't prove their content is fact in a court of law.

You can thank me now. You learned something today.
.
.
.

The only thing I learned is how desperate you are to be "right"

As I stated your map is bullshit. I lived in Lenexa KS when I went to college and did I get a Lenexa news paper? Nope but I did get the WSJ & NYT papers.
Based on your dumbass map and asinine conclusion I was uninformed. Obviously I was not

So "Grandpa", you haven't picked up the WSJ or the NYT in, oh, 40 years or so?
I figured that.
.
.
.

I have not touched ANY newspaper in YEARS. I have this newfangled thing called the internet! It's pretty amazing. I can get almost any papers site instantaneously from anywhere!

You should look into it.

Whatever happened to SAVING THE TREES?

I subscribe to NYT, WSJ and WaPo online, you stupid twit.
You're just trying to deviate from your ignorance about the difference between a news "blog" and a legitimate newspaper and the legal consequences of what they publish.
.
.
.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The only case for stupidity the OP is making is his own.

 

[Thinker101]

Yikes, anyone that feels the 2016 election can be explained with two maps has got to be dumber than shit.

 

[S.J.]

Such bullshit. Always looking for a way to explain why Trump is POTUS. The reason you lost is because you couldn't motivate the parasites and illegals enough to drag Hillary's fat ass over the finish line. It has nothing to do with lack of access to leftist newspapers or fake news. REAL Americans believe in the Constitution and don't want a socialist dictatorship, that's why you leftists want as many blood sucking parasites from shithole countries sneaking into the country as possible. It's the only hope you have of holding onto power.

 

[Wyatt earp]

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Yikes, anyone that feels the 2016 election can be explained with two maps has got to be dumber than shit.

And yet I did.
.
.
.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Such bullshit. Always looking for a way to explain why Trump is POTUS. The reason you lost is because you couldn't motivate the parasites and illegals enough to drag Hillary's fat ass over the finish line. It has nothing to do with lack of access to leftist newspapers or fake news. REAL Americans believe in the Constitution and don't want a socialist dictatorship, that's why you leftists want as many blood sucking parasites from shithole countries sneaking into the country as possible. It's the only hope you have of holding onto power.

I didn't lose.
I don't like Hillary either.
She was a lousy candidate.
And the racists, both the public ones and the closeted ones, wanted Trump.
He based his campaign on fear of Mexicans and Muslims.
In Trump's own words, creating fear amongst the many stupid is his power.
.
.
.

 

[Kondor3]

Voilà!

This map below shows support for Trump by state:

The red and yellow areas are "news deserts" meaning areas that have no access to newspapers or local news broadcasts.

,
.
.

Pure hor$e$hit...

1. newspapers have been largely replaced by television and radio and the internet

2. Democrats are still in denial over the idea that their agenda and behaviors and candidates were to blame

Re: (2) (above)... that truly smacks of juvenile behavior from these collective Queens of Denial.

A little two-year-old child will think: "If I pull this blanket over my head, nobody can find me."

Democrats, dealing with abject humiliation, blame everybody but themselves for their unanticipated defeat.

Democrats made the mistake of blowing-off White Straight Christian America.

Democrats made the mistake of denouncing that demographic as Deplorables and as uneducated and uninformed.

They're still making that mistake, two years after that demographic kicked their silly asses in the Electoral College.

Every month that you idiots forego looking in the mirror and adjusting, you give the Other Guys reason for laughter and jubilation.

Because you remain delusional, you simply aren't stable nor reliable nor realistic enough nor generally ready for Prime Time again.

Some retards just never learn.

 

[EasyPeasy]

Map is bullshit lol. Areas right outside of KC?

Get the fuck out with this nonsense. And FYI "local" news predominantly talk about local issues dummy. Cable news talk about politics 24/7 and you can get that shit everywhere ya moron.

Read the post again.
You missed the main point: no newspapers in these areas.
And without access to local news, the city and county politicians are free to go absolutely unaccountable.

.
..

Who the fuck reads a newspaper anymore? Ever heard of the internet?

That's like saying "Who the fuck reads newspapers anymore? Ever heard of TV?"
The internet is not a news outlet.
TV is not a news outlet.
Thanks for proving my point to a "t".
.
.
.

You can get more news off the internet than from any hard-print paper. But I guess you like your black stained fingers. I guess next stop the ice-house?

So name some sites.
Come on, smarty pants.
Put up or shut up.
And remember, a blog is not a news outlet.
But I guess you didn't know that.

.
.
.

Here's a thought...... GOOGLE

You can find all the news you want. Matter of fact, most major news outlets have websites!!!! IMAGINE THAT SHIT!!!

 

[EasyPeasy]

Yikes, anyone that feels the 2016 election can be explained with two maps has got to be dumber than shit.

And yet I did.
.
.
.

Thus, yet you are.

 

[Thinker101]

Yikes, anyone that feels the 2016 election can be explained with two maps has got to be dumber than shit.

And yet I did.
.
.
.

There ya go, glad my assessment was true.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Voilà!

This map below shows support for Trump by state:

The red and yellow areas are "news deserts" meaning areas that have no access to newspapers or local news broadcasts.

,
.
.

Pure hor$e$hit...

1. newspapers have been largely replaced by television and radio and the internet

2. Democrats are still in denial over the idea that their agenda and behaviors and candidates were to blame

Re: (2) (above)... that truly smacks of juvenile behavior from these collective Queens of Denial.

A little two-year-old child will think: "If I pull this blanket over my head, nobody can find me."

Democrats, dealing with abject humiliation, blame everybody but themselves for their unanticipated defeat.

Democrats made the mistake of blowing-off White Straight Christian America.

Democrats made the mistake of denouncing that demographic as Deplorables and as uneducated and un-American.

They're still making that mistake, two years after that demographic kicked their silly asses in the Electoral College.

Every month that you idiots forego looking in the mirror and adjusting, you give the Other Guys reason for laughter and jubilation.

Because you remain delusional, you simply aren't stable nor reliable nor realistic enough nor generally ready for Prime Time again.

Some retards just never learn.

Yeah, you're right.
1. Newspapers have been replaced by the internet.
And that's the problem.
Millions get their "news" from Facebook.

Newspapers would be sued for something like this. Facebook can't.

Facebook approved 100 fake ad disclosures that were allegedly 'paid for' by every United States senator

"""Facebook approved 100 fake political ad disclaimers that claimed to be paid for by every US senator, submitted by Vice News as part of an experiment. The social network began using the "paid for by" disclaimer in May, as a way to boost transparency in political advertising ahead of November's general election."""
.
.
.

 

[Preacher]

Voilà!

This map below shows support for Trump by state:

The red and yellow areas are "news deserts" meaning areas that have no access to newspapers or local news broadcasts.

,
.
.

Never heard of the internet eh dumb ass? SMH.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Voilà!

This map below shows support for Trump by state:

The red and yellow areas are "news deserts" meaning areas that have no access to newspapers or local news broadcasts.

,
.
.

Never heard of the internet eh dumb ass? SMH.

You've probably skipped over most of this thread and jumped immediately to your ignorant conclusion.
That is your right.

And I'll point something else out....When I post a thread, I always back up my content with a link to reliable sources.
Interestingly enough, those of who are are squawking about the internet never use it to back up yours.
.
.
.