In a fit of pique Ben Carson made the mistake of telling the truth:
Carson is not being ā. . . targeted by the āsecular progressive movement.ā. He is being targeted because he is guilty of campaigning as a spiritual leader. His comment proves it.
Carsonās problem is that Taqiyya the Liar got there first. Had the media nailed Taqiyya in 2008 he never would have won the nomination let alone won the general election. Assuming that 2012 was not rigged, a lot of Americans were wising up to his game by then. Taqiyyaās second win was a testament to the power of media bias more than it was a vote for a spiritual leader. Hell, the truth behind the attack in Benghazi was enough to topple the spiritual leader.
Just to clear on this. There is nothing wrong with being a decent spiritual man in their private lives. Speaking for myself, if I wanted a wannabe spiritual leader governing the country I would be the Chicago sewer ratās number one cheerleader.
For Carson to make such a statement clearly shows he must believe that parochial is more important than secular.
My point: Forget about the separation of church and state. Concentrate on separating spiritual hustlers from government if you do not want to end up living in a theocracy governed by garbage like Taqiyya the Liar.
Parenthetically, liberals attack Americaās Founders on moral grounds. After all, they were slave holders; Thomas Jefferson banged the black broad and so on.
Liberals dare not attack the Founders on their intellects and governing abilities. They had the wisdom to govern Colonial Americans who were, themselves, a moral people. Together they understood that religion and government do not mix. Among them they created a form of government that can only be toppled from within.
Carson, Taqiyya the Liar, et al. truly believe they can govern on the strength of their morals. Part of it is that morals are a helluva lot easier to govern by than actually doing something that accomplishes the most good for the most people.
The fact is: For centuries priesthoods of every stripe attempted to employ the power of government to govern by morals āā yet they all failed miserably. You would think that self-defined spiritual leaders would have noticed the failure rate by now.
NOTE: Islamās theocracy is the biggest failure of all. If you aināt a Muslim in a Muslim country you are in deep trouble.
In Short: I do not know if religious conservatives will be offended, but I sure as hell would have more confidence in Ben Carson if he displayed a portrait of any one of the Founding Fathers standing over him:
http://newsmachete.com/photos/carson2.jpg
Finally, a portrait of a black Jesus does not necessarily mean Ben Carson is a black racist. My fear is that Carson sees the black race as morally superior based on pigmentation.
The current spiritual leader in the White House lacked the intelligence to invent the sweetest long-running con job all black racists get away with āā the black race is morally superior race to every other race.
Taqiyya the liar simply incorporated superior black race ideology into his immigration policies for totalitarian government along the lines of Nazi Germanyās racial purity. The only part I love is that white touchy-feely freaks will believe him right up until the day black racists march them off to the ovens.
Sunday on NBCās āMeet the Press,ā Republican presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson said the extra scrutiny his past is under is because he is being targeted by the āsecular progressive movement.ā
Carson: Iām Being Targeted By the āSecular Progressive Movementā
by Pam Key
8 Nov 2015
Carson: I'm Being Targeted By the 'Secular Progressive Movement' - Breitbart
by Pam Key
8 Nov 2015
Carson: I'm Being Targeted By the 'Secular Progressive Movement' - Breitbart
Carson is not being ā. . . targeted by the āsecular progressive movement.ā. He is being targeted because he is guilty of campaigning as a spiritual leader. His comment proves it.
Carsonās problem is that Taqiyya the Liar got there first. Had the media nailed Taqiyya in 2008 he never would have won the nomination let alone won the general election. Assuming that 2012 was not rigged, a lot of Americans were wising up to his game by then. Taqiyyaās second win was a testament to the power of media bias more than it was a vote for a spiritual leader. Hell, the truth behind the attack in Benghazi was enough to topple the spiritual leader.
Just to clear on this. There is nothing wrong with being a decent spiritual man in their private lives. Speaking for myself, if I wanted a wannabe spiritual leader governing the country I would be the Chicago sewer ratās number one cheerleader.
For Carson to make such a statement clearly shows he must believe that parochial is more important than secular.
My point: Forget about the separation of church and state. Concentrate on separating spiritual hustlers from government if you do not want to end up living in a theocracy governed by garbage like Taqiyya the Liar.
Parenthetically, liberals attack Americaās Founders on moral grounds. After all, they were slave holders; Thomas Jefferson banged the black broad and so on.
Liberals dare not attack the Founders on their intellects and governing abilities. They had the wisdom to govern Colonial Americans who were, themselves, a moral people. Together they understood that religion and government do not mix. Among them they created a form of government that can only be toppled from within.
Carson, Taqiyya the Liar, et al. truly believe they can govern on the strength of their morals. Part of it is that morals are a helluva lot easier to govern by than actually doing something that accomplishes the most good for the most people.
The fact is: For centuries priesthoods of every stripe attempted to employ the power of government to govern by morals āā yet they all failed miserably. You would think that self-defined spiritual leaders would have noticed the failure rate by now.
NOTE: Islamās theocracy is the biggest failure of all. If you aināt a Muslim in a Muslim country you are in deep trouble.
In Short: I do not know if religious conservatives will be offended, but I sure as hell would have more confidence in Ben Carson if he displayed a portrait of any one of the Founding Fathers standing over him:
Will Ben Carson's painting of himself & Black Jesus offend religious conservatives?
Will Ben Carson's painting of himself & Black Jesus offend religious conservatives?
Will Ben Carson's painting of himself & Black Jesus offend religious conservatives?
Finally, a portrait of a black Jesus does not necessarily mean Ben Carson is a black racist. My fear is that Carson sees the black race as morally superior based on pigmentation.
The current spiritual leader in the White House lacked the intelligence to invent the sweetest long-running con job all black racists get away with āā the black race is morally superior race to every other race.
Taqiyya the liar simply incorporated superior black race ideology into his immigration policies for totalitarian government along the lines of Nazi Germanyās racial purity. The only part I love is that white touchy-feely freaks will believe him right up until the day black racists march them off to the ovens.