RollingThunder
Gold Member
- Mar 22, 2010
- 4,818
- 525
- 155
LOLOLOLOLOL......dude!....you have never, ever proved a point on your own....except perhaps in your own little delusional fantasy world where you seem to live all the time....your have no knowledge or understanding of science and your mathematical jazz is just stupid nonsense that has been repeatedly debunked by professional scientists. You are very obviously way over your head and you have no idea what you're talking about. You are the poster boy for the Dunning-Kruger Effect and I hear they're considering including your picture with the definition.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL......your delusions are hilarious, wiredup&bentover. Your position is backed up only by your very own mathematical delusions that actual scientists laugh at. All of your idiotic nonsense has been repeatedly debunked but you're too severely afflicted by the Dunning-Kruger Effect to be able to see that.
And you remain unable to prove a point on your own.
The fact is, you can't do the math either but you're too deluded and too victimized by the Dunning-Kruger Effect to be able to comprehend that. Like most intelligent people, I do, in general, trust modern science to give us an accurate reflection of reality. You are an anti-science nutjob who only imagines that you're as knowledgeable and competent as the actual experts but you are actually just very delusional and driven by your politics rather than the actual scientific facts.The fact is that you can't do the math so, like old rocks and konradv, hold your position as an article of faith.
I have proved you wrong every time on every thread we've debated on. My posts are backed up by the scientific evidence and analysis from actual climate scientists as published in reputable peer reviewed science journals and you have no backing except for your very own delusional pseudo-science and monumental ignorance.But hey, if you want to try and prove me wrong, by all means go visit wiki and bring what you learn to the appropriate thread.
If you actually had anything valid to say, you wouldn't be saying it here. You'd be publishing your data and conclusions in a peer-reviewed science journal. But in fact, your retarded pseudo-science and bad math would never get close to being published. Laughed at a lot by the journal editors, I'm sure, but no chance of passing peer review. But as usual with retards like you who have a touch of megalomania, you're convinced that you're right and the world scientific community is wrong. You and your fellow denier cultists are the new 'flat earthers".
As opposed to you who actually has nothing to say and are simply a cut and paste drone? At least I can speak to the topic in my own words thunder and if mathematics is required to make a point, I can do them. Cut and paste is all you have and all you will ever have.
LOLOL.....still avoiding the point, eh, little retard? If you actually had any valid points to make, you'd be making them to the world science community but in fact, they'd just laugh at you, so you're reduced to posting your nonsense on a political forum where you can try to fool some of the more dimwitted and scientifically ignorant rightwingnuts.
You speak to the topic in your own words all right but they are all still the words of an idiot who knows nothing about climate science. The only "point" you ever make is with the one on top of your skull and your faith in your own mathematical abilities is also one of your delusions. Your disdain for including scientific evidence in posts is just another reflection of your disconnect from reality.