Not only did he assault her he also committed battery on her.He didn't assault her you lying shitheel....wow... yeah cause if I don't like people assaulting little girls I don't deserve to live... You're some piece of shit.Again damn shame police will still protect you because you sure dont deserve it.Gentlemen don't order young girls in bikinis to get on the ground with their face in the dirt. Your defense of this ass hole.. is dumb.The pivotal word in the above statement is, "lawful." Do you believe Casebolt's conduct in this example was lawful? Or do you think his actions were extreme and entirely uncalled for? And I'm talking about socially accepted standards of conduct, not the standard which seems to have evolved in the arbitrary credo of Ptl. Casebolt and a lot of cops who think the way he does.
While it's possible Casebolt could manage to convince a judge or jury he actually felt threatened by that adolescent girl and it was therefore necessary to restrain her the way he did, I think you are sufficiently perceptive to know he either is lying, or he is much too paranoid and impulsive to be a police officer, or he has progressively acquired the orientation which has led to an increasing tendency on the part of cops to believe they know best how things should be done and public opinion be damned.
You should have stopped after the first 9 words. "Get on the ground" is a lawful order and it does mean within a reasonable amount of time.