Midnight Marauder
Rookie
- Feb 28, 2009
- 12,404
- 1,939
- 0
- Banned
- #21
I for one haven't seen anyone assuming that or asserting that. Perhaps you can prop up that strawman a little, with some actual examples.It's almost funny the way that some Rs just assume that if there were term limits, Repubs would win the majority back.
The same way Dems accepted the rejection by the voters of their policies in 1994? And accepted their further losses throughout the 90s and then twice for the White House? Pot, meet kettle!When will you all accept the rejection of Republican policies in 2006 and 2008 by the American voters?
One of the first steps in recovery is acceptance.
What we have now which you and other non-thinking blind partisans seem to be OK with, is one-party rule. Doesn't matter what party it is, one-party rule is the LAST thing anyone should want. Our system should always be adversarial, not kum-by-ya.
You voted for "change" and so far there's very little of it. Mostly we're seeing the continuation and magnification of the SAME policies the voters rejected! This should disturb you greatly though you shouldn't be surprised -- most of the things from the previous administration you object to, Dems supported with their Congressional votes! And the only change is, more of the same!
When will your known keen intellect kick in and eschew blind partisanship? When it does, so will buyer's remorse.