Tennessee Is Spot On

Geaux4it

Intensity Factor 4-Fold
May 31, 2009
22,873
4,294
290
Tennessee
This should be a national law. I just happen to be moving there tomorrow. Be back there in America by the 5th

-Geaux
_------------

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/u..._campaign=COTR

In one of the most awesome pro-gun laws to come down the pike, Tennessee is blaming business owners if they disarm citizens with “gun-free zones.”
http://bearingarms.com/jenn-j/2016/0...you-literally/

Quote:
As of July 1, if a handgun carry permit holder in Tennessee is injured, suffers bodily injury or death, incurs economic loss or expense, property damage or any other compensable loss on a property posted as a gun-free zone, they can sue the person or entity who stripped them of their right to self defense.
Hope other states follow suit.
__________________
 
Note to self; don't do business in Tennessee.

They should call it the Damned If You Do--Damned If You Don't State.
 
Tn. is a beautiful state. Best of luck in your move...

upload_2016-6-30_9-14-57.png
 
This should be a national law. I just happen to be moving there tomorrow. Be back there in America by the 5th

-Geaux
_------------

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/u..._campaign=COTR

In one of the most awesome pro-gun laws to come down the pike, Tennessee is blaming business owners if they disarm citizens with “gun-free zones.”
http://bearingarms.com/jenn-j/2016/0...you-literally/

Quote:
As of July 1, if a handgun carry permit holder in Tennessee is injured, suffers bodily injury or death, incurs economic loss or expense, property damage or any other compensable loss on a property posted as a gun-free zone, they can sue the person or entity who stripped them of their right to self defense.
Hope other states follow suit.
__________________


This is a stupid law.

If you own private property you have the right to tell people they can't carry guns on YOUR property. If you disagree with THEIR policy concerning THEIR property , stay off THEIR property. See how that fucking works.


God damned authoritarians.
 
Bu
This should be a national law. I just happen to be moving there tomorrow. Be back there in America by the 5th

-Geaux
_------------

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/u..._campaign=COTR

In one of the most awesome pro-gun laws to come down the pike, Tennessee is blaming business owners if they disarm citizens with “gun-free zones.”
http://bearingarms.com/jenn-j/2016/0...you-literally/

Quote:
As of July 1, if a handgun carry permit holder in Tennessee is injured, suffers bodily injury or death, incurs economic loss or expense, property damage or any other compensable loss on a property posted as a gun-free zone, they can sue the person or entity who stripped them of their right to self defense.
Hope other states follow suit.
__________________


This is a stupid law.

If you own private property you have the right to tell people they can't carry guns on YOUR property. If you disagree with THEIR policy concerning THEIR property , stay off THEIR property. See how that fucking works.


God damned authoritarians.
But your rules end up getting me killed then uh oh

-Geaux
 
Bu
This should be a national law. I just happen to be moving there tomorrow. Be back there in America by the 5th

-Geaux
_------------

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/u..._campaign=COTR

In one of the most awesome pro-gun laws to come down the pike, Tennessee is blaming business owners if they disarm citizens with “gun-free zones.”
http://bearingarms.com/jenn-j/2016/0...you-literally/

Quote:
As of July 1, if a handgun carry permit holder in Tennessee is injured, suffers bodily injury or death, incurs economic loss or expense, property damage or any other compensable loss on a property posted as a gun-free zone, they can sue the person or entity who stripped them of their right to self defense.
Hope other states follow suit.
__________________


This is a stupid law.

If you own private property you have the right to tell people they can't carry guns on YOUR property. If you disagree with THEIR policy concerning THEIR property , stay off THEIR property. See how that fucking works.


God damned authoritarians.
But your rules end up getting me killed then uh oh

-Geaux


So let me get this straight


guns don't kill people, people kill people and also rules against carrying guns kills people?


:rofl: I can't even begin to tell you how stupid I find that .
 
So....if you own a bar
You have to let the drunks be armed

If you go to a football game, the drunken fans from the other team are allowed to be both armed and obnoxious
 
The law makes sense. What if a California marina had a "spear gun free zone" and somebody was eaten by a shark when he might have defended himself with a spear gun? Wouldn't it be logical to sue the business?
 
The law makes sense. What if a California marina had a "spear gun free zone" and somebody was eaten by a shark when he might have defended himself with a spear gun? Wouldn't it be logical to sue the business?


No, in your made up scenario it wouldn't be reasonable. Moron

Ultimately, YOU have the final choice about whether you go somewhere where guns aren't permitted. YOU take the fucking risk if you choose to go there. This will NOT survive a challenge. It's stupid.
 
The law makes sense. What if a California marina had a "spear gun free zone" and somebody was eaten by a shark when he might have defended himself with a spear gun? Wouldn't it be logical to sue the business?


No, in your made up scenario it wouldn't be reasonable. Moron

Ultimately, YOU have the final choice about whether you go somewhere where guns aren't permitted. YOU take the fucking risk if you choose to go there. This will NOT survive a challenge. It's stupid.

Ultimately, YOU have the final choice about whether you go somewhere where guns aren't permitted.

And ultimately you have the final choice about allowing guns on property you own/control. If someone is hurt or killed because of the rules you have imposed you should be willing to accept responsibility for your actions and if not a court of law should require that you do.
 
The law makes sense. What if a California marina had a "spear gun free zone" and somebody was eaten by a shark when he might have defended himself with a spear gun? Wouldn't it be logical to sue the business?


No, in your made up scenario it wouldn't be reasonable. Moron

Ultimately, YOU have the final choice about whether you go somewhere where guns aren't permitted. YOU take the fucking risk if you choose to go there. This will NOT survive a challenge. It's stupid.

Ultimately, YOU have the final choice about whether you go somewhere where guns aren't permitted.

And ultimately you have the final choice about allowing guns on property you own/control. If someone is hurt or killed because of the rules you have imposed you should be willing to accept responsibility for your actions and if not a court of law should require that you do.


It's this kind of stupid bullshit that lets Progressive morons find any traction.
 
Does the law work both ways? If I'm in a bar, and some drunk with a gun shoots me is the bar owner to blame for allowing guns in his establishment?
 
Does the law work both ways? If I'm in a bar, and some drunk with a gun shoots me is the bar owner to blame for allowing guns in his establishment?
I don't see why it would. Murder isn't a Constitutional right lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top