Temperature measuring stations are still located in places that wreck their data.....

I don't care, they are both wrong.
I am almost completely certain that his statement originated as a very qualified possibility expressed by some scientist. The rate of sea ice extent decline was headed for a zero intercept at least that far back. That is, a plot of the ice extent data reasonably extended would have hit zero by 2014 or even earlier. But, like a lot of natural processes, it didn't remain on that track. That's one of the many reasons you see so many modal verbs in real science.

Imagine what these data looked like in, say, 2011.
ClimateDashboard_Arctic-sea-ice_graph_20221018_1400px.jpg
 
I am almost completely certain that his statement originated as a very qualified possibility expressed by some scientist. The rate of sea ice extent decline was headed for a zero intercept at least that far back. That is, a plot of the ice extent data reasonably extended would have hit zero by 2014 or even earlier. But, like a lot of natural processes, it didn't remain on that track. That's one of the many reasons you see so many modal verbs in real science.
It is a con. It is about control. It is about making human existence miserable except for the very few.
 
Can you point to a single scientific climate organization that backs your desperate opinion that AGW is not happening?

Why is that?
Can you point to a single scientific climate organization that backs your desperate opinion that Earth is not the stable center of the Universe and is suspended in the heavens on the backs of many turtles?
 
"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Ottmar IPCC 2010
 
What do you believe caused this?

2020_Global_Time_Series-1-1024x577.png

Natural climate variations of a bipolar glaciated planet. The geologic record is filthy with them. Why do you believe the planet’s temperature should be a flat line?
 
Can you point to a single scientific climate organization that backs your desperate opinion that Earth is not the stable center of the Universe and is suspended in the heavens on the backs of many turtles?
Why is no scientific organization willing to back your denial opinion?
 
An update on the 2009 report on the locations of temperature measuring stations in the U.S.........where you have temperature readers located next to heat vents.....and other silly things that make the data worthless...

The article mentioning the report is from Breitbart, and I also linked to the report they linked to...........




A study that investigated the placement of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) temperature stations foundthat 96 percent of the facilities used to measure heat failed to meet the agencies own “uncorrupted placement” standards.

Research for the study shows that the 96 percent corruption is because thestations’ measurements are tainted by the effects of urbanization – or heat produced because of their close proximity to asphalt, machinery, and other heat-producing, heat-trapping, or heat-accentuating objects.

The Heartland Institute compiled the report using satellite and in-person surveys of NOAA weather stations that contribute to the “official” land temperatures in the United States.

“With a 96 percent warm-bias in U.S. temperature measurements, it is impossible to use any statistical methods to derive an accurate climate trend for the U.S.” Heartland Institute Senior Fellow Anthony Watts, who directed the study, said is the study announcement distributed to the press. “Data from the stations that have not been corrupted by faulty placement show a rate of warming in the United States reduced by almost half compared to all stations.”
===========

From the actual report...

2022 SURFACE STATIONS SURVEY: EXAMPLES OF SITING ISSUES, GOOD AND BAD

This section presents photographic examples of USHCN and GHCN station siting. The majority of stations are not in compliance with NWS publication 10-1302, but examples of those in compliance are also given. Station locations, observed issues, and explanations are given in the image captions.
View attachment 675995 View attachment 675994

MMTS placement in COOP observer’s yard next to an ODOT maintenance facility in Basque, OR. Note the very large asphalt parking lot in the aerial photo and the yellow marker indicating the MMTS placement. Basque is an isolated small town, with the next town 30 miles away. It would be categorized as exceptionally rural, yet the GHCN thermometer is placed directly next to the largest heat sink. Source: Anthony Watts, Google Earth.
Bummer

Libs were hoping we had forgotten about their lies
 
KInd of like when every scientist told Galileo that he was wrong..........alll of the science organizations in his time told him the sun revolved around the earth........
Which scientists told Galileo that he was wrong?

The ones told by the church.
 
Bummer

Libs were hoping we had forgotten about their lies
This just in!!!

Climate deniers complaining about temperature recording stations not being placed in cool dark places.
 

Forum List

Back
Top