Television and the Hearts and Minds In The ME

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Annie, Jan 3, 2007.

  1. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    US is losing, badly:

    http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/127nftww.asp?pg=1

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. UnAmericanYOU
    Offline

    UnAmericanYOU VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    387
    Thanks Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +122
    Yes, we're losing this, too bad for us that the MSM is soooooooo liberal. They still want to try to "tolerate" radical Islamics.

    Can't often tell the difference between an AP article and a Al-Jazerra article. Zaraqwi has all the latest issues of Newsweek scattered around his last known safe house for a reason.

    Really sucks when a country such as Canada produces pro-Muslim, anti-Israel propoganda. "Little Mosque on the Prarie" springs to mind:

    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/02102006/3...sque-prairie-aims-ease-religious-tension.html

    Gee, a sensitive topic, who'da thunk? Propoganda disguised as humor....
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. ekrem
    Offline

    ekrem VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    7,243
    Thanks Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +375
    Are there any other proofs besides this article, that this Al-Qaeda TV?
    Even if so, the thread headline is simplified. Allthough not knowing TV-Stations in ME besides Turkish ones, i assume that overwhelming ( >99%) of TV-Stations have nothing to do with Insurgents, Terrorists or how you call them.
     
  4. trobinett
    Offline

    trobinett Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,832
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Arkansas, The Ozarks
    Ratings:
    +162
    Yea, I've read a few articles about these kind of goings on, and I've found it more than a little confusing.:confused:

    First, how can ANYBODY out spin the USA, I mean, we've got people that make a career out of "spin doctoring"?

    To think of the US loosing a propaganda war is just dumb founding. I know I've found myself thinking that maybe this is one of those, double, double cross deals. Our spin is so good, people don't even know we're spinning.

    Yea, kinda crazy huh?:cuckoo:

    Second, why do otherwise intelligent people buy into propaganda from know terror organizations? I wouldn't trust ANY information coming out of such sources. I don't know, maybe its just me, but we don't seem to apply the same critical eye to foreign sources as we do to our own.:sad:

    Am off base with my feelings, what's the board's feelings?:eusa_think:
     
  5. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Actually I believe the 'audience' were those proned to believing the alternative. Sort of related to this:

    http://usmessageboard.com/showthread.php?t=46327
     
  6. trobinett
    Offline

    trobinett Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,832
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Arkansas, The Ozarks
    Ratings:
    +162
    That was an eye opening article.

    I still wonder though, if we are actually "losing" the propaganda wars, and if so, HOW?
     
  7. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Hell, the 'right' is losing it at home, daily.
     
  8. trobinett
    Offline

    trobinett Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,832
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Arkansas, The Ozarks
    Ratings:
    +162
    Well, yea, your right I guess, shit........:sad:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    I know...
     
  10. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    Washington calls it the "smoking gun" that puts Bin Laden's guilt beyond doubt, but many in the Arab world believe the home video of the al-Qaeda chief is a fake. Could it be?
    The sound is muffled, the image at times blurred and juddery, but the dialogue - if genuine - is damning.

    Osama Bin Laden, or someone who looks a lot like him, talks on camera about his prior knowledge of the 11 September attacks on the World Trade Center.

    But while Washington's allies have been quick to judge the tape as evidence of Bin Laden's guilt, many in the Arab world doubt its authenticity.

    There have been:


    Claims that the Bin Laden figure is a look-alike
    Suspicions that Bin Laden's voice has been dubbed over the original soundtrack
    Allegations that Bin Laden was not discussing the WTC attacks, but an assault on US military targets some years ago
    Rudimentary film editing - overlaying a new soundtrack, changing the order of the film - is open to anyone with a camcorder or some basic PC software.



    It would be much more convincing if he was face-on to the camera

    Nikki Nahal
    Experts in the West seem in no doubt that the tape is genuine. But if it were fake, could it look convincing?

    A lot depends of whether lip movements on film match the words that are being spoken. In this case there is synchronisation between the voice and the lips, says linguist John Gibbons, of the University of Sydney.

    But the view of Bin Laden is not that clear, says video picture editor Nikki Nahal.

    "The more the person's head is facing away from the camera, the easier it is to con it. A lot of the picture of [Bin Laden] is side on and that does open the possibility that someone else's voice could be put on top," she says.

    "It would be much more convincing if he was face-on to the camera, a lot closer and the sound quality was better."

    Sound authentic

    But even then, it's not that simple, says Dr Peter French, a forensic expert specialising in audio, speech and language.



    His lips are synchronised, but that's not conclusive proof

    "You've got to make the conversation sound right. It's not just a case of getting the right words in the right order, but you have to think about the rhythm, the intonation and the pitch drift from the start to the end of a sentence," says Dr French.

    "It is possible to manipulate the pitch on some advanced computer software, but that's difficult to make convincing."

    Could such edits be detected on a third or fourth generation copy of a video tape?

    In the days before widespread digital technology, it was easy, says Dr French.

    Digital makes it difficult

    "You would look for 'switching transients' - surges of electrical energy transmitted from the heads of the tape recorder when it was switched to on or off.

    "These could be detected on screen or by putting the tape under a microscope."

    But today, using digital equipment, "it's possible to edit or fabricate in ways that completely defy forensic detection," says Dr French.

    So, if there was a section where the fakers couldn't get Bin Laden's lips to match the soundtrack they could cut and paste in a bit of film of someone else in the room. And no-one could be sure whether the edit was made by manipulating the video.

    But both Dr French and Ms Nahal agree that, unlike in stills photography, it's impossible to convincingly alter the picture by adding new elements or playing with the images.

    "I'd be able to spot something like that in the first frame," says Ms Nahal.
     

Share This Page