Taiwan leader is leading the way to protect their children against GMO's

cheering for the enslavement of the people. how lovely. people used to have that thing called, freedom of choice.
 
cheering for the enslavement of the people. how lovely. people used to have that thing called, freedom of choice.
What are you talking about?
I do not call non disclosure Freedom of choice. The moment people discover how disastrous GMO's are they run from it. It is like learning the preacher actually had his dick in your neighbor's wife all the while he was claiming that you should be righteous.
 
Another overblown crisis.
When the people's right to know is supplanted with bogus science and Congress desires to pass laws that deny the peoples right to know that the food they may be purchasing for themselves and their family be properly labeled as genetically modified that is a crisis.
 
I think this little minute long video says a lot if you have any common sense about having Botulism genes spliced into your corn products.


These guys won in a lawsuit after being defamed and ridiculed for bringing about the truth of GMO corn.

When you look around you and see so many autoimmune diseases it is pretty clear that food must play a big part in that.
Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Chronic Disease

GLYPHOSATE IT BINDS MINERALS AND CUTS OFF THE PRODUCTION OF NEUROTRANSMITTERS AND HORMONES....A VISUAL CONNECTION OF THE ROUTES OF DISEASES AND CANCER
 
Read the links.
I did.

Just because something is put into print or some news reports something it does not make it true. Like I said, "It is like learning the preacher actually had his dick in your neighbor's wife all the while he was claiming that you should be righteous."

You may go with the giants who also claim that all vaccines are safe and if parents do not vaccinate their children the state has a right to force them to do it.

Fixing Our Broken Food System: The Plate of the Union Initiative

And from GMOs Linked to Organ Disruption in 19 Studies - Institute for Responsible Technology
"


A new paper shows that consuming genetically modified (GM) corn or soybeans leads to significant organ disruptions in rats and mice, particularly in livers and kidneys. By reviewing data from 19 animal studies, Professor Gilles-Eric Séralini and others reveal that 9% of the measured parameters, including blood and urine biochemistry, organ weights, and microscopic analyses (histopathology), were significantly disrupted in the GM-fed animals. The kidneys of males fared the worst, with 43.5% of all the changes. The liver of females followed, with 30.8%. The report, published in Environmental Sciences Europe on March 1, 2011, confirms that “several convergent data appear to indicate liver and kidney problems as end points of GMO diet effects.” The authors point out that livers and kidneys “are the major reactive organs” in cases of chronic food toxicity.

“Other organs may be affected too, such as the heart and spleen, or blood cells,” stated the paper. In fact some of the animals fed genetically modified organisms had altered body weights in at least one gender, which is “a very good predictor of side effects in various organs.”

The GM soybean and corn varieties used in the feeding trials “constitute 83% of the commercialized GMOs” that are currently consumed by billions of people. While the findings may have serious ramifications for the human population, the authors demonstrate how a multitude of GMO-related health problems could easily pass undetected through the superficial and largely incompetent safety assessments that are used around the world.

Feed’em longer!

One of the most glaring faults in the current regulatory regime is the short duration of animals feeding studies. The industry limits trials to 90 days at most, with some less than a month. Only two studies reviewed in this new publication were over 90 days—both were non-industry research.

Short studies could easily miss many serious effects of GMOs. It is well established that some pesticides and drugs, for example, can create effects that are passed on through generations, only showing up decades later. IN the case of the drug DES (diethylstilbestrol), “induced female genital cancers among other problems in the second generation.” The authors urge regulators to require long-term multi-generational studies, to “provide evidence of carcinogenic, developmental, hormonal, neural, and reproductive potential dysfunctions, as it does for pesticides or drugs.”

Pesticide Plants”

Nearly all GM crops are described as “pesticide plants.” They either tolerate doses of weed killer, such as Roundup, or produce an insecticide called Bt-toxin. In both cases, the added toxin—weedkiller or bug killer—is found inside the corn or soybeans we consume.

When regulators evaluate the toxic effects of pesticides, they typically require studies using three types of animals, with at least one feeding trial lasting 2 years or more. One third or more of the side effects produced by these toxins will show up only in the longer study—not the shorter ones. But for no good reason, regulators ignore the lessons learned from pesticides and waive the GM crops-containing-pesticides onto the market with a single species tested for just 90 days. The authors affirm that “it is impossible, within only 13 weeks, to conclude about the kind of pathology that could be induced by pesticide GMOs and whether it is a major pathology or a minor one. It is therefore necessary to prolong the tests.”

GMO approvals also ignore the new understanding that toxins don’t always follow a linear dose-response. Sometimes a smaller amount of toxins have greater impact than larger doses. Approvals also overlook the fact that mixtures can be far more dangerous than single chemicals acting alone. Roundup residues, for example, have been “shown to be toxic for human placental, embryonic, and umbilical cord cells,” whereas Roundup’s active ingredient glyphosate does not on its own provoke the same degree of damage. One reason for this is that the chemicals in Roundup “stabilize glyphosate and allow its penetration into cells.”

Furthermore, toxins may generate new substances (metabolites) “either in the GM plant or in the animals fed with it.” Current assessments completely ignore the potential danger from these new components in our diets, such as the “new metabolites” in GMOs engineered to withstand Roundup. The authors warn, “We consider this as a major oversight in the present regulations.”

It’s not the same stuff that farmers spray

Regulators claim that the Bt-toxin produced inside GM corn is safe. They say that the Bt gene comes from soil bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which has been safely applied as a spray-on insecticide by farmers in the past. But the authors insist that “the argument about ‘safe use history’ of the wild Bt protein . . . cannot, on a sound scientific basis, be used for direct authorizations of . . . GM corns,” without conducting proper long-term animal feeding studies......more at link
 
"Don't believe it because it's in print!" he cries, then copies and pastes a spamalanch. :rolleyes:
 
"Don't believe it because it's in print!" he cries, then copies and pastes a spamalanch. :rolleyes:
No I don't believe it just because your news source says it is so. Money does not mean much to us poor folks in the cheap seats but the health of our families do and you keep on pushing the big agra agenda and we will keep refusing to buy the shit. As the more become aware of what happens the more will tell you that "the debate is over" because we don't won't that crap in our food. Hows that work for you?
 
Hey, look at the sky......it's falling!
No the people are bloating due to the fattening genetically altered food and additives (organ damage also).

genetically-modified-chickens.jpg


Obesity-Stats.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top