Diuretic
Permanently confused
Thanks for that info ncarolinadixie.
Also just another point. I'm not sure of the exact charge and conviction. I hear "statutory rape". Now I don't want to get into a big dust-up about terminology but where I am the offence of having sex with a minor is called unlawful sexual intercourse. Rape is a different and more serious offence. The primary difference is that in a case of rape the consent (properly called "submission") of the victim is gained by - broadly speaking - force, fear, fraud or otherwise overbearing the victim. Unlawful sexual intercourse is having consensual sex with someone who is not legally able to give that consent. The charge is more serious with the younger age of the victim.
None of this detracts from my view that Polanski should be returned to the original jurisdiction and dealt with according to the law.
Also just another point. I'm not sure of the exact charge and conviction. I hear "statutory rape". Now I don't want to get into a big dust-up about terminology but where I am the offence of having sex with a minor is called unlawful sexual intercourse. Rape is a different and more serious offence. The primary difference is that in a case of rape the consent (properly called "submission") of the victim is gained by - broadly speaking - force, fear, fraud or otherwise overbearing the victim. Unlawful sexual intercourse is having consensual sex with someone who is not legally able to give that consent. The charge is more serious with the younger age of the victim.
None of this detracts from my view that Polanski should be returned to the original jurisdiction and dealt with according to the law.