Surprise Arizona finds 68,000 vote in favor of Dem Kyrsten Sinema

The Muslim ban violates the Constitution and didn't actually ban Muslims from the countries who have committed terrorism in the USA. Nor did it ban Muslims from countries where Trump does business. So really, this was a ban of brown people from "shithole countries". They threw in Venezuela just so they could say it wasn't just Muslims being banned.
Actually, "the Constitution" itself IS a Muslim ban. It bans Islam in Article 6, Section 2 (the Supremacy Clause), which bans all supremacisms (other than the constitution itself of course). Section 2 does not mention any exception being made for Islam Islam (the largest supremacism in the world)

The Muslim ban, as I said was way to small, and should have included ALL Muslims around the world. It has nothing to do with "brown people", as many Muslims (see Post # 108) are white, and does not include most of the continent of Africa.
 
2. Total bullshit. These people aren't criminals, they're asylum seekers and should not be jailed. Taking their children away from them and then shipping the children thousands of miles is a violation of human rights, and just plain beyond the pale of human decency. These families will never fully recover from these traumas. Humans rights charges should be filed against anyone involved in this horror. Those who received this order from Trump and didn't refuse to carry it out should be included in the charges filed.
"These people" forcibly busted their way into Mexico, knocking down barriers, and attacking Mexican police with rocks and bottles. They criminally violated Mexico's border laws, and proclaim they will do the same when they reach the US border.

They are not seeking asylum from high crime/homicide, as proven by the fact that there are countries closer to their countries with lower crime-homicide rates than the US (ex. Aruba, Cuba, Martinique) They are coming to America attracted by US liberals showing off various types of welfare goodies$$, not available to them in those other countries.

And where is your concern for AMERICAN kids separated from THEIR convict parents ? (crickets**crickets**)
 
3. Yes there is. White supremacists committed the violence in Charlottesville. The people gathered were white supremacists and neo-nazis. Nothing they did justifies murder white the marchers did as well as several other acts of violence.
Actually, they did not. The violence came from the leftist counter-protesters who were illegally blocking the street, that the marchers (most of whom were just people protesting the removal of a Robt E Lee statue) were trying to legally walk on.
And it was never determined WHO these so-called "neo-nazis" were. Actual neo-nazis ? Or leftist agent provocateurs posing as Nazis ?

Got anymore excuses for your criminal street-blocking, fight-starting thugs ?

Here's a hint. If protestors are blocking the street, it's illegal to use your car to clear them out.

Yes, it was determined EXACTLY who they were. Richard Spencer proudly took credit, and held a second march to celebrate the first one a year later. Less than two dozen people showed up.
 
Tipsycatlover said:
Every time boxes of ballots are found, they are all for democrats.
Found By Democrats
The Certifiable Chain Of Possession
Just Set Them Down Somewhere....
 
The Muslim ban violates the Constitution and didn't actually ban Muslims from the countries who have committed terrorism in the USA. Nor did it ban Muslims from countries where Trump does business. So really, this was a ban of brown people from "shithole countries". They threw in Venezuela just so they could say it wasn't just Muslims being banned.
Actually, "the Constitution" itself IS a Muslim ban. It bans Islam in Article 6, Section 2 (the Supremacy Clause), which bans all supremacisms (other than the constitution itself of course). Section 2 does not mention any exception being made for Islam Islam (the largest supremacism in the world)

The Muslim ban, as I said was way to small, and should have included ALL Muslims around the world. It has nothing to do with "brown people", as many Muslims (see Post # 108) are white, and does not include most of the continent of Africa.

No it's not a Muslim ban. The Supremacy Clause simply states that Federal Law is the final law of the land, and where state laws conflict, Federal Law takes supremacy. It has nothing to do with religion. But it does make a good case that bakers who think homosexuality is a sin still have to bake the cake.
 
In the past, Sinema bashed the U.S. military as zombie-like terrorist slaughterers of the innocent.
She said stay-at-home mothers are “leeches.”

She detests representing Arizona as a Congresswoman, claiming the Grand Canyon state should serve as a “warning symbol.”

SURPRISE! Arizona Finds 68,000 More Votes In Favor of Dem Kyrsten Sinema



There needs to be ANOTHER ELECTION HELD!! This snide stupid pos who does n't even know who her partner should be since she swings both ways is suppose to take charge of AZ PPL. .. this bitch cheated!! LOL
If this complete airhead goes to the Senate it is a sign our nation is fucked.

You are the typical airhead Trump supporter. McSalley has chosen the dark side by going too far to the right. Trump is the one who is fucking us.
Your a Marxist and a threat to our nation.
 
The Muslim ban violates the Constitution and didn't actually ban Muslims from the countries who have committed terrorism in the USA. Nor did it ban Muslims from countries where Trump does business. So really, this was a ban of brown people from "shithole countries". They threw in Venezuela just so they could say it wasn't just Muslims being banned.
Actually, "the Constitution" itself IS a Muslim ban. It bans Islam in Article 6, Section 2 (the Supremacy Clause), which bans all supremacisms (other than the constitution itself of course). Section 2 does not mention any exception being made for Islam Islam (the largest supremacism in the world)

The Muslim ban, as I said was way to small, and should have included ALL Muslims around the world. It has nothing to do with "brown people", as many Muslims (see Post # 108) are white, and does not include most of the continent of Africa.

No it's not a Muslim ban. The Supremacy Clause simply states that Federal Law is the final law of the land, and where state laws conflict, Federal Law takes supremacy. It has nothing to do with religion. But it does make a good case that bakers who think homosexuality is a sin still have to bake the cake.
I don’t want the federal government getting involved in issues of cakes and cookies. Way too far.
 
See here is the problem with your numbers. Even Republicans don't want the wall, don't think Trump is doing a good job, and last but not least, they actually want to keep their Obamacare.

That #WalkAway movement right wingers have been touting is real. But it's not Democrats walking away from their party, it's Republicans who are disgusted by Trump, his sleazy cabinet, his pandering to racists and white supremacists, and his lying. And they want the House and Senate to do their job and limit his power and give oversight, because the Muslim ban, the separation of families at the border, and the coddling of white supremacists should NEVER have been allowed to happen.

I cannot overemphasize the importance of holding Trump accountable for these crimes against humanity. The House and Senate should have prevented all of them from happening. That they didn't is why the American people are standing up and voting for a more moral, responsible government.

I guess you've been watching too much CNN. There is no "WalkAway from Trump.
Unlike any of the thought about possible candidates for President on the Democrat side (whose approval numbers are 25% or lower among Democrats), among Republicans, Trump has an 87% approval rate nationwide >>

Trump's approval rating tops Obama's midterm numbers, poll shows

and his standing in Arizona is better than it is with the nation as a whole >>>

Arizona Republic poll: Voters split on Trump, but reject impeachment

And your reasons for disliking Trump are nothing but liberal media balderdash.

1. Muslim ban is necessary to PROTECT America from the Muslim ideology which is committed to overthrow the US govt and establish an Islamic state, which would impose harsh immoral standards, illegal under current US laws. Only problem with the Muslim ban is it only covers 8 countries. It should cover ALL Muslims from the whole world (with just a few exceptions)

2. Separation of families at the border is no different than millions of American families separated when parents are imprisoned. What did you think ? The kids go to prison with their parents ? American kids of convicted criminals are separated from their parents for DECADES, and in some cases for life. Some kids parents get executed. Do you complain for THEM ?

3. There is no coddling of white supremacists by Trump. This is more CNN/MSNBC drivel talk. What Trump said about Charlottesville was right. There was good on both sides. On one were legally permitted marchers protesting removal of a Robert E Lee statue (with some Nazis among them - at least they appeared to be).
Other side were counterprotestors sitting down in the street, illegally blocking the march, and THEY are who caused the violence and rioting.

Only according to Rasmussen. Republicans are having huge issues with the suburbs and suburban women. Democrats won suburban women by a larger margin than Clinton did. That happened in the 2017 Governor's race in Virginia. The coalition of suburban and rural voters that Reagan forged is collapsing under Trump. I suggest the reason that Trump is popular in the Republican Party is because Republicans who oppose Trump have left the party and become Independents.

1. Your goal is keeping America lily white. Muslims and especially women are suppressed and terrorized by terrorists. Most Muslims are peaceful and the attacks in this country have been committed by people who are citizens already.

2. The fact is that separating the children is wrong. Their parents have not committed major crimes of the type you suggest. Sessions even admitted it was a attempt to punish the parents.

3. Yes there is. White supremacists committed the violence in Charlottesville. The people gathered were white supremacists and neo-nazis. Nothing they did justifies murder white the marchers did as well as several other acts of violence.

Got anymore excuses for your white supremacist buddies.
The Antifa terrorist that gathered there for violent purposes did not have a legal permit from Charlottesville. Legally they were wrong. Separating criminal families is not wrong. Legally it is justified. Because of our post 9-11 world Muslims from areas that breed terrorists must be viewed with suspicion. Legally the Supreme Court has ruled President Trump correct on his use of executive order to protect our nation.
 
See here is the problem with your numbers. Even Republicans don't want the wall, don't think Trump is doing a good job, and last but not least, they actually want to keep their Obamacare.

That #WalkAway movement right wingers have been touting is real. But it's not Democrats walking away from their party, it's Republicans who are disgusted by Trump, his sleazy cabinet, his pandering to racists and white supremacists, and his lying. And they want the House and Senate to do their job and limit his power and give oversight, because the Muslim ban, the separation of families at the border, and the coddling of white supremacists should NEVER have been allowed to happen.

I cannot overemphasize the importance of holding Trump accountable for these crimes against humanity. The House and Senate should have prevented all of them from happening. That they didn't is why the American people are standing up and voting for a more moral, responsible government.

I guess you've been watching too much CNN. There is no "WalkAway from Trump.
Unlike any of the thought about possible candidates for President on the Democrat side (whose approval numbers are 25% or lower among Democrats), among Republicans, Trump has an 87% approval rate nationwide >>

Trump's approval rating tops Obama's midterm numbers, poll shows

and his standing in Arizona is better than it is with the nation as a whole >>>

Arizona Republic poll: Voters split on Trump, but reject impeachment

And your reasons for disliking Trump are nothing but liberal media balderdash.

1. Muslim ban is necessary to PROTECT America from the Muslim ideology which is committed to overthrow the US govt and establish an Islamic state, which would impose harsh immoral standards, illegal under current US laws. Only problem with the Muslim ban is it only covers 8 countries. It should cover ALL Muslims from the whole world (with just a few exceptions)

2. Separation of families at the border is no different than millions of American families separated when parents are imprisoned. What did you think ? The kids go to prison with their parents ? American kids of convicted criminals are separated from their parents for DECADES, and in some cases for life. Some kids parents get executed. Do you complain for THEM ?

3. There is no coddling of white supremacists by Trump. This is more CNN/MSNBC drivel talk. What Trump said about Charlottesville was right. There was good on both sides. On one were legally permitted marchers protesting removal of a Robert E Lee statue (with some Nazis among them - at least they appeared to be).
Other side were counterprotestors sitting down in the street, illegally blocking the march, and THEY are who caused the violence and rioting.

Only according to Rasmussen. Republicans are having huge issues with the suburbs and suburban women. Democrats won suburban women by a larger margin than Clinton did. That happened in the 2017 Governor's race in Virginia. The coalition of suburban and rural voters that Reagan forged is collapsing under Trump. I suggest the reason that Trump is popular in the Republican Party is because Republicans who oppose Trump have left the party and become Independents.

1. Your goal is keeping America lily white. Muslims and especially women are suppressed and terrorized by terrorists. Most Muslims are peaceful and the attacks in this country have been committed by people who are citizens already.

2. The fact is that separating the children is wrong. Their parents have not committed major crimes of the type you suggest. Sessions even admitted it was a attempt to punish the parents.

3. Yes there is. White supremacists committed the violence in Charlottesville. The people gathered were white supremacists and neo-nazis. Nothing they did justifies murder white the marchers did as well as several other acts of violence.

Got anymore excuses for your white supremacist buddies.
White people in the burbs feel safe. They need to get closer to the threat. They won’t vote Democrat if they get closer the where Democrats live.
 
3. There were NOT good people on both sides. White supremacists are not good people. At no time has Trump done anything but encourage the racists and the white supremacists. Including going out to tell jokes and hold a campaign rally the day after the Pittsburg shootings. This was a clear signal to his buddies in the nazi groups that what had happened was no big deal.

Deprogramming in Session:
First of all, as a leftist media dupe, you should know that you don't even know who the "sides" are. You've been led to believe that they are bad guy, white supremacists (neo-nazis of sorts) on one side, and good guy anti-racists on the other. This is the consistent line of the left media, politicians, think tanks, university professors, etc.

The true description is that the protestors, mostly good guys, were simply trying to exercise their first amendment right of free speech with a permit to march in protest of the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee. Among them were a small group of other protesters (neo-nazis maybe is the name) who were protesting the statue removal + left's habit of bashing white people, which does occur as in Affirmative Action, and other things.

What else they represent I don't now exactly. If it is similar to Hitler's Nazis, then of course I would despise that, but I wonder how many people actually know what they really do represent, or if the group in Charlottesville even really were neo-Nazis, and not agent provocateurs inserted by leftist agitators, to make the march look bad. Does anybody actually KNOW who they were ? Anybody wanna list some NAMES right here and now ?

Secondly, On the side of the counterprotestors, they had no legal (or moral) right to be sitting in the street blocking the legally permitted march. THEY were the bad guys who caused the violence. They could have stood on the sidewalks and counterprotested legally and properly, rather than forcing the marchers to stop marching, and forcibly breaking up the march.

Maybe Donald Trump was actually too generous by saying there were good people on both sides. Who, among people blocking a street, stopping cars and people marching, could be called "good" ? And who, by doing that, causing fighting to break out, could be called "good" ? As for the woman who got killed, nobody wants anything like that to happen, but if she had not been IN THE STREET blocking traffic, and had been on the sidewalks, she would not have been hit.

Leftist loon protestors who block traffic, in general, are lucky to not be hit by cars. That's what's liable to happen if you foolishly stand in front of them.
 
Last edited:
Most of these mail-in votes in Florida are from military stationed overseas.

Republicans want to disenfranchise the soldiers who are defending their freedom. Deplorable.
So if the mail-in votes are coming from soldiers overseas (who are overwhelmingly Republican - maybe 90%), then how come the overwhelmingly majority (if not all) of the new votes being counted are Democrat votes, as shown by the change from Republican win to Democrat win ?
 
Climb back into your vodka bottle, Comrade.
I'd rather stand on my US soil and denounce lowlife, unAmerican traitors like you, who damage our democracy.

PS - don't ever talk to a US military veteran like that, on Veterans' Day, you worm.
 
In the past, Sinema bashed the U.S. military as zombie-like terrorist slaughterers of the innocent.
She said stay-at-home mothers are “leeches.”

She detests representing Arizona as a Congresswoman, claiming the Grand Canyon state should serve as a “warning symbol.”

SURPRISE! Arizona Finds 68,000 More Votes In Favor of Dem Kyrsten Sinema



There needs to be ANOTHER ELECTION HELD!! This snide stupid pos who does n't even know who her partner should be since she swings both ways is suppose to take charge of AZ PPL. .. this bitch cheated!! LOL

We in America live presently under a Leftwing judicial dictatorship.
 
We in America live presently under a Leftwing judicial dictatorship.
Presently, but not for long. SCOTUS has 5-4 Republican majority (soon to be 6-3)and almost 100 conservative judges have been appointed to appeals courts by President Trump. The days of liberals ruling America from the courts are over.

Example: 2 liberal judges (Washington & Haweii) overturned Trump's Muslim ban. They, in turn, were overruled by the US Supreme Court, and the ban stands.
 
Here's a hint. If protestors are blocking the street, it's illegal to use your car to clear them out.

Yes, it was determined EXACTLY who they were. Richard Spencer proudly took credit, and held a second march to celebrate the first one a year later. Less than two dozen people showed up.

1. Can you cite the specific law, regarding what you said is illegal ?

2. Richard Spencer is ONE man. One man is not a description of "they"
 

Forum List

Back
Top