Supreme Court rejects Utah brothers’ lawsuit seeking to return Donald Trump to the White House

[okfine]

Rightwinger Liz Cheney called him unfit for office

I knew it before 2016.

 

[Foxfyre]

edited or not, does it show people attacking LE

Yes. Among tens of thousands of people there are always going to be some bad actors and idiots. But the J6 commission, dishonest media, etc. also continue to put out the propaganda of attacks on LE that never happened, injuries to LE that never happened, deaths of LE that never happened.

Until both sides are willing to be honest about what happened that day, it is unlikely that any real justice will be done. Even some top Democrats admit that due process was not used in either Trump impeachment or by the J6 Commission. That should not be okay with any honorable person no matter what their personal feelings about personalities are involved.

There was no coup that day. No attempt to overthrow the government. No insurrection. And selectively edited video and flat out lies distributed to the general public does not change that fact.

 

[Foxfyre]

you just avoided the question, by replying about something else

I don't believe I did.

 

[BlindBoo]

The illegality was at the state level.
I've explained this to you before.
You are unwilling to understand the truth.

So, you make an argument that you don't seem to actually believe in.

The end.

Yes I've heard this allegation repeated many times.
First it was a multi state conspiracy.
Allegation are easy to understand. Providing proof is a different kettle of fish.

The constitution gives Congress the power and authority to count the states votes, tally them, and declare who wins.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

the J6 commission, dishonest media, etc. also continue to put out the propaganda of attacks on LE that never happened, injuries to LE that never happened, deaths of LE that never happened.

really? So worn testimony given to the committee were lies?

 

[Foxfyre]

really? So worn testimony given to the committee were lies?

Mostly hearsay and propaganda in my opinion with some of it fed to the 'witnesses' to say. For instance the Secret Service immediately publicly discredited Cassidy Hutchinson's completely manufactured story about Trump's behavior. All of it selectively edited, coached, and rehearsed and with no witnesses allowed that would offer different testimony and no cross examination of any witnesses, no due process of any kind was used. Unless the WHOLE truth, ALL the truth, and nothing BUT the truth is utilized, no testimony is worth much to convict or absolve anybody. The J6 Commission certainly did not even attempt to provide that.

How many times did the J6 committee, anti-Trumpers on Twitter, Facebook, message boards etc. show those idiots in war paint and such marching toward the camera. But did you see the Capitol policeman escorting those same guys into the congressional chamber and how peaceful and orderly that was until I posted it? The J6 commission had no intent of anybody in the public seeing that. Or the hours and hours of video showing most of the people just wandering around looking at stuff and doing absolutely nothing illegal after being admitted by the Capitol police and with the Capitol police present, chatting with them, making no effort to encourage them to vacate the premises.

Until Patriots admit the riot was wrong, destructive, counter productive, an evil thing and the left admits that what we had on Jan 6 was definitely a legal mostly peaceful protest upstaged by a relative few instigating a stupid riot, the truth will be elusive for most.

But there was no coup. No insurrection. No intent or effort to overthrow the government. Hopefully the new House majority will show the rest of the story. Are you okay with that?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Violating their oath of office is the complaint, bigger turd.

And not one single court in the land found that they did that....including the SC.

Sucks to be you

 

[Billiejeens]

Yes I've heard this allegation repeated many times.
First it was a multi state conspiracy.
Allegation are easy to understand. Providing proof is a different kettle of fish.

The constitution gives Congress the power and authority to count the states votes, tally them, and declare who wins.

That addressed nothing relevant.

 

[BlindBoo]

what is a 'partisan Congress' and how would a Congress look to be non partisan?

SOP. Imagine if all they had to do was open an investigation and just by their will alone could abrogate the citizens votes of any state by a claim of corruption.

The closest I've ever seen Congress acting non partisan was on 9-12-2001.

 

[Foxfyre]

And not one single court in the land found that they did that....including the SC.

Sucks to be you

Not one single court in the land, including the SC, has ever heard a case as to whether they violated their oath of office.

 

[notmyfault2020]

I heard a "friend of the court" brief suggested the court should slap the shit out of the plaintiffs for being such dumb bastards, and wasting the court's time -----but mostly just for the dumb bastard thing.

who cares what baby killers think?

Get lost.. go find a lib forum

 

[notmyfault2020]

Not one single court in the land, including the SC, has ever heard a case as to whether they violated their oath of office.

which means that the case against the Steal folks has never been heard, therefore never rejected

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Not one single court in the land, including the SC, has ever heard a case as to whether they violated their oath of office.

This case has made it through many levels of courts. None found the claim to be credible.

 

[candycorn]

Three Utah brothers seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 election and return Donald Trump to the White House will not have their longshot lawsuit heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The litigation, Brunson v. Adams et. al., claimed nearly 400 members of Congress violated their oaths of office by not investigating claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election and voting to certify Joe Biden’s win.

Raland Brunson, the lead plaintiff in the suit, along with brothers Loy and Deron, asked for those members of Congress, along with President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, to be removed from office and barred from ever running again. Similarly, former Vice President Mike Pence would also be banned from holding another elective office.

In an order published Monday, the Supreme Court said it would not hear the Utahn’s case.

Supreme Court rejects Utah brothersâ lawsuit seeking to return Donald Trump to the White House

The Supreme Court decided not to hear a lawsuit by a trio of Utah brothers that claim members of Congress who voted to certify President Joe Biden's election violated their oath of office by not investigating claims of fraud in 2020. The Utahns wanted those members of Congress, along with Biden...

www.sltrib.com

They were so close too.

 

[BULLDOG]

Uh huh. I wouldn't trust the edited video the J6 Commission fed to you all that much.

That's because your brain has been poisoned. Do you really think our government, and all it's agencies want to destroy the country? Do you understand how bizarrely stupid that is?

 

[BlindBoo]

Not one single court in the land, including the SC, has ever heard a case as to whether they violated their oath of office.

Because of the absurdity of the notion no doubt.

 

[BULLDOG]

My point is, we must find ways to accomplish that list to ensure automatic and perpetual power of the American people as the Constitution requires.

Your suggestion that it can be accomplished via violence just doesn't fly in the face of history and experience.

I know for a fact that no coup was attempted. There was no insurrection. There was a riot that may or may not have been instigated by over zealous Patriots--there is reason to believe even some in our government may have promoted that riot--but I am 100% certain there was no intent to overthrow the government. There very likely was some intent to undermine the scheduled and legally authorized protest and especially President Trump.

Attempted overthrow of a legal election to install the election loser is a coup. Our presidents are elected, not installed through force and intimidation.

 

[BULLDOG]

who cares what baby killers think?

Get lost.. go find a lib forum

Do you need a hug?

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Mostly hearsay and propaganda in my opinion with some of it fed to the 'witnesses' to say. For instance the Secret Service immediately publicly discredited Cassidy Hutchinson's completely manufactured story about Trump's behavior. All of it selectively edited, coached, and rehearsed and with no witnesses allowed that would offer different testimony and no cross examination of any witnesses, no due process of any kind was used. Unless the WHOLE truth, ALL the truth, and nothing BUT the truth is utilized, no testimony is worth much to convict or absolve anybody. The J6 Commission certainly did not even attempt to provide that.

How many times did the J6 committee, anti-Trumpers on Twitter, Facebook, message boards etc. show those idiots in war paint and such marching toward the camera. But did you see the Capitol policeman escorting those same guys into the congressional chamber and how peaceful and orderly that was until I posted it? The J6 commission had no intent of anybody in the public seeing that. Or the hours and hours of video showing most of the people just wandering around looking at stuff and doing absolutely nothing illegal after being admitted by the Capitol police and with the Capitol police present, chatting with them, making no effort to encourage them to vacate the premises.

Until Patriots admit the riot was wrong, destructive, counter productive, an evil thing and the left admits that what we had on Jan 6 was definitely a legal mostly peaceful protest upstaged by a relative few instigating a stupid riot, the truth will be elusive for most.

But there was no coup. No insurrection. No intent or effort to overthrow the government. Hopefully the new House majority will show the rest of the story. Are you okay with that?

Your opinion of yourself may be high, but your opinions are average bs. Sworn tstimony is not hearsay and propaganda. We're talking testimony from his staff, his family and others close to him .. We are not talking people with an agenda to get poor little Donnie from Queens

Actually, the Secret Service did not discredit Cassidy Hutchinson. Read exactly what was said under oath and then think about of brought before a grand jury and given immunity what people will say

When Cheney joined the committee she was a Trump ally pre-Jan 6

Your spin is sad and amusing. People are still being interviewed and some being charged and prosecuted later. They are not patriots any more than the Whiskey Rebels and Shay's Rebels were

 

[Dante Reawakened]

SOP. Imagine if all they had to do was open an investigation and just by their will alone could abrogate the citizens votes of any state by a claim of corruption.

The closest I've ever seen Congress acting non partisan was on 9-12-2001.

okay

whatever