Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking

The most recent cause of the progressive social justice crowd is the destigmatization of pedophilia. ...
WTF? Isn't Milo an "alt-right" Breibart conservative bigoted asshole?
Pedophilia is sexual perversion, indeed.
Your OP head is intellectual perversion.
Looks like you have something in common!

looks like your a leftist little CYKA
 
Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking
The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory rape or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory rape is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory rape law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from .............
---------------------------------------------------------

Acclimating the public to this has been in the works for a long time ... The system being used would be to complexed and the method that will be used in in plain view. But the people who can't understand how social engineering, so many methods are working on your brains and you have no idea how it's done but it's being done to you on a daily basis.

This entire OP is based on a myth that Ginsburg actually stated an OPINION on the age of consent being lowered to 12 yrs. She was merely quoting language from a Senate Bill of 3 intertwined definitions of rape that included one case where the age of consent was considered to be 12 yrs old. The other definitions did not. And she only cited it because it IMPROVED on the gender specific language that existed at the time for "rape".

It's a false furor created by folks who never read and probably could never understand the arguments being made by a skilled jurist... You need to read better sources and check stuff out before you whip this crap out.

Miranda distorted Ginsburg's record to falsely attack her "human rights standard"

...and why this thread should be in conspiracy theories instead of current events. This shit is someone that doesn't understand legal speak that is trying to deflect attention off of their boy Milo.


Well i'm sure since you one of the MOD ASS KISSERS it will end up there............. THE FACT IS A FACT AN ASSES USUALLY CAN'T STAND TO SEE TRUTH as half the assholes who deny it are the ones who support the bs trying to be passed.

You post crap where people can't understand what a fucking judge says in legal terms... and then post what those morons say as truth. It's not. You post this shit ALL the time. :rolleyes:
 
The most recent cause of the progressive social justice crowd is the destigmatization of pedophilia. ...
WTF? Isn't Milo an "alt-right" Breibart conservative bigoted asshole?
Pedophilia is sexual perversion, indeed.
Your OP head is intellectual perversion.
Looks like you have something in common!

He's one of those on this forum totally engulfed in trying to pass conspiracy shit off as truth.
 
Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking
The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory rape or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory rape is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory rape law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from .............
---------------------------------------------------------

Acclimating the public to this has been in the works for a long time ... The system being used would be to complexed and the method that will be used in in plain view. But the people who can't understand how social engineering, so many methods are working on your brains and you have no idea how it's done but it's being done to you on a daily basis.

This entire OP is based on a myth that Ginsburg actually stated an OPINION on the age of consent being lowered to 12 yrs. She was merely quoting language from a Senate Bill of 3 intertwined definitions of rape that included one case where the age of consent was considered to be 12 yrs old. The other definitions did not. And she only cited it because it IMPROVED on the gender specific language that existed at the time for "rape".

It's a false furor created by folks who never read and probably could never understand the arguments being made by a skilled jurist... You need to read better sources and check stuff out before you whip this crap out.

Miranda distorted Ginsburg's record to falsely attack her "human rights standard"


Did you watch the above video?

Why would I watch a video? Does it prove that Ginsburg ADVOCATED an age of consent of 12 years old?

And PLEASE don't expand the convo beyond the scope of the OP.. There were specific allegations in the OP that need to be discussed here. Not a free for all on pedophilia -- Milo, or what Slate occasionally stupidly advocate. One topic at a time.
 
The most recent cause of the progressive social justice crowd is the destigmatization of pedophilia. ...
WTF? Isn't Milo an "alt-right" Breibart conservative bigoted asshole?
Pedophilia is sexual perversion, indeed.
Your OP head is intellectual perversion.
Looks like you have something in common!

He's one of those on this forum totally engulfed in trying to pass conspiracy shit off as truth.

Dont make it personal. Discuss the OP topic..
 
The most recent cause of the progressive social justice crowd is the destigmatization of pedophilia. ...
WTF? Isn't Milo an "alt-right" Breibart conservative bigoted asshole?
Pedophilia is sexual perversion, indeed.
Your OP head is intellectual perversion.
Looks like you have something in common!
looks like your a leftist little CYKA
I'm on your right side, Жopa.
 
Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking
The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory rape or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory rape is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory rape law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from .............
---------------------------------------------------------

Acclimating the public to this has been in the works for a long time ... The system being used would be to complexed and the method that will be used in in plain view. But the people who can't understand how social engineering, so many methods are working on your brains and you have no idea how it's done but it's being done to you on a daily basis.

This entire OP is based on a myth that Ginsburg actually stated an OPINION on the age of consent being lowered to 12 yrs. She was merely quoting language from a Senate Bill of 3 intertwined definitions of rape that included one case where the age of consent was considered to be 12 yrs old. The other definitions did not. And she only cited it because it IMPROVED on the gender specific language that existed at the time for "rape".

It's a false furor created by folks who never read and probably could never understand the arguments being made by a skilled jurist... You need to read better sources and check stuff out before you whip this crap out.

Miranda distorted Ginsburg's record to falsely attack her "human rights standard"


Did you watch the above video?

Why would I watch a video? Does it prove that Ginsburg ADVOCATED an age of consent of 12 years old?

And PLEASE don't expand the convo beyond the scope of the OP.. There were specific allegations in the OP that need to be discussed here. Not a free for all on pedophilia -- Milo, or what Slate occasionally stupidly advocate. One topic at a time.


Because the GUY FLAT OUT SAYS he's fkn pervert so if the bs is what you said is so true there wouldn't be a guy confessing that he gets off looking at fkn five year olds.

Since you leftist bricks for brains DONT BOTHER TO READ/WATCH etc anything that doesn't fit what you want to see or hear you never learn a gawd damn thing.

You can't get it through your heads how these articles acclimate the public into accepting sick bs like this..

But NVM , i'm dealing with a brick wall a few brick walls on here...
 
Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking
The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory rape or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory rape is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory rape law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from .............
---------------------------------------------------------

Acclimating the public to this has been in the works for a long time ... The system being used would be to complexed and the method that will be used in in plain view. But the people who can't understand how social engineering, so many methods are working on your brains and you have no idea how it's done but it's being done to you on a daily basis.

This entire OP is based on a myth that Ginsburg actually stated an OPINION on the age of consent being lowered to 12 yrs. She was merely quoting language from a Senate Bill of 3 intertwined definitions of rape that included one case where the age of consent was considered to be 12 yrs old. The other definitions did not. And she only cited it because it IMPROVED on the gender specific language that existed at the time for "rape".

It's a false furor created by folks who never read and probably could never understand the arguments being made by a skilled jurist... You need to read better sources and check stuff out before you whip this crap out.

Miranda distorted Ginsburg's record to falsely attack her "human rights standard"


Did you watch the above video?

Why would I watch a video? Does it prove that Ginsburg ADVOCATED an age of consent of 12 years old?

And PLEASE don't expand the convo beyond the scope of the OP.. There were specific allegations in the OP that need to be discussed here. Not a free for all on pedophilia -- Milo, or what Slate occasionally stupidly advocate. One topic at a time.


WTH proves anything to those who do nothing but DENY it no matter wth you put in front of them.
Your all a like.
 
Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking
The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory rape or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory rape is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory rape law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from .............
---------------------------------------------------------

Acclimating the public to this has been in the works for a long time ... The system being used would be to complexed and the method that will be used in in plain view. But the people who can't understand how social engineering, so many methods are working on your brains and you have no idea how it's done but it's being done to you on a daily basis.

This entire OP is based on a myth that Ginsburg actually stated an OPINION on the age of consent being lowered to 12 yrs. She was merely quoting language from a Senate Bill of 3 intertwined definitions of rape that included one case where the age of consent was considered to be 12 yrs old. The other definitions did not. And she only cited it because it IMPROVED on the gender specific language that existed at the time for "rape".

It's a false furor created by folks who never read and probably could never understand the arguments being made by a skilled jurist... You need to read better sources and check stuff out before you whip this crap out.

Miranda distorted Ginsburg's record to falsely attack her "human rights standard"


Did you watch the above video?

Why would I watch a video? Does it prove that Ginsburg ADVOCATED an age of consent of 12 years old?

And PLEASE don't expand the convo beyond the scope of the OP.. There were specific allegations in the OP that need to be discussed here. Not a free for all on pedophilia -- Milo, or what Slate occasionally stupidly advocate. One topic at a time.


Because the GUY FLAT OUT SAYS he's fkn pervert so if the bs is what you said is so true there wouldn't be a guy confessing that he gets off looking at fkn five year olds.

Since you leftist bricks for brains DONT BOTHER TO READ/WATCH etc anything that doesn't fit what you want to see or hear you never learn a gawd damn thing.

You can't get it through your heads how these articles acclimate the public into accepting sick bs like this..

But NVM , i'm dealing with a brick wall a few brick walls on here...

Please explain what a pervert in a video admitting his problem has to do with interpreting what Ginsburg said.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: PK1
The most recent cause of the progressive social justice crowd is the destigmatization of pedophilia. ...
WTF? Isn't Milo an "alt-right" Breibart conservative bigoted asshole?
Pedophilia is sexual perversion, indeed.
Your OP head is intellectual perversion.
Looks like you have something in common!

He's one of those on this forum totally engulfed in trying to pass conspiracy shit off as truth.

Dont make it personal. Discuss the OP topic..


More recently a self-described organization of “minor-attracted people,” B4U-ACT, held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.

B4U-ACT and other pedophile advocacy organizations cite an APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”

In 2013 in California Congresswoman Rep. Jackie Speier, a Democrat, proposed federalizing a state law prohibiting counseling to change a person’s sexual orientation. The bill, according to critics, defines pedophilia as a sexual orientation and would afford the same rights granted to homosexuals.

“This language is so broad and vague, it arguably could include all forms of sexual orientation, including pedophilia,” said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute. “It’s not just the orientation that is protected — the conduct associated with the orientation is protected as well.”

Democrats defeated an amendment by Republicans that stated “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation.” A Florida Democrat, Rep. Alcee Hastings, said all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law.
 
(RETHINK SOCIETY) California Congresswoman, Rep. Jackie Speier CA (D), wants to federalize a state law to prohibit counseling to change a person’s sexual orientation. That doesn’t sound that extreme, but pedophilia is a sexual orientation according to this bill as well.

Under the bill’s language, a mental health counselor could be sanctioned if there was an attempt to get a pedophile or gay individual to change his behavior or speak negatively about their behavior as it relates to sexuality.

The bill calls on states to prohibit efforts to change a minor’s sexual orientation, even if the minor requests it, saying that doing so is “dangerous and harmful.”

The text of the legislation doesn’t specifically ban “gay” conversion therapy. Instead, it prohibits attempts to change a person’s sexual orientation.

“Sexual orientation change efforts’ means any practices by mental health providers that seek to change an individual’s sexual orientation,” the bill says.

Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying that, “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation.” However, the Democrats defeated the amendment. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law, and accordingly decided that pedophilia is a sexual orientation that should be equally as embraced as homosexuality.

“This language is so broad and vague, it arguably could include all forms of sexual orientation, including pedophilia,” said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute. “It’s not just the orientation that is protected—the conduct associated with the orientation is protected as well.”


Pedophilia Is A Sexual Orientation Under CA Bill
 
The most recent cause of the progressive social justice crowd is the destigmatization of pedophilia. ...
WTF? Isn't Milo an "alt-right" Breibart conservative bigoted asshole?
Pedophilia is sexual perversion, indeed.
Your OP head is intellectual perversion.
Looks like you have something in common!

He's one of those on this forum totally engulfed in trying to pass conspiracy shit off as truth.

Dont make it personal. Discuss the OP topic..


More recently a self-described organization of “minor-attracted people,” B4U-ACT, held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.

B4U-ACT and other pedophile advocacy organizations cite an APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”

In 2013 in California Congresswoman Rep. Jackie Speier, a Democrat, proposed federalizing a state law prohibiting counseling to change a person’s sexual orientation. The bill, according to critics, defines pedophilia as a sexual orientation and would afford the same rights granted to homosexuals.

“This language is so broad and vague, it arguably could include all forms of sexual orientation, including pedophilia,” said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute. “It’s not just the orientation that is protected — the conduct associated with the orientation is protected as well.”

Democrats defeated an amendment by Republicans that stated “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation.” A Florida Democrat, Rep. Alcee Hastings, said all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law.

Again, what does this have to do with what Ginsburg said? Also do you understand that laws are written all the time where they are not specific and thus allow others to point out loopholes in them so they can shoot them down. People always assume the worst and that the broad language was done deliberately, but no, most times it isn't, it's just a lack of foresight and understanding what extremes people will try to take it to.
 
Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex trafficking
The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married. It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory rape or sexual assault . . . .

Statutory rape is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent. Every state has a statutory rape law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from .............
---------------------------------------------------------

Acclimating the public to this has been in the works for a long time ... The system being used would be to complexed and the method that will be used in in plain view. But the people who can't understand how social engineering, so many methods are working on your brains and you have no idea how it's done but it's being done to you on a daily basis.

This entire OP is based on a myth that Ginsburg actually stated an OPINION on the age of consent being lowered to 12 yrs. She was merely quoting language from a Senate Bill of 3 intertwined definitions of rape that included one case where the age of consent was considered to be 12 yrs old. The other definitions did not. And she only cited it because it IMPROVED on the gender specific language that existed at the time for "rape".

It's a false furor created by folks who never read and probably could never understand the arguments being made by a skilled jurist... You need to read better sources and check stuff out before you whip this crap out.

Miranda distorted Ginsburg's record to falsely attack her "human rights standard"


Did you watch the above video?

Why would I watch a video? Does it prove that Ginsburg ADVOCATED an age of consent of 12 years old?

And PLEASE don't expand the convo beyond the scope of the OP.. There were specific allegations in the OP that need to be discussed here. Not a free for all on pedophilia -- Milo, or what Slate occasionally stupidly advocate. One topic at a time.


Because the GUY FLAT OUT SAYS he's fkn pervert so if the bs is what you said is so true there wouldn't be a guy confessing that he gets off looking at fkn five year olds.

Since you leftist bricks for brains DONT BOTHER TO READ/WATCH etc anything that doesn't fit what you want to see or hear you never learn a gawd damn thing.

You can't get it through your heads how these articles acclimate the public into accepting sick bs like this..

But NVM , i'm dealing with a brick wall a few brick walls on here...

I'm just very organized in how I accept my media. When I can't get past the FIRST lie or assertion, I want to know why that media outlet lied to me. That's just the way I would hope MOST people would do "buy ins" on assertions. I don't mind conspiracies -- I have a few of my own. But I'm WORKING on them. Not ready for prime time.

And this board just isn't structured to have rolling artillery battles over 5 or 8 skirmishes at once..

Do you understand how Ms Ginsburg was mis-interpreted? Can you see how that MIGHT have been taken out of context? Now understand -- I don't fully trust Media Matters either. Because MMatters has been caught lying to me several times. But in the link I provided -- they provided a credible explanation for a Justice Ginsburg thesis that was much more complicated than simply advocating for LEGALIZING pedophilia --- as it says in your OP. Doesn't even mean I AGREE with the REAL story of what she was whining about. I'm not a dupe. I question stuff because my wheelhouse is science/engineering and nerds just are built that way...
 
It also means that, if pedophilia is a sexual orientation, that discrimination laws also apply to pedophiles. That means you cannot block a pedophile from being a preschool teacher or any other high-risk occupation.

Recently, a United States District Court Judge, William Shubb, sided with Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) by granting their plaintiffs a preliminary injunction against the legislation, which is known as California SB 1172.

“Because the court finds that SB 1172 is subject to strict scrutiny and is unlikely to satisfy this standard, the court finds that plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims based on violations of their rights to freedom of speech under the First Amendment,” wrote Judge Shubb.

“This victory sends a clear signal to all those who feel they can stifle religious freedom, free speech, and the rights of parents without being contested,” said PJI President, Brad Dacus. “We at PJI are ready to fight this battle all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary.

SB1172 ----------------- There's your first CLUE to learn......................
 
The most recent cause of the progressive social justice crowd is the destigmatization of pedophilia. ...
WTF? Isn't Milo an "alt-right" Breibart conservative bigoted asshole?
Pedophilia is sexual perversion, indeed.
Your OP head is intellectual perversion.
Looks like you have something in common!

He's one of those on this forum totally engulfed in trying to pass conspiracy shit off as truth.

Dont make it personal. Discuss the OP topic..


More recently a self-described organization of “minor-attracted people,” B4U-ACT, held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.

B4U-ACT and other pedophile advocacy organizations cite an APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”

In 2013 in California Congresswoman Rep. Jackie Speier, a Democrat, proposed federalizing a state law prohibiting counseling to change a person’s sexual orientation. The bill, according to critics, defines pedophilia as a sexual orientation and would afford the same rights granted to homosexuals.

“This language is so broad and vague, it arguably could include all forms of sexual orientation, including pedophilia,” said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute. “It’s not just the orientation that is protected — the conduct associated with the orientation is protected as well.”

Democrats defeated an amendment by Republicans that stated “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation.” A Florida Democrat, Rep. Alcee Hastings, said all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law.

Again, what does this have to do with what Ginsburg said? Also do you understand that laws are written all the time where they are not specific and thus allow others to point out loopholes in them so they can shoot them down. People always assume the worst and that the broad language was done deliberately, but no, most times it isn't, it's just a lack of foresight and understanding what extremes people will try to take it to.



AGAIN SHE SAYS AN ARGUMENT TO LEGALIZE PERVERTS............... or are you to far up the Gov. azz to comprehend that' s what this about.>>>......JESUS CHRIST......
 
It also means that, if pedophilia is a sexual orientation, that discrimination laws also apply to pedophiles. That means you cannot block a pedophile from being a preschool teacher or any other high-risk occupation.

Recently, a United States District Court Judge, William Shubb, sided with Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) by granting their plaintiffs a preliminary injunction against the legislation, which is known as California SB 1172.

“Because the court finds that SB 1172 is subject to strict scrutiny and is unlikely to satisfy this standard, the court finds that plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims based on violations of their rights to freedom of speech under the First Amendment,” wrote Judge Shubb.

“This victory sends a clear signal to all those who feel they can stifle religious freedom, free speech, and the rights of parents without being contested,” said PJI President, Brad Dacus. “We at PJI are ready to fight this battle all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary.

SB1172 ----------------- There's your first CLUE to learn......................

NO. No it does not mean that. There are background checks... and pedophilia is ILLEGAL.
 
WTF? Isn't Milo an "alt-right" Breibart conservative bigoted asshole?
Pedophilia is sexual perversion, indeed.
Your OP head is intellectual perversion.
Looks like you have something in common!

He's one of those on this forum totally engulfed in trying to pass conspiracy shit off as truth.

Dont make it personal. Discuss the OP topic..


More recently a self-described organization of “minor-attracted people,” B4U-ACT, held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.

B4U-ACT and other pedophile advocacy organizations cite an APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”

In 2013 in California Congresswoman Rep. Jackie Speier, a Democrat, proposed federalizing a state law prohibiting counseling to change a person’s sexual orientation. The bill, according to critics, defines pedophilia as a sexual orientation and would afford the same rights granted to homosexuals.

“This language is so broad and vague, it arguably could include all forms of sexual orientation, including pedophilia,” said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute. “It’s not just the orientation that is protected — the conduct associated with the orientation is protected as well.”

Democrats defeated an amendment by Republicans that stated “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation.” A Florida Democrat, Rep. Alcee Hastings, said all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law.

Again, what does this have to do with what Ginsburg said? Also do you understand that laws are written all the time where they are not specific and thus allow others to point out loopholes in them so they can shoot them down. People always assume the worst and that the broad language was done deliberately, but no, most times it isn't, it's just a lack of foresight and understanding what extremes people will try to take it to.



AGAIN SHE SAYS AN ARGUMENT TO LEGALIZE PERVERTS............... or are you to far up the Gov. azz to comprehend that' s what this about.>>>......JESUS CHRIST......

No, that's not what the bill was about. It was about making using counseling to change someone's sexual orientation illegal... like Pence's advocacy for Conversion therapy in Indiana. You are acting like Chicken Little.

And since being called out about Ginsburg being misrepresented you haven't gone back to that topic, and have just thrown out Red Herring after Red Herring.
 
WTF? Isn't Milo an "alt-right" Breibart conservative bigoted asshole?
Pedophilia is sexual perversion, indeed.
Your OP head is intellectual perversion.
Looks like you have something in common!

He's one of those on this forum totally engulfed in trying to pass conspiracy shit off as truth.

Dont make it personal. Discuss the OP topic..


More recently a self-described organization of “minor-attracted people,” B4U-ACT, held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.

B4U-ACT and other pedophile advocacy organizations cite an APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”

In 2013 in California Congresswoman Rep. Jackie Speier, a Democrat, proposed federalizing a state law prohibiting counseling to change a person’s sexual orientation. The bill, according to critics, defines pedophilia as a sexual orientation and would afford the same rights granted to homosexuals.

“This language is so broad and vague, it arguably could include all forms of sexual orientation, including pedophilia,” said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute. “It’s not just the orientation that is protected — the conduct associated with the orientation is protected as well.”

Democrats defeated an amendment by Republicans that stated “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation.” A Florida Democrat, Rep. Alcee Hastings, said all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law.

Again, what does this have to do with what Ginsburg said? Also do you understand that laws are written all the time where they are not specific and thus allow others to point out loopholes in them so they can shoot them down. People always assume the worst and that the broad language was done deliberately, but no, most times it isn't, it's just a lack of foresight and understanding what extremes people will try to take it to.



AGAIN SHE SAYS AN ARGUMENT TO LEGALIZE PERVERTS............... or are you to far up the Gov. azz to comprehend that' s what this about.>>>......JESUS CHRIST......

Who is "she"? You talking about Ginsburg or you're NEXT topic and Jackie Speir -- which is the last quote about Congressional fights over protections of lifestyle choices? Seems like you're opening the discussion much BROADER than what you asserted in the OP..
 
You need to read better sources and check stuff out before you whip this crap out.
You know you're talking to MindWars right? He's nothing more than an InfoWars regurgitation machine, headlines coming from any of the conspiracy sites he follows is automatically considered valid and fact checked, even if he lacks the education and critical thinking skills to grasp any of what they are talking about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top