You are entitled to your opinion, BenNatuf, but the case will be decided on the interstate commerce clause, nothing else.
In other words, Fakey has ZERO support for his now repeated mere expression of opinion.
It would have been more honest to just admit it.
But, alas, Fakey is simply not comfortable with being honest.
There is nothing to discuss of merit of your whinging, guys. The merits of Congressional right to control interstate commerce. That's what it will be.
"Whinging."
Methinks the dimwit meant "whining." v Of course, there hasn't been any whining, either.
But he's half right.
There is nothing to discuss with Fakey since he adamantly sticks to his mere opinion when it is noted that he has nothing with which to support his views.
If he says it a couple of times, or adds another ad hominem, then by golly, it MUST be a powerful opinion.
Meanwhile, the SCOTUS grants cert as it sees fit and determines these issues on the bases they consider appropriate. Oddly, they never seem to consult with Fakey.