- Banned
- #1
You stupid hateful anti Liberty Moon Bats are going to get screwed big time over this case.
The Court is going to rule on strict scrutiny (the real issue), which has always been lacking with the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. That will mean that a lot of the filthy ass gun laws that the commie states have adopted will be thrown out.
This case will be bigger than Heller. With Kennedy gone there won't have to be a watering down compromise on the RKABA like we had with the Heller case. The Conservatives on the Court wouldn't have taken the case if they were not ready to rule on strict scrutiny.
Supreme Court may expand Second Amendment rights despite repeal of disputed gun restrictions
Supreme Court may expand Second Amendment rights despite repeal of disputed gun restrictions
The court on Monday will hear a challenge to an obscure New York City rule that set such rigid restrictions on transporting legally owned guns that it was repealed in July.
But it turns out that wasn't what they really wanted. Backed by the National Rifle Association and the Trump administration, the challengers to New York's abandoned restrictions are hoping the high court refuses to declare the case moot. That would give them a chance to win the biggest Second Amendment victory since landmark rulings a decade ago affirmed the right to keep guns at home for self-defense.
Faced with a defunct ban on transporting guns outside city limits, the increasingly conservative court majority could render a decision making clear what some justices believe: that the Second Amendment extends beyond the home, and that lower courts should view state and local limits on carrying guns in public with skepticism.
The Court is going to rule on strict scrutiny (the real issue), which has always been lacking with the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. That will mean that a lot of the filthy ass gun laws that the commie states have adopted will be thrown out.
This case will be bigger than Heller. With Kennedy gone there won't have to be a watering down compromise on the RKABA like we had with the Heller case. The Conservatives on the Court wouldn't have taken the case if they were not ready to rule on strict scrutiny.
Supreme Court may expand Second Amendment rights despite repeal of disputed gun restrictions
Supreme Court may expand Second Amendment rights despite repeal of disputed gun restrictions
The court on Monday will hear a challenge to an obscure New York City rule that set such rigid restrictions on transporting legally owned guns that it was repealed in July.
But it turns out that wasn't what they really wanted. Backed by the National Rifle Association and the Trump administration, the challengers to New York's abandoned restrictions are hoping the high court refuses to declare the case moot. That would give them a chance to win the biggest Second Amendment victory since landmark rulings a decade ago affirmed the right to keep guns at home for self-defense.
Faced with a defunct ban on transporting guns outside city limits, the increasingly conservative court majority could render a decision making clear what some justices believe: that the Second Amendment extends beyond the home, and that lower courts should view state and local limits on carrying guns in public with skepticism.