The bad guys have to dig deeper:
See link for info and photos:
See link for info and photos:
U.S. drops 'mother of all bombs' on ISIS in Afghanistan | Daily Mail Online
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not a bunker buster. It has no penetrating capabilities.
It also cost 314 million dollars. What happened to America first? You have starving seniors and homeless veterans, but your government is spending 314 million to drop a bomb on millitiamen in Central Asia.
To Onyx: You are exactly the kind of person who see Julian Assange and Edward Snowden as heros. CIA Director Pompeo was talking about useful fools like you:You have starving seniors and homeless veterans, but your government is spending 314 million to drop a bomb on millitiamen in Central Asia.
To Cross: The parasites want every penny spent on their welfare state.It cost 16 million per unit.
The bad guys have to dig deeper:
See link for info and photos:
U.S. drops 'mother of all bombs' on ISIS in Afghanistan | Daily Mail Online
Well there you go! If we didn't drop this bomb, we'd have no starving seniors and no homeless veterans. Problem solved.You have starving seniors and homeless veterans
Wrong, but you keep believing that, umkay? Be sure to tell all of your friends that bit of misinformation.It's not a bunker buster. It has no penetrating capabilities.
It also cost 314 million dollars. What happened to America first? You have starving seniors and homeless veterans, but your government is spending 314 million to drop a bomb on millitiamen in Central Asia.
To danielpalos: Tell the little fat guy with the bad haircut he can stop worrying:Means nothing.
It's not a bunker buster. It has no penetrating capabilities.
It also cost 314 million dollars. What happened to America first? You have starving seniors and homeless veterans, but your government is spending 314 million to drop a bomb on millitiamen in Central Asia.
LOL. He's more likely to be capped in the back of his head by his own people or the Chinese than us.To danielpalos: Tell the little fat guy with the bad haircut he can stop worrying:Means nothing.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ca...teve_breen_steve_breen_for_apr_14_2017_5_.jpg
No, they weren't. We don't have a national defense clause, nor even a common offense or general warfare clause. We do have a common defense clause and general welfare clause.To Onyx: You are exactly the kind of person who see Julian Assange and Edward Snowden as heros. CIA Director Pompeo was talking about useful fools like you:You have starving seniors and homeless veterans, but your government is spending 314 million to drop a bomb on millitiamen in Central Asia.
VIDEO ▼
CIA director: WikiLeaks acts as a hostile intel service
To Cross: The parasites want every penny spent on their welfare state.It cost 16 million per unit.
Should we "ask him" to "call us on our Commerce Clause"?To danielpalos: Tell the little fat guy with the bad haircut he can stop worrying:Means nothing.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ca...teve_breen_steve_breen_for_apr_14_2017_5_.jpg
To danielpalos: I do not understand your response. Please clarify.No, they weren't. We don't have a national defense clause, nor even a common offense or general warfare clause. We do have a common defense clause and general welfare clause.
To danielpalos: Please explain why you cited the Commerce Clause.Should we "ask him" to "call us on our Commerce Clause"?
It's not a bunker buster. It has no penetrating capabilities.
It also cost 314 million dollars. What happened to America first? You have starving seniors and homeless veterans, but your government is spending 314 million to drop a bomb on millitiamen in Central Asia.
It cost 16 million per unit....better they use it on the tribesmen or it will end up at a police station in Philly....
We have a Constitution.To danielpalos: I do not understand your response. Please clarify.No, they weren't. We don't have a national defense clause, nor even a common offense or general warfare clause. We do have a common defense clause and general welfare clause.
To danielpalos: Please explain why you cited the Commerce Clause.Should we "ask him" to "call us on our Commerce Clause"?
To danielpalos: What we have is the parasite class double-speaking the Constitution to justify surrender and the welfare state. This is where I get off.We don't have a national defense clause, nor even a common offense or general warfare clause. We do have a common defense clause and general welfare clause.
To danielpalos: I do not understand your response. Please clarify.No, they weren't. We don't have a national defense clause, nor even a common offense or general warfare clause. We do have a common defense clause and general welfare clause.
To danielpalos: Please explain why you cited the Commerce Clause.Should we "ask him" to "call us on our Commerce Clause"?
To danielpalos: What we have is the parasite class double-speaking the Constitution to justify surrender and the welfare state. This is where I get off.We don't have a national defense clause, nor even a common offense or general warfare clause. We do have a common defense clause and general welfare clause.
dear, the right wing is merely, clueless and Causeless.To danielpalos: I do not understand your response. Please clarify.No, they weren't. We don't have a national defense clause, nor even a common offense or general warfare clause. We do have a common defense clause and general welfare clause.
To danielpalos: Please explain why you cited the Commerce Clause.Should we "ask him" to "call us on our Commerce Clause"?
He has no idea what it is, but it sounds 'cool,' so he drops it into almost every post.